Meta Releases Entry-Level Model Muse Ember, Focused on Low-Cost AI Agents
Meta has launched its entry-level model Muse Ember, saying it matches Claude Haiku 5.5's score on the Artificial Analysis Index at roughly one-third the price, and surpasses GPT-6 Luna. The model has a 1 million token context window, supports image, audio and video input, and produces outputs of up to 512,000 tokens. It is offered through the Meta Model API at 10 cents per million input tokens and 50 cents per million output tokens, with input dropping to 0.4 cents per million tokens on cache hits. Meta says it is the first model trained using the flagship model Muse Wonder, but did not specify which part of the process was automated.
Why read this
SelectedAI score 76
Meta launches a low-priced model for agent subtasks, with benchmark comparisons and pricing against Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna.
Topics
Body
Meta Platforms Inc. today introduced Muse Ember, an entry-level artificial intelligence model that costs significantly less than the competition.
Notably, it’s the first AI that the company trained using Muse Wonder. The latter algorithm is the Facebook parent’s flagship large language model. Meta didn’t specify which part of the workflow it automated with Muse Wonder.
One possibility is that the company used it to perform post-training, the task of honing a model’s capabilities by training it on additional data. Thinking Machines Labs Inc. recently demonstrated that even a relatively small LLM can run post-training runs end-to-end. Anthropic PBC, for its part, last week revealed that its AI models could soon gain the ability to significantly accelerate machine learning research.
Applications often use frontier LLMs such as Muse Wonder as part of AI ensembles. When a user enters a request, the frontier LLM splits it into smaller tasks and assigns them to agents powered by a lower-cost model. Meta says Muse Ember is specifically optimized to play the latter role.
The company evaluated the model using the Artificial Analysis Index, which aggregates nine AI benchmarks spanning use cases such as coding and financial analysis. Meta says that Muse Ember matched the score of Anthropic’s entry-level Claude Haiku 5.5 model at about a third the price. It also outperformed OpenAI Group PBC’s comparable GPT-6 Luna algorithm.
The same internal evaluation saw Meta test Muse Ember and the two rival models across nine other benchmarks. All three algorithms were in “max” mode, which means they used the maximum amount of hardware at their disposal instead of prioritizing cost-efficiency. Muse Ember outperformed Haiku and Luna across seven of the benchmarks.
The area where the model appears to have the biggest edge is business task automation. Whereas most of Muse Ember’s benchmark results were only a few percentage points better than those of Haiku and Luna, it clocked a 17% lead on AutomationBench-AA. It’s a collection of 657 tasks that span popular cloud applications such as Gmail and Salesforce.
Muse Ember has a context window of 1 million tokens, which enables it to ingest lengthy business documents. Users can also include images, audio and video in their prompts. The model generates responses up to 512,000 tokens in length.
Muse Ember is available through Meta’s Model API for 10 cents per million input tokens and 50 cents per million output tokens. A built-in cache can reuse frequently used prompts to avoid duplicate processing. When the feature is active, Muse Ember’s pricing drops to 0.4 cents per million input tokens.
Image: Meta