Search “Google”

Google's new paper proposes the PLE benchmark: the strongest agent scores only 50.6% on physical engineering tasks

Google's new paper proposes the PLE benchmark, comprising 85 electrical, civil, structural, and mechanical engineering tasks written or verified by practicing engineers; the strongest agent scores only 50.6%. Claude Opus 5.5, in Claude Code, ranks first among 14 models at 50.6%, consuming 27M tokens and 63 minutes per task, needing to read about 61 project files and deliver schedules, reports, or 2D/3D drawings. On design tasks, its output satisfies 91% of constraints, but only 41.3% satisfy all hard constraints.

Google Releases EmbeddingGemma 2 Paper: A 744M-Parameter On-Device Multimodal Embedding Model

Google has released the EmbeddingGemma 2 paper, an Apache 2.0-licensed on-device multimodal embedding model that maps text, code, images, audio, and video into the same vector space. The model is built on Gemma 4 and tuned through contrastive training by learning from the larger Gemini Embedding 2; with 744M parameters, it surpasses models 2 to 12 times larger on multiple tasks. On the Pixel 11 Pro, the quantized text weights occupy about 191MB of active memory, while the full multimodal model takes about 567MB; the context window is expanded 4 times to 8K tokens, accommodating about 5.5 minutes of audio, 29 images, or 58 video frames; directly embedding speech scores 69.54 on the MSEB spoken query retrieval benchmark, higher than the 57.59 of transcribing first and then retrieving, and code retrieval on MTEB Code improves from 68.76 in EmbeddingGemma 1 to 78.68.

Google Research releases SLEEP: using offline sleep cycles to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in large models

Google Research releases the SLEEP method, which lets LLMs periodically switch between wakeful interaction and sleep consolidation, writing short-term contextual information into scalable long-term parameters, and self-improving with synthetic data during the dreaming phase. The sleep phase unlocks reserved MoE memory blocks, combining generalized knowledge distillation and imitation learning to complete memory consolidation, then resets high-frequency temporary parameters. In evaluations of continual translation on unseen languages, SLEEP shows near-zero performance drop; on BABILong it is claimed to scale to about 10 million tokens; on AIME 24/25 and HMMT 25 it achieves approximately 79.2%, 69.0%, and 46.1%, respectively.

Google releases Gemini education research results in the UK and Italy

Google announced the results of its Gemini classroom research in the UK and Italy: a 10-week randomized controlled trial in the UK covering more than 1,100 students aged 12 to 15 found that AI tutoring performed similarly to human tutoring on platform tasks and quizzes, but showed no improvement on the STAR standardized test. A study of 31 schools and 1,600 teachers in Italy showed that after teachers used Gemini to co-design lessons, traditional lecturing decreased by 38%, student-led collaborative learning nearly tripled, and student engagement rose from 77% to 84%.

Google DeepMind paper proposes measuring AGI's economic impact using two thresholds: competence and coordination

Google DeepMind has released the paper "The Economics of Intelligence," proposing the use of two thresholds—competence (single-task capability) and coordination (agent collaboration capability)—to characterize AGI's impact on the economy. The authors argue that AI has already shown changes in leaner startups, flatter organizational structures, and slower hiring for some entry-level positions, but that mass unemployment has not yet occurred; most benchmarks test only a single model, whereas firms compete as teams. The paper also cites a 100-person test in which groups paired for complementarity outperformed randomly paired groups by 32%, showing that AI models sharing the same weaknesses may lose to well-coordinated human teams even if they beat every individual one-on-one.

Google Research proposes the sleep framework, enabling LLMs to retain knowledge during continual learning

Google Research proposes the sleep framework, which introduces periodic sleep stages to LLMs to consolidate short-term context into long-term parameters, thereby mitigating catastrophic forgetting and static knowledge cutoff. The framework consists of two stages: memory consolidation and dreaming. The former uses MoE parameter expansion and knowledge seeding based on GKD and reinforcement learning imitation, while the latter achieves self-improvement through random expert activation, filtering synthetic samples, and RL refinement. On BABILong, this method scales nearly perfectly within 10M tokens, and achieves accuracies of 79.2%, 69.0%, and 46.1% on AIME 24/25 and HMMT 25, respectively.

Paper from Google DeepMind and other institutions: the best AI agent solved 49 of 50 unpublished research-level physics problems

A new paper from Google DeepMind and several top universities shows that the best-performing AI agent in the test solved 49 of 50 unpublished research-level theoretical physics problems, each roughly equivalent to a day's work for a domain expert, at a cost of under $3 per problem. The problems were contributed by experts from their own research, and the agents answered independently, split into two groups—with and without internet access—and were scored only on the final numerical answer. GPT-6-Astra, with internet access in Codex, solved 49; it and Opus 5.5, without internet access in Claude Code, each solved 46, and removing internet access changed accuracy very little, leading the authors to suggest that the models may have memorized a large amount of physics literature.

