←DeepSeek
← All topics

DeepSeek

English text is being prepared.

Public reading groups
61
Last 30 days
42
Directory status
Legacy topic

LatestUnsloth releases GGUF version of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Latest reading groups

Duplicate reports of the same fact are grouped

  1. UnslothFirst-partyProduct release
    AI score72

    Unsloth releases GGUF version of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

    Unsloth releases a new GGUF version of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, claiming it ranks highest in benchmark tests. It says Dynamic V3.1 leads on almost all benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, AIME25, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, and Aider, requires more than 64GB of memory to run, and includes links to the GGUF and the blog.

    Why read thisUnsloth has released a GGUF quantized version of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, along with a 64GB memory requirement, making it easier for local deployers to evaluate.

  2. East Money
    AI score76

    DeepSeek's second funding round details revealed: raised 105.5 billion yuan, with nearly 30 institutions including Tencent and ChangXin Memory Technologies participating

    According to The Information, DeepSeek's second funding round has raised 105.5 billion yuan (approximately 15.8 billion US dollars), attracting nearly 30 investors, with state-owned capital contributing about 27%, a sharp increase from 2% in the first round. Tencent invested 10 billion yuan in each of the two rounds; CATL and its chairman Zeng Yuqun invested 5 billion yuan and 10 billion yuan in the two rounds respectively; and industrial parties such as ChangXin Memory Technologies, SMIC, vivo, Meituan, Geely, Midea, Luxshare Precision, Trip.com, and Xiaohongshu are also among the investors. The report, citing people familiar with the matter, said that rising prices for Nvidia's high-end chips and concerns about an AI bubble were the reasons DeepSeek doubled the size of its fundraising midway.

    Why read thisThe funding details disclose the composition of investors and changes in the share of state-owned capital, which can be used to observe DeepSeek's capital structure and the extent of industrial-party participation.

  3. Unite.AI
    AI score86

    CrowdStrike says VAPOR PANDA attacked more than 200 organizations using the DeepSeek-driven ARTEX framework

    CrowdStrike's report states that the China-linked group VAPOR PANDA used an AI-driven intrusion framework called ARTEX, built primarily on the DeepSeek large language model with another commercial model as a secondary component, to target more than 200 organizations in at least 14 countries over 11 days starting October 17, 2026, and confirmed post-compromise activity at 9 of them. ARTEX consists of a main agent and planning and execution sub-agents that share a fact and goal graph; in a single intrusion the planning agent consumed about 1.4 billion input tokens, and operators issued commands in Chinese and intervened at key junctures. CrowdStrike also says the group deployed the BLOODALCHEMY backdoor at some targets, and predicts that China-linked adversaries will increasingly adopt such agent frameworks over the next 12 months.

    Why read thisThe CrowdStrike report discloses the division of labor and scale of an AI agent framework in a real intrusion, offering insight into how automated attacks operate.

  4. PromptArmorFirst-partyAnalysis
    AI score60

    PromptArmor testing found that DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, and Qwen are 88% more susceptible to cyberattacks than…

    PromptArmor tested its most widely circulated attack samples across multiple models and found that DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, and Qwen models are 88% more susceptible to cyberattacks than GPT, Claude, and Gemini models. The tests covered multiple cyber risk dimensions, including susceptibility to phishing, data exfiltration, and running malware, and the authors described the differences as significant.

    Why read thisPromptArmor ran a cross-model comparison using its own widely circulated attack samples, revealing differences between Chinese and foreign models in phishing, data exfiltration, and running malware.

  1. Latent Space
    AI score96

    Anthropic Files S-1 for IPO: $16.3 Billion in First-Half Revenue, $974 Million in Q2 Operating Profit

    Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on Monday, planning to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT, with revenue growing from $41 million in 2023 to $16.3 billion in the first half of 2026, including $11.6 billion in Q2 alone, up 1368% year over year. Q2 operating profit was $974 million, first-half operating cash flow was positive at $3.9 billion, while the $80.7 billion net loss mainly came from $81.1 billion in non-cash financial instrument expenses. About 48% of first-half revenue (roughly $7.8 billion) flowed through Bedrock, Vertex, and Azure Marketplace; the S-1 also disclosed that pretraining of a frontier model was recently delayed, and listed NVIDIA compute commitments of up to $120.5 billion.

