Musk Relents: A Sufficiently Good AI May Take Control of the Future

When machines are stronger than you at everything, what meaning is left in being alive? Biographer Isaacson pressed Musk face to face in the latest interview, and what he got was a minimalist parable about growing vegetables in the backyard. If future AI and robots are better than humans at everything, what meaning is left in human existence? Musk took less than a minute to give an extremely calm answer that nonetheless completely overturns industrial values. He said: We humans will probably all end up as people growing vegetables in the backyard. There was never any room for wishful thinking from the start— any specific skill humans can master, future machines can not only do, but do at lower cost, faster speed, and with more flawless quality. Just as today you have absolutely no need to clear land and grow potatoes in the backyard under the blazing sun—vegetables at the corner supermarket are always cheaper and fresher than what you grow yourself. But even today some people still like to tend a few tomato plants on the balcony, spend a whole afternoon washing vegetables and cooking, just to serve friends a plate of food they grew themselves. In pure industrial efficiency this is a complete negative asset, but it carries a warmth that machines can never calculate. For the past few centuries, modern society has alienated everyone into precision gears chasing efficiency. You trade your problem-solving ability for a salary, and your social status, dignity of existence, even your meaning of survival are all tightly kidnapped by the three words "usefulness." But once machines push efficiency to its physical limit, usefulness instantly depreciates to the cheapest cabbage price. At that point humanity will not head toward nihilism; humanity is undergoing a civilization-level forced retirement. Like those retirees who live incredibly full lives, they no longer need to work for any boss, no longer need to prove their output to anyone; they paint, grow flowers, fish, purely because they enjoy it. Isaacson immediately followed up: What about art? Does art still belong to humans? Musk's answer was even clearer and more direct: Of course you can create whatever you want. Paintings drawn and songs written by machines can crush everyone in technique. But the meaning of human creation has never been about competing with machines on technique; it is about confirming, in the clumsy process of creation, that you are still truly alive. When the shackles of making a living are completely torn apart by machines, art and labor truly break free from utility and return to being pure games of the mind. Machines take charge of all the efficiency of survival; humans retreat to the experience of life itself. Stop worrying about when the machine will take away the bowl of rice in your hands. In that tomorrow of infinitely excessive efficiency, the only card that can truly let you live with dignity is: if you don't rely on work to prove you are useful, do you still know how to make yourself happy?

View original

当机器在任何一件事上都比你更强时，人活着的意义到底还剩什么？ 传记作者艾萨克森在最新访谈里当面追问马斯克，得到的却是一个后院种菜的极简寓言。 如果未来 AI 和机器人什么都比人强，人类存在的意义到底还剩什么？ 马斯克只用了不到一分钟，给出了一个极度平静、但也彻底颠覆工业价值观的回答。 他说：我们人类，最后大概都会变成在后院种菜的人。 现实从一开始就没有侥幸可言， 人类能做到的任何一项具体技能，未来的机器不仅能做，而且成本更低、速度更快、品质更无懈可击。 就像你今天完全不需要在后院顶着大太阳开荒种土豆，街角超市里的蔬菜永远比你亲手种的更便宜、更新鲜。 但今天依然有人喜欢在阳台侍弄几棵番茄，花一整个下午洗菜做饭，只为了给朋友端上一盘自己种出来的菜。 这在纯粹的工业效率上是十足的负资产，但它里面装着一份机器永远算不出来的温度。 过去几百年，现代社会把所有人异化成了追求效率的精密齿轮。 你靠解决问题的能力换取薪水，你的社会地位、存在尊严甚至生存意义，全被有用性三个字绑架得死死的。 可一旦机器把效率推到了物理极限，有用性就瞬间贬值成最廉价的白菜价。 这时候人类不会走向虚无，人类是在经历一场文明级的强制退休。 就像那些退了休却过得无比丰满的老人一样，他们不再需要给任何老板打工，不再需要向任何人证明自己的产出，他们画画、种花、钓鱼，纯粹只是因为自己喜欢。 艾萨克森紧接着追问：那艺术呢？艺术还属于人类吗？ 马斯克的回答更通透直接：你当然可以想创作什么就创作什么。 机器画出来的画、写出来的歌，在技法上可以秒杀所有人。 但人类创作的意义，从来不是为了跟机器比拼技法，而是为了在创作的笨拙过程里，确认自己还在真实地活着。 当谋生的枷锁被机器彻底扯碎，艺术和劳动才真正脱离了功利，回归成纯粹的心灵游戏。 机器负责包揽一切生存的效率，人类退回生命本身的体验。 别再焦虑手头的饭碗什么时候被机器端走了。 在那个效率无限过剩的明天，真正能让你活得体面的唯一底牌是： 如果不靠干活来证明自己有用，你还知不知道怎么让自己快乐？