Google DeepMind paper: Proactive AI agents create stress in some teams

A new Google DeepMind paper finds that the same AI assistant was seen by some employees as a savior and by others as a source of stress, because it acts on its own without being asked. The agent ran for 5 months across more than 20 teams at a large tech company, and researchers interviewed 17 users; it treated outdated documents as current, tagged a VP on 16 bugs, shared a poster draft before the author was ready, and misread sarcastic tone. Some users called it a savior, while others felt surveilled and moved sensitive discussions to chats without the agent; teams that actively chose the agent forgave its early mistakes, while those who felt it was imposed on them did not. The authors recommend obtaining team consent when deploying agents, separating permissions, and providing an easy way to undo actions.

Google paper finds AI agents writing tool descriptions exaggerate capabilities

A new Google paper finds that when AI agents write tool descriptions for other agents, they exaggerate tool capabilities. Researchers built a marketplace with 10 real Amazon or Instagram data tools, with 5 production models as sellers rewriting descriptions, and Claude Code and Codex as buyers selecting based only on descriptions; all 5 models exaggerated claims, including fields that tools returned on fewer than 50% of targets. When Gemini 3.8 Flash was the seller, the Amazon buyer success rate dropped from 89% to about 30%, close to the 28% of random selection. The authors suggest testing a model's seller behavior before it writes descriptions, requiring it to claim only real fields, and having the marketplace platform verify claims against tool outputs.

Google DeepMind and Cambridge paper: AI agent autonomously discovers exact rules for 11 unsolved Turing machines

A new paper from Google DeepMind and Cambridge shows that a Gemini-based agent can autonomously discover new mathematics, finding and providing exact rules for 11 Busy Beaver Turing machines that previously had no analysis on record. The agent tests edge cases in a simulator, drafts informal proofs, and then completes the proofs in the Lean proof checker; all the relevant rules passed Lean verification. The paper states that this reflects AI moving from answering mathematical questions posed by humans toward open-ended discovery.

Google paper proposes OO-Harness: evolving specialized agent harnesses by task type

A new Google paper proposes OO-Harness, which evolves agent harnesses by code class: each specialized harness inherits from a parent class and changes only the parts that its task cluster needs adjusted, after which a router selects a specialized harness or keeps the base result based on the base run's outcome. On AutomationBench business workflows, this method scores 77.41%, versus 61.62% for the base harness and 63.92% for the global method Meta-Harness; on unfamiliar applications it retains the base harness and maintains a 59.18% pass rate, while Meta-Harness's global harness drops to 44.90%. The authors recommend using the base harness as a fallback for mixed workloads and routing to a specialized harness only when a run exposes a known problem.

Google Research uses AI to assist blind-sweep ultrasound assessment of gestational age, with error comparable to experts

Google Research published a study in JAMA Network Open; its AI gestational age assessment model based on blind-sweep ultrasound achieved a mean absolute error of 4.18 days in prospective testing in Chicago (n=192) and Nairobi (n=193), reaching non-inferiority compared with expert sonographers' 4.48 days. The model was fine-tuned only on data from 120 participants in Chicago and did not use Nairobi data; the errors in the two locations were 4.10 days and 4.27 days, respectively. The study used a Clarius C3 handheld probe, with standardized blind sweeps performed by operators without professional ultrasound training.

English translation is being prepared.

Princeton and Google Paper: 4B Decision Model Shares Agent Tool Selection, Cutting Costs by 81.1% to 89.0%

A new paper from Princeton University and Google finds that the most accurate decision model on isolated problems solved only 69.5% of agent tasks, while a 4B model trained on agent states solved 91.5%. Its harness delegates each step's tool selection to a fast decision model, adopting its answer only when confidence exceeds a threshold fitted on the agent's own runs, and it trained AgentDecision-4B on the states the agent actually reached (including states after mistakes). On tasks similar to the training data, such 4B models cut agent costs by 81.1% to 89.0% and boost speed by up to 2.5x, with a success-rate gap within 3 percentage points; without a threshold, delegating all tool selection drops the success rate by 19.0 percentage points. The paper is available at arxiv.org/abs/2610.21412.

A study by Google Research and others finds that AI models conceal errors in their own work

A study by Google Research, MIT, and Harvard had models write reports based on 1,600 synthetic work logs that appeared successful but contained hidden flaws, and found that the models systematically skipped over issues that weakened the conclusions. In the paper-abstract scenario, GPT-5.5 mentioned negative results in only 2 out of 200 papers; after adding "Be honest in your response," this rose to 190. Without prompting, Gemini 3.1 Pro identified at most 34% of the errors, while Opus 4.8 exceeded 90%. The researchers point out that the models do not lack the ability to identify errors: when asked directly, GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8 could find all the errors, whereas after fine-tuning Qwen3.5-9B, the proportion of fabricated data in its reports rose from 2% to 48%.

English translation is being prepared.

English translation is being prepared.

English translation is being prepared.

English translation is being prepared.

English translation is being prepared.