    Why read thisThe original article summarizes the key financial figures from Anthropic's S-1 and reactions from various parties, so readers can understand its revenue structure, compute commitments, and points of controversy.

  1. AYi AI NotesOpinion
    AI score76

    Kimi K3.1 Pro Price Compared with Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, Fully Open-Sourced in Early November

    The author compared the prices of Kimi K3.1 Pro, Opus 5.5, and GPT-6 Astra: Kimi K3.1 Pro's input, output, and cache-hit prices are all only one-fifth of GPT-6 Astra's, and its input and output prices are also only half of Opus 5.5's. The author states that Kimi K3.1 Pro comprehensively surpasses Opus 5.5 on coding and terminal tests, and will be fully open-sourced in early November. Another tweet cited gives prices of $2 per million tokens for input, $10 for output, and $0.20 for cache hits, with the Highspeed version charging double for both input and output.

    Why read thisThe author uses price comparisons and benchmark performance to show the impact of open-source models on the closed-source pricing system.

  2. ArenaModel releases
    AI score77

    Kimi K3.1 Pro released, rises to 8th on Code Arena WebDev

    Moonshot AI released Kimi K3.1 Pro, which ranks 8th on Code Arena WebDev with 1,692 points, matching Claude Opus-5 (Max) while costing 70% less, and rising 9 places from Kimi K3 (Max)'s 17th. The model is priced at $2/$10 per million input/output tokens, with a median cost of $1.23 per task, 29% lower than Kimi K3, and its weights will be opened on November 4. Kimi officially calls it a 3T-class open-weight model, featuring a 1M-token context, a 2.8T total parameter/104B active parameter MoE multimodal architecture, and a 65% reduction in hallucination rate.

    Why read thisKimi K3.1 Pro's Code Arena ranking and cost data, directly comparable with Claude Opus-5 and the previous-generation K3.

  3. The ElecModel releases
    AI score82

    Moonshot AI Releases Kimi K3.1 Pro, AA Intelligence Index Score of 55 Surpasses GPT-6 Astra

    Moonshot AI has released Kimi K3.1 Pro, an upgraded version of Kimi K3, featuring a MoE architecture with 2.8 trillion total parameters and 104 billion activated parameters, activating 16 of 896 experts at a time. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, the model ranks fourth on the Intelligence Index with a score of 55, higher than GPT-6 Astra's 53, while the previous generation Kimi K3 scored 44. It ranks first on Terminal Bench 4.0 with 67%, compared with 13% for the previous generation and 64% for Claude Sonnet 5.5; pricing is $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, but its output speed of 73 tokens/s is below the average of 81 tokens/s.

  4. Artificial AnalysisAnalysis
    AI score71

    Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 64% on the Artificial Analysis Cybersecurity Index, ranking first among openly available models

    Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 64% on the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index, 7 points higher than the previous leader among openly available models, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (57%), and 5 points lower than GPT-6 Sol (Daybreak Blue, max, 69%), which is available only through the OpenAI trusted access program. The index consists of three benchmarks: CWE-Bench-AA, DeepsecBench-AA, and CyberGym-E2E-AA. K3.1 Pro achieves 95% on CyberGym-E2E-AA, higher than GPT-6 Sol (Daybreak Blue)'s 93%. Its per-task cost is $2.81, higher than GPT-6 Sol (Daybreak Blue, max)'s $1.77 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's $0.42, because although its per-token price is 33% lower than Kimi K3's, its input token usage is about 2 times as much.

    Why read thisThe leaderboard provides sub-item scores and per-task cost, allowing comparison of the gap between open-weight models and restricted-access models on cybersecurity tasks.

  5. Nathan LambertModel releases
    AI score85

    Kimi K3.1 Pro Released, Intelligence Index Score of 55 Ranks Fourth

    Kimi K3.1 Pro scored 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ranking fourth, an 11-point improvement over Kimi K3's top score of 44. The model shows notable gains in agentic capabilities, scoring 1,846 Elo on GDPval-AA, 312 Elo higher than K3, and 67% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, above K3's 13%. The model has a 1M-token context window, 2.8T total parameters and 104B activated parameters, supports text and image inputs, and is priced at $2, $10, and $0.20 per 1M input, output, and cache-hit tokens respectively, 33% lower than K3; the weights have not yet been released, and Moonshot expects to release them shortly after launch.

