English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary
←Search results
English text is being prepared.
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary
Databricks executive discusses AI coding cost governance and Unity Gateway
On October 23, 2026, Databricks product lead Patrick reviewed the cost overrun problem after the company fully adopted AI coding agents, shared lessons on AI coding cost governance, and productized the internal solution as the Unity Gateway control layer. According to him, governance measures include migrating to cheaper models, routing, spend visibility, and cutting token overhead, with unit costs in some scenarios dropping by up to 90%. He noted that hard budget caps would interrupt the best developers, so they switched to gradual friction through warnings, approvals, and model downgrades. The team also built its own evaluation using real PRs from its own codebase, finding that GLM 5.2 matched Opus 4.8 in quality at about one-third lower cost per task, while a model that was 1.7 times cheaper per token ended up more expensive per task because it consumed more tokens.
On October 23, 2026, Databricks product lead Patrick reviewed the cost overrun problem after the company fully adopted AI coding agents, shared lessons on AI coding cost governance, and productized the internal solution as the Unity Gateway control layer. According to him, governance measures include migrating to cheaper models, routing, spend visibility, and cutting token overhead, with unit costs in some scenarios dropping by up to 90%. He noted that hard budget caps would interrupt the best d
Matched fieldsTitle
Databricks executive discusses AI coding cost governance and Unity Gateway
On October 23, 2026, Databricks product lead Patrick reviewed the cost overrun problem after the company fully adopted AI coding agents, shared lessons on AI coding cost governance, and productized the internal solution as the Unity Gateway control layer. According to him, governance measures include migrating to cheaper models, routing, spend visibility, and cutting token overhead, with unit costs in some scenarios dropping by up to 90%. He noted that hard budget caps would interrupt the best developers, so they switched to gradual friction through warnings, approvals, and model downgrades. The team also built its own evaluation using real PRs from its own codebase, finding that GLM 5.2 matched Opus 4.8 in quality at about one-third lower cost per task, while a model that was 1.7 times cheaper per token ended up more expensive per task because it consumed more tokens.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:Databricks executive discusses AI coding cost governance and Unity Gateway
Recursive releases open-weight local coding model Flint
On October 21, 2026, Recursive Superintelligence released Flint, an open-weight local coding model. According to related reports, Flint is a 40B mixture-of-experts model that activates approximately 2.5B parameters per token, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and its weights have been made available on Hugging Face; it was built from scratch in under 4 months by the automated research system Eureka Machine. On October 22, Hugging Face co-founder Thomas Wolf commented that Recursive researchers quantized the lm_head—which is usually recommended to be kept at high precision—to 4 bits, and the result differed from bf16 by only 0.7 percentage points. On the same day, OpenRouter launched Flint, saying it is aimed at coding agents, supports a 262K context, reasoning, and tool calling, and is free to use during the launch period; Unsloth released a Dynamic GGUF quantized version of Flint, saying it can run locally on devices with 24GB of memory. The model now offers multiple usage paths through open weights, hosting platforms, and quantized versions.
On October 21, 2026, Recursive Superintelligence released Flint, an open-weight local coding model. According to related reports, Flint is a 40B mixture-of-experts model that activates approximately 2.5B parameters per token, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and its weights have been made available on Hugging Face; it was built from scratch in under 4 months by the automated research system Eureka Machine. On October 22, Hugging Face co-founder Thomas Wolf commented that Recursive researchers quant
Matched fieldsTitle
Jediah Katz proposes that Harness coding patches are being absorbed by models
On October 21, 2026, Jediah Katz, head of Grok Bot and Cursor Harness, offered the judgment that the part of Harness that helps models write code is being absorbed by models, and that fancy Harness no longer increases models' coding ability. He also stated that the three responsibilities of opening up new task boundaries, providing infrastructure and trust/security, and optimizing efficiency still cannot do without Harness. Citing UC Berkeley tests on SWE-bench Lite and Apple and EPFL tests on MLE-Bench, he said that score differences across different Harness are not significant, but per-task cost differences are obvious. He also predicted that within 6 months, 90% of Agent work will leave personal computers and run in the cloud. Currently this judgment is reported by a single source, with no subsequent factual developments yet.
On October 21, 2026, Jediah Katz, head of Grok Bot and Cursor Harness, offered the judgment that the part of Harness that helps models write code is being absorbed by models, and that fancy Harness no longer increases models' coding ability. He also stated that the three responsibilities of opening up new task boundaries, providing infrastructure and trust/security, and optimizing efficiency still cannot do without Harness. Citing UC Berkeley tests on SWE-bench Lite and Apple and EPFL tests on M
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
On October 21, 2026, Jediah Katz, head of Grok Bot and Cursor Harness, offered the judgment that the part of Harness that helps models write code is being absorbed by models, and that fancy Harness no longer increases models' coding ability. He also stated that the three responsibilities of opening up new task boundaries, providing infrastructure and trust/security, and optimizing efficiency still cannot do without Harness. Citing UC Berkeley tests on SWE-bench Lite and Apple and EPFL tests on MLE-Bench, he said that score differences across different Harness are not significant, but per-task cost differences are obvious. He also predicted that within 6 months, 90% of Agent work will leave personal computers and run in the cloud. Currently this judgment is reported by a single source, with no subsequent factual developments yet.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:Jediah Katz proposes that Harness coding patches are being absorbed by models
Jellyfish discloses data on the share of PRs merged by autonomous coding agents
Jellyfish disclosed data on the share of PRs written and merged by autonomous coding agents. Its analysis, based on data from about 300,000 engineers at 1,300 companies, shows that at the median enterprise, autonomous coding agents have already written 22% of merged PRs, up from 18% a month earlier, with the top 10% of companies reaching 53%. However, the median share of PRs independently reviewed and merged by agents is only 0.6%, and 9% for the top 10%, with human review remaining the main bottleneck. The data also shows that the abandonment rate for PRs submitted by agents is 40%, versus 20% for humans, and that the number of human reviews each merged agent PR receives has more than doubled over the past year.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:Jellyfish discloses data on the share of merged PRs by autonomous coding agents
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
Jellyfish discloses data on the share of merged PRs by autonomous coding agents
Jellyfish disclosed data on the share of PRs written and merged by autonomous coding agents. Its analysis, based on data from about 300,000 engineers at 1,300 companies, shows that at the median enterprise, autonomous coding agents have already written 22% of merged PRs, up from 18% a month earlier, with the top 10% of companies reaching 53%. However, the median share of PRs independently reviewed and merged by agents is only 0.6%, and 9% for the top 10%, with human review remaining the main bottleneck. The data also shows that the abandonment rate for PRs submitted by agents is 40%, versus 20% for humans, and that the number of human reviews each merged agent PR receives has more than doubled over the past year.
Jellyfish disclosed data on the share of PRs written and merged by autonomous coding agents. Its analysis, based on data from about 300,000 engineers at 1,300 companies, shows that at the median enterprise, autonomous coding agents have already written 22% of merged PRs, up from 18% a month earlier, with the top 10% of companies reaching 53%. However, the median share of PRs independently reviewed and merged by agents is only 0.6%, and 9% for the top 10%, with human review remaining the main bot
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle