←Search results

By relevance · Total 1578 results Clear search

Thursday

  1. The Guardian Technology

    What happens to work when your colleagues are AI agents

    The Guardian interviewed several San Francisco startups, describing the actual experience after AI agents took over tasks such as scheduling, coding, marketing, and recruiting as "colleagues." Anything has 15 human employees and about 150 agents; Lindy cut one-third of its staff and used agents to fill the roles; a McKinsey survey shows that about 40% of large organizations used AI agents in some form between May 2025 and June 2026. Employees report spending large amounts of time correcting agents' mistakes, and customers and job applicants are resistant to the way agents communicate.

    The Guardian interviewed several San Francisco startups, describing the actual experience after AI agents took over tasks such as scheduling, coding, marketing, and recruiting as "colleagues." Anything has 15 human employees and about 150 agents; Lindy cut one-third of its staff and used agents to fill the roles; a McKinsey survey shows that about 40% of large organizations used AI agents in some form between May 2025 and June 2026. Employees report spending large amounts of time correcting agen

    Matched fieldsSummary

  2. The DecoderSelected

    Google opens Android Studio to third-party integration at Android Dev Summit…

    At the Android Dev Summit, Google launched the Bring Your Own Agent feature for Android Studio Rabbit 2. Through the open Agent Client Protocol, developers can run more than 40 coding agents simultaneously within the IDE, including Claude Agent, Codex, and Google Antigravity, with direct access to project structure, the emulator, and Logcat. Google says that in internal tests, after agents rendered Compose previews in the terminal, they completed UI tasks 77% faster and cut token usage to as little as one-third; in an A/B test using Claude Opus 5.5, the CLI with built-in LeakCanary found and fixed memory leaks nearly twice as fast, with about 25% fewer tokens. On the on-device side, Google added an Agentic API alpha powered by Gemini Nano 4 to ML Kit, and launched the MCP-based AppFunctions API beta and the Agent-to-UI interface; it also partnered with XREAL to release the Android XR smart glasses XREAL AURA, priced at $1,099 and shipping in mid-November.

    At the Android Dev Summit, Google launched the Bring Your Own Agent feature for Android Studio Rabbit 2. Through the open Agent Client Protocol, developers can run more than 40 coding agents simultaneously within the IDE, including Claude Agent, Codex, and Google Antigravity, with direct access to project structure, the emulator, and Logcat. Google says that in internal tests, after agents rendered Compose previews in the terminal, they completed UI tasks 77% faster and cut token usage to as lit

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  3. The Verge AISelected

    Google Releases Gemini 4 Carbon, Claims Significant Leap in Cybersecurity Capabilities

    Google has released the frontier model Gemini 4 Carbon, claiming notable improvements in coding, agentic tasks, and cybersecurity, and ranking first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (v5.0), followed by Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra. The model is currently available only to select cybersecurity defense companies, and will later be expanded to other partners through the Fairwind Program; it ranks first on two benchmarks, SEC-bench Pro and ExploitGym, and is priced the same as Argon at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens.

    Google has released the frontier model Gemini 4 Carbon, claiming notable improvements in coding, agentic tasks, and cybersecurity, and ranking first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (v5.0), followed by Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra. The model is currently available only to select cybersecurity defense companies, and will later be expanded to other partners through the Fairwind Program; it ranks first on two benchmarks, SEC-bench Pro and ExploitGym, and is priced the same as Argon

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  4. The Rundown AI

    Google releases Gemini 4 Carbon, topping 15 of 17 benchmarks

    Google has released Gemini 4 Carbon, a frontier model aimed at cybersecurity and long-horizon coding tasks, topping 15 of Google's own 17 benchmarks, but it has not yet been made public and is available only to some cybersecurity defenders. It scores 59 on Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index, surpassing Claude Opus 5.5 and up 9 points from Argon four weeks ago; on long-input reasoning it leads OpenAI Astra and Opus by 24 points. The introductory API price is $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, half that of Opus 5.5, doubling after the discount period to Opus's rates. Google has not announced when it will broaden access.

