Understand this story
The Chinese Academy of Sciences explicitly states in its "Integrity Reminder" that AI may be used to assist in organizing theories, materials, and methods, and for language polishing, translation, and standardization checks; however, it opposes treating AI-generated content as core innovative achievements. This statement delineates the scope of AI's auxiliary use in scientific writing, while making clear that core innovative achievements must not be borne by AI-generated content. There are currently no subsequent developments of fact, and the relevant discussion still revolves around the boundary between AI assistance and AI ghostwriting.
AI-generated from public reports
Developments
1 confirmed developments
- Source:English text is being prepared.
Reports and discussion timeline
Browse reports and discussion by time. Their evidence levels remain distinct.
Sep 1
Electronic Technology Application
"Papers Aren't Written" Book Giveaway: Soliciting Comments on the Boundary Between AI Assistance and AI Ghostwriting
《Electronic Technology Application》 is launching a book giveaway for "Papers Aren't Written: AI Research Thinking Training and Intelligent Collaborative Writing in Practice." From September 1 to 4, opinions will be solicited in the comment section of the "Data Elements Headlines" WeChat official account, and the top 5 by likes will each receive one physical copy of the book. Discussion topics include the boundary between AI assistance and AI ghostwriting, whether it is necessary for journals to strictly regulate the use of AI, and the core abilities of researchers that cannot be replaced in the AI era. The book is authored by Chen Zhe and Li Yixin and published by Publishing House of Electronics Industry.