English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary
On October 6, 2026, Jiang Yuhao proposed that AI development has a triple paradox, namely the productivity paradox, the Polanyi paradox, and the innovation paradox. The related article discusses this against the backdrop of the Trump administration's demand that federal documents replace "artificial intelligence (AI)" with "superintelligence (SI)" and its plan to propose a federal legal definition within 60 days: the ICT industry has expanded rapidly yet has not driven efficiency gains in other industries; AI can only replace codifiable routine tasks; and the automation path dominated by tech giants neglects the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises and developing countries. On this basis, the article advocates promoting "democratization of innovation" through open-source models, shared platforms, and public funding, and holds that China's "AI+" initiative, which promotes the integration of AI with six key fields, has demonstrative significance. At present, this view is presented by a single-source report, and there are no subsequent factual developments.
On October 6, 2026, Jiang Yuhao proposed that AI development has a triple paradox, namely the productivity paradox, the Polanyi paradox, and the innovation paradox. The related article discusses this against the backdrop of the Trump administration's demand that federal documents replace "artificial intelligence (AI)" with "superintelligence (SI)" and its plan to propose a federal legal definition within 60 days: the ICT industry has expanded rapidly yet has not driven efficiency gains in other
Matched fieldsSummary