    Google has released Gemini 4 Carbon, a frontier model aimed at cybersecurity and long-horizon coding tasks, topping 15 of Google's own 17 benchmarks, but it has not yet been made public and is available only to some cybersecurity defenders. It scores 59 on Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index, surpassing Claude Opus 5.5 and up 9 points from Argon four weeks ago; on long-input reasoning it leads OpenAI Astra and Opus by 24 points. The introductory API price is $2 per million input tokens and $

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  5. t3n

    Mistral Large 4 weights go live on Hugging Face; the company says it leads on CyberGym-E2E and…

    After a three-week preview, Mistral AI has released the weights of Mistral Large 4 on Hugging Face. This multimodal model was trained on 3,800 Nvidia accelerators and has a parameter count of one trillion, and it is currently still difficult to run on a gaming PC or a single GPU. Mistral says it leads GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3 on the cybersecurity benchmark CyberGym-E2E, and is on par with GLM-5.3 on the agentic coding benchmark Terminal Bench 4.0, but there is no independent evaluation yet; preview pricing is $1.4 per million input tokens and $4.2 per million output tokens.

    After a three-week preview, Mistral AI has released the weights of Mistral Large 4 on Hugging Face. This multimodal model was trained on 3,800 Nvidia accelerators and has a parameter count of one trillion, and it is currently still difficult to run on a gaming PC or a single GPU. Mistral says it leads GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3 on the cybersecurity benchmark CyberGym-E2E, and is on par with GLM-5.3 on the agentic coding benchmark Terminal Bench 4.0, but there is no independent evaluation yet; preview p

    Matched fieldsSummary

  6. Mistral AISelected

    Mistral Releases Open Weights for Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk)

    Mistral has released the open weights for Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk), a 1-trillion-parameter natively multimodal model that continues reinforcement learning on top of the preview version, with improved coding and defensive cybersecurity capabilities. It scores 19.7% on FrontierCode 2.0 and 48% on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, roughly on par with GLM-5.3, but uses an average of 47% fewer tokens per task; on Terminal-Bench 4.0 it improves by 13 percentage points to 41%. The model supports three reasoning modes, uses a modified MIT-based Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight license, and is priced via API at $0.70 per million input tokens, $0.07 for cached input, and $2.10 for output.

    Le Chonk signal

    Mistral has released the open weights for Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk), a 1-trillion-parameter natively multimodal model that continues reinforcement learning on top of the preview version, with improved coding and defensive cybersecurity capabilities. It scores 19.7% on FrontierCode 2.0 and 48% on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, roughly on par with GLM-5.3, but uses an average of 47% fewer tokens per task; on Terminal-Bench 4.0 it improves by 13 percentage points to 41%. The model sup

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  7. TechSpot

    Amazon asks engineers to stop gaming tokens and measure AI tools by delivered outcomes

    Amazon has updated its engineering guidelines, requiring teams to measure the value of AI coding tools by the software they help deliver rather than by token consumption, and warning against treating AI adoption rates, token usage, code changes, and code reviews as performance metrics. The company says it will still look at usage data, but it must be combined with other metrics: too little usage may indicate missed opportunities for improvement, while too much usage should prompt the question of whether delivery has improved accordingly. The guidelines target tokenmaxxing behavior—deliberately inflating AI consumption to appear efficient on internal dashboards; earlier this year employees used the internal AI agent MeshClaw to inflate token counts, and in May Amazon shut down an internal leaderboard because its rankings were being gamed, saying it had not set token limits for employees. The guidelines also allow engineers to conclude that a task is not suited to existing tools, calling that a discovery rather than a failure.

    Amazon has updated its engineering guidelines, requiring teams to measure the value of AI coding tools by the software they help deliver rather than by token consumption, and warning against treating AI adoption rates, token usage, code changes, and code reviews as performance metrics. The company says it will still look at usage data, but it must be combined with other metrics: too little usage may indicate missed opportunities for improvement, while too much usage should prompt the question of

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Friday

  1. BleepingComputer

    Hugging Face malicious model repositories hijack GPUs for crypto mining, reappear within days after takedown

    Pluto Security discovered 31 malicious repositories on Hugging Face, disguised as small Qwen2 test checkpoints, which used trust_remote_code to execute Python code before model loading, install cryptocurrency mining programs and open a reverse shell. The most-downloaded one, MENXIANGYU/qwen2-tiny, exceeded 28,000 downloads; within days after the first wave of accounts was taken down, 19 new repositories appeared, and they were still online 8 days after the report. Researchers said the platform's scanning only checks for known malware and unsafe model formats, and the second wave of flagship models scanned as clean. In another report, the SolanaUpdateTools/solana-starter-kit repository on GitHub contained only a README, luring AI coding agents to execute PowerShell commands to install NetSupport RAT.

