←Search results

By relevance · Total 398 results Clear search

Wednesday

Wednesday

Wednesday

Friday

Tuesday

Thursday

Friday

  1. Shao Meng

    Addy on how to use Claude Code in the Claude Opus 5.5 era

    Addy Osmani discusses how to use Claude Code in the Claude Opus 5.5 era, arguing that starting with the Claude 5 series, users should reduce piling up prompts and hand-holding task breakdowns, and instead use a single prompt that clearly states the goal and acceptance criteria, letting the model run to completion on its own and then stop. He recommends starting from /effort medium; when the goal is unclear, first have Claude interview you to produce a spec, then open a new session to implement it. For Claude Opus 5 and Claude Fable 5, he removed more than 80% of the Claude Code system prompt, with no noticeable drop in coding benchmarks. He also mentioned that the Claude Code interactive terminal recently defaulted to auto mode, and said this is not a safety guarantee; sub-agents should be split less by hand, and a single agent plus skills often yields better quality.

    ium; when the goal is unclear, first have Claude interview you to produce a spec, then open a new session to implement it. For Claude Opus 5 and Claude Fable 5, he removed more than 80% of the Claude Code system prompt, with no noticeable drop in coding benchmarks. He also mentioned that the Claude Code interactive terminal recently defaulted to auto mode, and said this is not a safety guarantee; sub-agents should be split less by hand, and a single agent plus skills often yields better quality.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Thursday

  1. Artificial AnalysisSelected

    Artificial Analysis tests GitHub Copilot Fusion: $5.59 cost per task…

    In Coding Agent Index v2.0, Artificial Analysis benchmarked GitHub Copilot's Copilot Fusion, which costs $5.59 per task, compared with $11.42 for Claude Code with Opus 5.5 (max), while performing only 2 points lower. Copilot Fusion is a runtime orchestration system that selects and coordinates among Anthropic and OpenAI models such as Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-6 Sol. It leads on Terminal-Bench 4.0 with a score of 71, ranks third on FrontierCode with 51 points, and uses 7.2M tokens per task, about half that of Opus 5.5 in Claude Code.

    In Coding Agent Index v2.0, Artificial Analysis benchmarked GitHub Copilot's Copilot Fusion, which costs $5.59 per task, compared with $11.42 for Claude Code with Opus 5.5 (max), while performing only 2 points lower. Copilot Fusion is a runtime orchestration system that selects and coordinates among Anthropic and OpenAI models such as Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-6 Sol. It leads on Terminal-Bench 4.0 with a score of 71, ranks third on FrontierCode with 51 points, and

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. Artificial AnalysisSelected

    Gemini 4 Carbon Tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index…

    Artificial Analysis evaluations show that Google's Gemini 4 Carbon tops Intelligence Index v5 with 59 points, ranking first in four of the 9 evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, and AutomationBench-AA. On the Coding Agent Index, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) paired with Antigravity CLI scores 59 points, 3 points behind Claude Code paired with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62 points). The model is currently available only to some users and has not yet been publicly released; it is priced at $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens with a 50% discount, has a 1M-token context window, and supports text, image, video, and voice input.

    n tops Intelligence Index v5 with 59 points, ranking first in four of the 9 evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, and AutomationBench-AA. On the Coding Agent Index, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) paired with Antigravity CLI scores 59 points, 3 points behind Claude Code paired with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62 points). The model is currently available only to some users and has not yet been publicly released; it is priced at $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens with a 50% discount, h

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Wednesday

  1. NVIDIA Developer · Generative AI

    NVIDIA Explains How to Fine-Tune Nemotron 3.5 Lightning with the Nemotron-Personas Dataset

    NVIDIA has released the Nemotron-Personas France and Belgium datasets and provided a complete post-training workflow for fine-tuning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning with them. The workflow includes defining behavior contracts, generating synthetic conversations with personas, fine-tuning with LoRA on NVIDIA NeMo, merging adapters, and then comparing and evaluating item by item against the base model on a frozen test set. The France dataset was built in collaboration with Pleias, and the Belgium dataset involved Pleias and KU Leuven; the Nemotron repository provides reusable steps and agent skills for data generation, training, and evaluation.

    Flowchart showing eight stages: define target behavior and a holdout set, sample personas, generate conversations, audit and split data, fine-tune with LoRA, merge the adapter, serve the adapted model, and evaluate it against the base model.

    3.5 Lightning with them. The workflow includes defining behavior contracts, generating synthetic conversations with personas, fine-tuning with LoRA on NVIDIA NeMo, merging adapters, and then comparing and evaluating item by item against the base model on a frozen test set. The France dataset was built in collaboration with Pleias, and the Belgium dataset involved Pleias and KU Leuven; the Nemotron repository provides reusable steps and agent skills for data generation, training, and evaluation.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. LangChain BlogSelected

    How LangChain Built the Design Agent Content Studio

    LangChain's GTM engineering team, working with the design team, built Content Studio, a design agent inside Slack, on Managed Deep Agents. It can generate videos, social graphics, UI mockups, and slide decks, and has already produced more than 3,000 assets and over 80 slide decks. The article breaks down its four-layer knowledge structure (skills, wiki, code validation, memory), the dedicated LangSmith Sandbox for each Slack thread, the two rendering engines HyperFrames and the in-house motion-studio, and how the main agent orchestrates asynchronous sub-agents. The team says that after migrating to Managed Deep Agents, its own code shrank by about 80%, the median model cost per request fell from about $8 in mid-September to about 50 cents, and the entire harness has been open-sourced.