  6. Full article from Artificial AnalysisFirst-partyModel releases
    AI score78

    Kimi K3.1 Pro Released, Ranks 4th on Intelligence Index, Will Lead Open-Source Models Once Weights Are Released

    Moonshot AI released the reasoning model Kimi K3.1 Pro, which scores 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ranking 4th, an 11-point improvement over Kimi K3's 44 points, trailing only Claude Opus 5.5 (58), Claude Sonnet 5.5 (56), and Muse Wonder Full (56). Its agent capabilities improved notably: it scores 1,846 Elo on GDPval-AA, ranking 3rd; 67% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Kimi K3 was 13%); and AutomationBench-AA rose from 58% to 73%. The model has a 1M-token context window, 2.8T total parameters and 104B activated parameters, supports text and image input, and is priced at $2/10/0.20 per 1M input/output/cache-hit tokens, all three 33% lower than Kimi K3; the weights have not yet been released, and once released it will become the highest-scoring open-weight model, narrowing the gap between leading open-source and closed-source models from 12 points to 3 points.

    Why read thisThe evaluation organization provides specific scores for Kimi K3.1 Pro on the Intelligence Index and agent benchmarks, and compares its gap with leading closed-source models.

  1. ARC PrizeFirst-partyAnalysis
    AI score73

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores 78.1% on ARC-AGI-2

    ARC Prize announces the results of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on the ARC-AGI validation set: ARC-AGI-2 score 78.1%, cost per task $0.16; ARC-AGI-1 score 94.5%, cost per task $0.06. The best score of the DeepSeek Flash series on ARC-AGI-2 rose from 61.4% for V4 Flash 0731 to 72.9% for V4.1 Flash, and then to 78.1% for V4.1 Flash 1017.

    Why read thisARC Prize provides per-version scores and per-task costs for the DeepSeek Flash series on ARC-AGI, enabling horizontal comparison of model iteration magnitude.

  1. 36Kr · AIModel releases
    AI score80

    Recursive open-sources 40B MoE coding model Flint, runnable on MacBook Pro

    Recursive, founded by Tian Yuandong, has open-sourced its first model Flint, focused on local Agent coding, with 40 billion total parameters, 2.5 billion activated per token, and support for a 512k token context window. The company says that paired with its self-developed inference engine rec, Flint can reach at least 125 tokens/s on a MacBook Pro and over 150 tokens/s on RTX Spark, roughly 1.4–2.6 times higher throughput than llama.cpp. Flint scores 74.2% on SWE-bench Verified, 89.7% on SWE-bench Pro v2, and 54.9% on Terminal-Bench 2.1; rec currently supports M4 Pro, M5 Pro, and M5 Max, requiring at least 48GB of unified memory and about 30GB of free disk space.

    Why read thisTian Yuandong's startup Recursive open-sources its first model, letting readers understand the trade-offs of local Agent coding models in speed and coding benchmarks.

  2. 36Kr · AI
    AI score82

    DeepSeek's hundred-billion financing nears completion, allies with industrial capital including Perfect World and SMIC Capital and bets on embodied intelligence

    According to Bloomberg, DeepSeek's second funding round is locked at about 100 billion yuan, with a pre-money valuation of about 500 billion yuan; the fundraising target was raised twice from the initial 50 billion yuan and then doubled. Existing shareholders Tencent and CATL each added about 10 billion yuan; new entrants include industrial capital such as Shixi Capital, SMIC Capital, CPE Yuanfeng, Legend Capital and Geely. Perfect World, Century Huatong and Litong Electronics participate indirectly through two special funds, Lisi Xingshen and Shixiang Shangshi; DeepSeek is also preparing for a STAR Market IPO and has already invested in embodied intelligence companies such as Unitree.

    Why read thisThe original text sorts out the investor structure and external fund channels of the hundred-billion financing, and gives three investment clues for the embodied intelligence layout.