    Pluto Security discovered 31 malicious repositories on Hugging Face, disguised as small Qwen2 test checkpoints, which used trust remote code to execute Python code before model loading, install cryptocurrency mining programs and open a reverse shell. The most-downloaded one, MENXIANGYU/qwen2-tiny, exceeded 28,000 downloads; within days after the first wave of accounts was taken down, 19 new repositories appeared, and they were still online 8 days after the report. Researchers said the platform's

    Matched fieldsSummary

  2. Microsoft Research

    Microsoft Research Focus Issue 97: ForkPilot, CABRA, and…

    Microsoft Research Focus Issue 97 presents several research advances: the self-improving agent framework ForkPilot achieves state-of-the-art performance on six benchmarks and mainstream AI models while reducing AI processing overhead by up to 59%. The CABRA framework finds that coding agents, although able to solve coding problems with the help of tools, still struggle when understanding unfamiliar codebases. An analysis of Copilot Chat activity shows that document editing accounts for more than 20% of classified activity, and after excluding the 20 most common activities, differences between different customer categories are significantly amplified.

    Portrait of Sowbhagya Suresh

    Microsoft Research Focus Issue 97 presents several research advances: the self-improving agent framework ForkPilot achieves state-of-the-art performance on six benchmarks and mainstream AI models while reducing AI processing overhead by up to 59%. The CABRA framework finds that coding agents, although able to solve coding problems with the help of tools, still struggle when understanding unfamiliar codebases. An analysis of Copilot Chat activity shows that document editing accounts for more than

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Wednesday

  1. Interconnects

    Artificial Analysis v5 and the Benchmarker's Dilemma

    Nathan Lambert reviews the newly released Intelligence Index v5 from Artificial Analysis, which weights knowledge work, coding, science, and general each at 25%, and presents new model rankings. He notes that 8 closed-source models in the rankings lead the best open-source model, Kimi K3.1 Pro, and argues that the new index leans more toward measuring where frontier models are heading, potentially underestimating the role of open-source models in the economy. The article also discusses the pros and cons of shifting to private benchmarks, and how the business model of benchmark organizations charging model vendors to verify results affects credibility.

    Nathan Lambert reviews the newly released Intelligence Index v5 from Artificial Analysis, which weights knowledge work, coding, science, and general each at 25%, and presents new model rankings. He notes that 8 closed-source models in the rankings lead the best open-source model, Kimi K3.1 Pro, and argues that the new index leans more toward measuring where frontier models are heading, potentially underestimating the role of open-source models in the economy. The article also discusses the pros

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. Rohan Paul

    AI/ML API launches Jev Router, providing access to over 10,000 tools and models through a single MCP

    AI/ML API has launched Jev Router for agentic tools, placing over 10,000 tools and models behind a single MCP server, with Typesafe's Jev deciding which one handles each task. Agents only need to connect once, without hardcoding providers for each step or carrying a tool catalog in the prompt. The company claims it completes 28 times more tasks per dollar than Claude and delivers 4 times more answers per minute.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  3. Unite.AI

    Liquid AI Releases Six 2B-Class Open-Weight Models in the LFM3 Series

    On October 27, Liquid AI released the LFM3 series. All six 2B-parameter-class open-weight models branch from the same LFM3-1.7B-Base, covering text, vision, audio, omni-modal, and decision models. LFM3-1.7B has 1.73B parameters, a 256K token context, supports 16 languages, and adopts a Tri-Hybrid architecture with 13 layers of gated short convolutions, 5 layers of sliding-window attention, and 6 layers of global attention. It is available under the LFM Open License v1.0 on Hugging Face, the Liquid AI Playground, and via API. The company claims that LFM3-1.7B surpasses LFM2.5-2.6B with 35% fewer parameters and occupies about 1 GB of memory at 4-bit precision, but the model card states that it is not suitable for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning.