    Shreya Talegaonkar

    LangChain's GTM engineering team, working with the design team, built Content Studio, a design agent inside Slack, on Managed Deep Agents. It can generate videos, social graphics, UI mockups, and slide decks, and has already produced more than 3,000 assets and over 80 slide decks. The article breaks down its four-layer knowledge structure (skills, wiki, code validation, memory), the dedicated LangSmith Sandbox for each Slack thread, the two rendering engines HyperFrames and the in-house motion-s

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  3. Full Artificial Analysis articleSelected

    Gemini 4 Carbon Tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5

    Google's Gemini 4 Carbon ranks first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 with a score of 59, leading in four of the 9 evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, and AutomationBench-AA. On the Coding Agent Index, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) paired with the Antigravity CLI scores 59, trailing Claude Code paired with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62 points) by 3 points. The model has a 1M-token context window, supports text, image, video, and speech input, and is priced at a standard rate of $4/$20 per million input/output tokens; it is currently available to select users with a 50% discount.

    Analysis Intelligence Index v5 with a score of 59, leading in four of the 9 evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, and AutomationBench-AA. On the Coding Agent Index, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) paired with the Antigravity CLI scores 59, trailing Claude Code paired with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62 points) by 3 points. The model has a 1M-token context window, supports text, image, video, and speech input, and is priced at a standard rate of $4/$20 per million input/output tokens

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Monday

  1. KazikeSelected

    Retrofitting a TV, Fill Lights, and a Camera with Codex and Claude

    The author shared the process of using Codex and Claude to reverse engineer and retrofit real-world devices: first enable ADB debugging on the TV, then have the Agent disable system packages, clear boot ads, and rebuild a clean launcher, and replicate the same method on three other TVs. The team also used Claude to reverse engineer 4 fill lights and built a unified web console, and used Codex to build a multi-camera console for a Sony camera and a DJI Pocket 3 and deploy it to Feishu. The author reminds that different brands of devices expose different interfaces and permissions, and that backups should be made before modifying system software.

    The author shared the process of using Codex and Claude to reverse engineer and retrofit real-world devices: first enable ADB debugging on the TV, then have the Agent disable system packages, clear boot ads, and rebuild a clean launcher, and replicate the same method on three other TVs. The team also used Claude to reverse engineer 4 fill lights and built a unified web console, and used Codex to build a multi-camera console for a Sony camera and a DJI Pocket 3 and deploy it to Feishu. The author

    Matched fieldsSummary

Sunday

  1. LangChain BlogSelected

    LangChain summarizes the five components for building company-level agents

    Harrison Chase and Caspar Broekhuizen of LangChain published an article summarizing the five core components shared by its three internal agents for marketing, sales, and engineering: agents live in existing workplaces such as Slack, a distinction between acting on behalf of users and a fixed identity, global and user-level memory, code execution within a sandbox, and a large number of runs triggered by schedules or events. The article uses GTM Agent, OpenSWE, and Content Studio as examples to explain their specific approaches to identity, memory, and code execution, all three of which are built on Managed Deep Agents.

    Harrison Chase and Caspar Broekhuizen of LangChain published an article summarizing the five core components shared by its three internal agents for marketing, sales, and engineering: agents live in existing workplaces such as Slack, a distinction between acting on behalf of users and a fixed identity, global and user-level memory, code execution within a sandbox, and a large number of runs triggered by schedules or events. The article uses GTM Agent, OpenSWE, and Content Studio as examples to e

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Saturday

  1. Artificial Analysis

    Artificial Analysis measured Meta Muse Spark Open inference throughput

    Artificial Analysis published preliminary test results on AA-AgentPerf for Meta's new open-weight model Muse Spark Open, an 816B-parameter, 42B-active MoE that scores 39 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Tests show NVIDIA B300 and GB300 each reach about 150M tokens/s per megawatt under throughput-first configurations, with GB300 at about 108M and B300 at about 92M at 100 tok/s output speed; AMD MI355X reaches 70M tokens/s per megawatt at 65 tok/s. 46 of the model's 62 layers use 2,048-token sliding window attention, reducing KV cache requirements at 1M context by about 75% versus full attention; Meta released an NVFP4 checkpoint and AMD released an MXFP4 checkpoint.