  3. Tomasz Tunguz blogOpinion
    AI score67

    GPU revenue ladder: from DeepSeek's $38 to SpaceX's $2.44

    Tomasz Tunguz converts the inference data disclosed by DeepSeek and SpaceX's third-quarter financial report into the same basis, yielding four price points for revenue per GPU card-hour, from DeepSeek's theoretical maximum of $38 to SpaceX's actual $2.44. The B200 spot price is $8.77, the SpaceX contract price is $5.27, and the payback period for its new compute deployment is less than one year. The author also points out reverse pressure: GPU rent rose from $4.40 to $8.08 within half a year, while the cost of the equivalent benchmark threshold fell 377 times in 18 months, and JPMorgan says more than 60% of the data center capacity planned for 2027 has not yet started construction.

    Why read thisThe author converts DeepSeek's and SpaceX's data into revenue per card-hour on the same basis, so readers can understand the price space and cost pressure of the inference business.

  1. Yuchen JinOpinion
    AI score80

    DeepSeek's single cluster processes 155 trillion tokens per day, generating $38 in revenue per GPU-hour

    Yuchen Jin, citing data disclosed by DeepSeek, said that a single cluster currently processes 155 trillion tokens per day and generates $38 in revenue per GPU-hour (off-peak pricing). He noted that DeepSeek has not only open-sourced its inference engine but also disclosed revenue figures, though it did not specify which GPU models were used; DeepInfer supports both NVIDIA Blackwell and Huawei Ascend. Based on an estimated B300 rental price of $7 per GPU-hour, the gross margin is approximately 82%.

    Why read thisThe author estimates gross margin using publicly available per-GPU-hour revenue and GPU rental costs, providing a reference point for assessing the economics of inference services.

  1. Latent SpaceProduct release
    AI score85

    DeepSeek open-sources the DeepInfer inference framework, processing 155 trillion tokens per day in a single cluster

    DeepSeek has open-sourced DeepInfer, its self-developed inference framework that supports DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, and published production data: a single cluster processes 155 trillion tokens per day, 96% input cache hit rate, 400ms first-token latency, and 230 tokens/s generation speed. The framework is customized based on vLLM and supports distributed inference, speculative decoding, SWA Bounded Replay, and structured output, with target platforms NVIDIA SM100 and Huawei Ascend 950. DeepSeek also states that components such as KV cache management and load balancing are not yet fully open-sourced, while the vLLM team says that under a matching GB200 configuration, decoding throughput is within 6% of the results published by DeepInfer.

    Why read thisThe original article puts DeepInfer's production data, cache tiering, and vLLM reproduction comparison together, making it easier to judge the transferable boundaries of this inference stack.

  2. Artificial AnalysisAnalysis
    AI score71

    MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13 points higher than MiniMax-M3, at less than half the latter's per-task cost. It scores 48% on Humanity's Last Exam and 22% on CritPt, both higher than GLM-5.3-Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash, and slightly lower than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. The model has a 1M-token context window, supports text and image input, is priced at $0.15/$0.60 per 1M input/output tokens, and its weights are currently closed-source; MiniMax announced that it will open the weights on October 23.

    Why read thisThird-party benchmarks compare this model with Flash models in the same tier on scores, token consumption, and per-task cost, which can be used to assess its price-performance position.

  3. ArenaAnalysis
    AI score71

    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20261017 Tops the Agent Arena Open-Model Leaderboard

    Arena.ai says DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20261017 (Max) has become the top-ranked open-source model in Agent Arena, ranking 11th overall, with a net improvement of 5.1% across more than 7.5K real sessions. The model's median cost per task is $0.20, roughly 37% of GPT-6.1 Sol's improvement margin and 27% of its cost; it ranks first among open-source models on all four signals—Confirmed Success, Praise vs. Complaint, Bash Reliability, and Steerability—and shows no tool-hallucination issues.

    Why read thisAgent Arena's empirical leaderboard shows that DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has entered the top ranks at a lower cost, allowing readers to compare the cost-effectiveness of open-source and closed-source models.

  4. UnslothFirst-partyProduct release
    AI score79

    Unsloth Enables Local Running of DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017

    Unsloth announced that DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017 now supports local running; its 1-bit quantized version retains about 88.2% accuracy, with size reduced from 508GB to 250GB, a 52% decrease. This version requires a device with more than 128GB of memory, and Unsloth also provided a usage guide and GGUF files. DeepSeek previously stated that V4.1-Flash-1017 improved over the previous version in benchmark performance, task completion speed, and output length.

    Why read thisUnsloth provided the accuracy retention ratio and size change after 1-bit quantization, so readers can judge the local deployment threshold accordingly.