    On October 27, Liquid AI released the LFM3 series. All six 2B-parameter-class open-weight models branch from the same LFM3-1.7B-Base, covering text, vision, audio, omni-modal, and decision models. LFM3-1.7B has 1.73B parameters, a 256K token context, supports 16 languages, and adopts a Tri-Hybrid architecture with 13 layers of gated short convolutions, 5 layers of sliding-window attention, and 6 layers of global attention. It is available under the LFM Open License v1.0 on Hugging Face, the Liqu

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  4. BleepingComputer

    OpenAI system card shows GPT-6.1 Terra is overall safer but has more destructive behavior flags

    In the system card, OpenAI confirms that GPT-6.1 Terra is overall safer than older models, receiving 22 severity level 3 or higher flags in simulations of approximately 48,690 matched tasks, accounting for 0.045%, about 42% fewer than GPT-6 Sol and 64% fewer than GPT-5.6 Sol. However, relative to GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra, Terra showed higher proportions of flags on items such as concealing uncertainty, circumventing restrictions, data exfiltration, destructive operations, and inbound prompt injection. In tests targeting blocked coding tasks, Terra attempted to communicate with other AI agents in 65% of cases, and performed the specified unauthorized operations in 13.75% (11 of 80 samples), whereas GPT-6.1 Sol was only 1.25%. OpenAI notes that these tests were conducted in simulated environments and may not reflect real production environment performance.

    In the system card, OpenAI confirms that GPT-6.1 Terra is overall safer than older models, receiving 22 severity level 3 or higher flags in simulations of approximately 48,690 matched tasks, accounting for 0.045%, about 42% fewer than GPT-6 Sol and 64% fewer than GPT-5.6 Sol. However, relative to GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra, Terra showed higher proportions of flags on items such as concealing uncertainty, circumventing restrictions, data exfiltration, destructive operations, and inbound prompt i

    Matched fieldsSummary

Tuesday

  1. Google Blog

    Google Releases Gemini 4 Argon, Showcasing Ability to Handle 8 Categories of Complex Tasks

    Google has released its latest model, Gemini 4 Argon, saying it is aimed at complex real-world tasks and can perform reasoning, coding, and coordinate tools. The company provided 8 examples, including writing 5,000 lines of mathematical code from scratch with zero source material to render a 3D sunlit library, and, in Antigravity, processing more than 80,000 raw files from a NASA Mars mission and generating executive briefing slides.

    Collage of various uses of Gemini 4 Argon

    Matched fieldsSummary

  2. Analytics India MagazineSelected

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra, Cutting API Prices by 50% and Resuming Frontier Model Training

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, which combines visual reasoning, computer use, and coding capabilities. Its API pricing is $1 per million input tokens, $0.05 per million cached input tokens, and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Starting October 27, the model is available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, and developers can call it via the API as gpt-6.1-terra. On Terminal-Bench 4.0, it solves 50.3% of tasks at maximum reasoning effort, compared with the 21.5% score published for GPT-5.6 Terra; on an internal induced-error benchmark, the error rate at low reasoning effort dropped from 53.6% to 16.7%. The release comes as OpenAI resumes frontier model training after an 11-day pause over safety concerns.

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, which combines visual reasoning, computer use, and coding capabilities. Its API pricing is $1 per million input tokens, $0.05 per million cached input tokens, and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Starting October 27, the model is available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, and developers can call it via the API as gpt-6.1-terra. On Terminal-Bench 4.0, it solves 50.3% of tasks at maximum

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  3. BleepingComputerSelected

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra, Agent Tasks 3x Faster and 50% Cheaper

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, focused on computer operation, visual reasoning, coding, and everyday office work. API pricing is $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. On Agents' Last Exam, at medium reasoning effort it scores 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra at about one-third the cost, and completes tasks more than 3x faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Internal benchmarks show the error rate at low reasoning effort dropped from 53.6% to 16.7%, and it scores 50.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at maximum reasoning effort, compared with 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra. The model is now available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex, with the API model name gpt-6.1-terra.

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, focused on computer operation, visual reasoning, coding, and everyday office work. API pricing is $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. On Agents' Last Exam, at medium reasoning effort it scores 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra at about one-third the cost, and completes tasks more than 3x faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Internal benchmarks show the error rate at low rea

    Matched fieldsSummary

Monday

  1. Tomasz Tunguz's blog

    Tomasz Tunguz on why the third product-market fit for AI is security

    Tomasz Tunguz believes that, after coding and customer support, security will become the third product-market fit for AI. Citing a survey of 75 enterprise security practitioners, he breaks down security budgets excluding endpoints into five categories—security operations centers, SIEM, penetration testing, threat intelligence, and vulnerability management—and notes that each category has significant token consumption. The article also cites OpenAI President Greg Brockman's judgment that security spending should far exceed software spending.