    Artificial Analysis published preliminary test results on AA-AgentPerf for Meta's new open-weight model Muse Spark Open, an 816B-parameter, 42B-active MoE that scores 39 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Tests show NVIDIA B300 and GB300 each reach about 150M tokens/s per megawatt under throughput-first configurations, with GB300 at about 108M and B300 at about 92M at 100 tok/s output speed; AMD MI355X reaches 70M tokens/s per megawatt at 65 tok/s. 46 of the model's 62 layers use 2,0

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. AWS Machine Learning

    Amazon SageMaker AI Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning Practical Guide: Training gpt-oss-20b with a Wordle Example

    AWS has published a practical guide for multi-turn reinforcement learning (MTRL) on Amazon SageMaker AI. Using Wordle as an example, it deploys the agent and reward function to Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, and the training job updates LoRA adapters via GRPO. In the example, gpt-oss-20b at default reasoning effort improved its solve rate on held-out words from 61% to 84%, at a training token cost of about $339 and an AgentCore runtime cost of about $79. The article also details failures such as two inverted reward design errors, token invalidation under concurrency, and tool calls degrading into plain text, and recommends evaluating under the decoding settings used in final serving.

    SageMaker AI training job connected to the AgentCore-hosted agent, Wordle environment, and reward function

    AWS has published a practical guide for multi-turn reinforcement learning (MTRL) on Amazon SageMaker AI. Using Wordle as an example, it deploys the agent and reward function to Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, and the training job updates LoRA adapters via GRPO. In the example, gpt-oss-20b at default reasoning effort improved its solve rate on held-out words from 61% to 84%, at a training token cost of about $339 and an AgentCore runtime cost of about $79. The article also details failures such as two

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Friday

  1. MarkTechPost

    TinyFish Breaks Down Production-Grade Agent Search Architecture and Deep Research Experience

    TinyFish released two technical guides: one defines a production-grade agent search architecture, and the other summarizes lessons from building a deep research system. The architecture is built on four web primitives—TinySearch, TinyFetch, TinyBrowser, and TinyAgent—and runs a seven-stage control loop around a foundation model, covering task definition, retrieval planning, tool routing, evidence evaluation, and failure retry. In OpenBenchmarks tests with a fixed gpt-5.6-sol model and 100 tasks, TinyFish search plus fetch achieved a 79.0% completion rate, with a median task cost of $0.050 and a runtime of 24 seconds; under a search-only configuration, the completion rate was 59.3%.

    TinyFish released two technical guides: one defines a production-grade agent search architecture, and the other summarizes lessons from building a deep research system. The architecture is built on four web primitives—TinySearch, TinyFetch, TinyBrowser, and TinyAgent—and runs a seven-stage control loop around a foundation model, covering task definition, retrieval planning, tool routing, evidence evaluation, and failure retry. In OpenBenchmarks tests with a fixed gpt-5.6-sol model and 100 tasks,

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. Alibaba Cloud Developer Community AI

    What robots.txt can and cannot control for AI crawlers

    robots.txt is only a crawling permission declaration, not access control; it can only constrain which paths compliant crawlers may fetch, and cannot control non-compliant crawlers, content that has already leaked, or acquisition methods that do not go through crawlers. Following RFC 9309, the article explains rules such as User-agent, Allow, Disallow, and the 500 KiB read limit, and provides robots.txt syntax for blocking GPTBot, CCBot, ClaudeBot, and Bytespider by UA, as well as methods for using nginx to apply differentiated rate limiting by UA, using logs to count request volumes per crawler, and using curl to verify whether rate limiting takes effect. The author emphasizes that robots.txt expresses intent, server-side rate limiting controls costs, logs reveal the facts, and licensing agreements address legal issues—each of the four handles a distinct part.

    ontrol non-compliant crawlers, content that has already leaked, or acquisition methods that do not go through crawlers. Following RFC 9309, the article explains rules such as User-agent, Allow, Disallow, and the 500 KiB read limit, and provides robots.txt syntax for blocking GPTBot, CCBot, ClaudeBot, and Bytespider by UA, as well as methods for using nginx to apply differentiated rate limiting by UA, using logs to count request volumes per crawler, and using curl to verify whether rate limiting

    Matched fieldsSummary

Thursday

  1. AWS Machine Learning

    AWS team open-sources multi-agent system Deep Insight, breaking down five major challenges in production environments

    The AWS Solutions Architecture team built and open-sourced the multi-agent system Deep Insight, which can transform CSV data and natural language prompts into cited .docx analysis reports. The system consists of eight agents—Coordinator, Planner, Supervisor, Coder, Validator, Reporter, Tracker, and others—collaborating in layers, controlling execution flow based on the Graph and Agents-as-Tools patterns of the Strands Agents SDK, and selecting Claude Haiku, Opus, and Sonnet by role. Production deployment relies on the Amazon Bedrock AgentCore runtime; LLM-generated code is executed in isolation within per-session ephemeral containers on AWS Fargate, accompanied by a Web UI and an Ops dashboard.

    Deep Insight architecture: the Strands Agents multi-agent layer on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, with an Application Load Balancer routing code execution to AWS Fargate containers in a private VPC

    The AWS Solutions Architecture team built and open-sourced the multi-agent system Deep Insight, which can transform CSV data and natural language prompts into cited .docx analysis reports. The system consists of eight agents—Coordinator, Planner, Supervisor, Coder, Validator, Reporter, Tracker, and others—collaborating in layers, controlling execution flow based on the Graph and Agents-as-Tools patterns of the Strands Agents SDK, and selecting Claude Haiku, Opus, and Sonnet by role. Production d

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Wednesday