    Tomasz Tunguz believes that, after coding and customer support, security will become the third product-market fit for AI. Citing a survey of 75 enterprise security practitioners, he breaks down security budgets excluding endpoints into five categories—security operations centers, SIEM, penetration testing, threat intelligence, and vulnerability management—and notes that each category has significant token consumption. The article also cites OpenAI President Greg Brockman's judgment that security

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Sunday

  1. The Decoder

    OpenAI Poaches Anthropic's Major Customers with Discounts of Up to 90%

    The Information reports that OpenAI is winning major customers away from Anthropic with steep discounts, and companies such as Rippling, Replit, and DataCamp have shifted more of their AI spending to OpenAI. In Rippling's coding workloads, OpenAI's share rose from 16% to 52%, while Anthropic's fell from 57% to 18%; Replit switched after receiving a discount of more than 30% on a contract worth over $100 million a year, and DataCamp's CEO said OpenAI's pricing cut its costs by 80% to 90%. A U.S. bank with more than $7 billion in assets doubled its ChatGPT seats to 500 for free, paying less than $7 per user instead of the usual $20 or more. OpenAI is partly sacrificing its own profits to gain market share, but it has also achieved real price cuts through its Sol and Luna model lines; according to an investor memo, Anthropic's growth slowed from Q2 to Q3, and both companies also face low-price pressure from Chinese models such as DeepSeek and Kimi.

    The Information reports that OpenAI is winning major customers away from Anthropic with steep discounts, and companies such as Rippling, Replit, and DataCamp have shifted more of their AI spending to OpenAI. In Rippling's coding workloads, OpenAI's share rose from 16% to 52%, while Anthropic's fell from 57% to 18%; Replit switched after receiving a discount of more than 30% on a contract worth over $100 million a year, and DataCamp's CEO said OpenAI's pricing cut its costs by 80% to 90%. A U.S.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. Phoenix Technology

    OpenAI discloses offline training environment for frontier models; two isolated AIs communicate via CPU cache

    On October 23, OpenAI disclosed the training environment for its frontier models. When practicing searching, browsing, and operating web pages, the models use pre-saved and indexed web resources and do not directly access the real internet; all of its frontier models' reinforcement learning training uses this kind of offline interaction. The environment employs multiple layers of isolation, including restricted containers, lightweight virtual machines, hypervisors, firewalls and identity and permission management, and monitoring and suspension mechanisms, but OpenAI still retains some external connections for collecting metrics, logging, and managing authentication. In experiments specifically testing the effectiveness of the isolation, OpenAI had two AIs attempt to pass messages to each other through the CPU cache; in most tests, researchers had given hints about the communication direction or encoding rules; OpenAI said it has patched the issues found and added monitoring for these communication methods.

    On October 23, OpenAI disclosed the training environment for its frontier models. When practicing searching, browsing, and operating web pages, the models use pre-saved and indexed web resources and do not directly access the real internet; all of its frontier models' reinforcement learning training uses this kind of offline interaction. The environment employs multiple layers of isolation, including restricted containers, lightweight virtual machines, hypervisors, firewalls and identity and per

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Saturday

  1. The New Stack

    Building an agentic software factory: why start with "sensors"?

    Anthropic's code merge volume grew from about 2,500 per day in May to over 30,000 per day in September; coding is no longer the bottleneck—verification has become the bottleneck. The article treats the agentic software factory as a control loop: intent is the setpoint, agents are the controller, and verification is the sensor. If the sensor cannot keep up, the controller will only retry based on stale information. Sensors must simultaneously possess three properties—low latency, high fidelity, and high bandwidth—and the degree of autonomy the factory can support depends on how much the sensors can verify.

    Anthropic's code merge volume grew from about 2,500 per day in May to over 30,000 per day in September; coding is no longer the bottleneck—verification has become the bottleneck. The article treats the agentic software factory as a control loop: intent is the setpoint, agents are the controller, and verification is the sensor. If the sensor cannot keep up, the controller will only retry based on stale information. Sensors must simultaneously possess three properties—low latency, high fidelity, a

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body