←Search results

By relevance · Total 619 results Clear search

Tuesday

  1. Latent SpaceSelected

    Meta MSL releases Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full models

    Meta Superintelligence Labs releases its second-generation model family Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full; the former is positioned as a fast frontier model, the latter as the full version, and Meta says they target personal and professional agent work. On Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index v4.3, Wonder Full scores 56 and Wonder scores 52, higher than Muse Spark 1.3's 48, while Opus 5.5 leads with 58. Specifications are 1M context, input supports text, images, video and audio, output is text only, and pricing is 4 USD per million tokens for input, 0.20 USD for cached input, and 20 USD for output.

    Meta Superintelligence Labs releases its second-generation model family Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full; the former is positioned as a fast frontier model, the latter as the full version, and Meta says they target personal and professional agent work. On Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index v4.3, Wonder Full scores 56 and Wonder scores 52, higher than Muse Spark 1.3's 48, while Opus 5.5 leads with 58. Specifications are 1M context, input supports text, images, video and audio, output is tex

    Matched fieldsTitle

  2. Huxiu

    Meta releases Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, surpassing Claude on long-horizon coding tests…

    Meta Superintelligence Labs launched its new-generation flagship models Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full on October 13. The Full version scored 56 on the Artificial Analysis Composite Intelligence Index, 2 points behind Claude Opus 5.5's 58. On the DeepSWE 1.1 long-horizon software engineering test, Wonder Full scored 79.0, surpassing Opus 5.5's 74.2 and GPT-6 Astra's 74.1, but it still trails Opus on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and ProgramBench. Artificial Analysis estimates its average task cost at $4.52, up 183% from the previous generation Muse Spark 1.3; a developer comparison on the same prompt shows its 3D game generation is noticeably worse than Opus, and Meta's model card has acknowledged 3D tasks as a known limitation.

    Meta Superintelligence Labs launched its new-generation flagship models Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full on October 13. The Full version scored 56 on the Artificial Analysis Composite Intelligence Index, 2 points behind Claude Opus 5.5's 58. On the DeepSWE 1.1 long-horizon software engineering test, Wonder Full scored 79.0, surpassing Opus 5.5's 74.2 and GPT-6 Astra's 74.1, but it still trails Opus on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and ProgramBench. Artificial Analysis estimates its average task cost at $4.

    Matched fieldsTitle

  3. HuxiuSelected

    Meta releases the Muse Wonder series of models, focused on personal agent memory and long-horizon tasks

    Meta released two models, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, internally codenamed Watermelon, targeting personal and professional agent tasks, with a focus on improving cross-conversation memory and long-duration task execution. Artificial Analysis evaluations show that Wonder Full placed in the top three on six of ten tests, and at the highest reasoning intensity, Muse Code paired with Wonder Full matches Claude Code paired with Sonnet 5.5 in coding performance. API pricing is $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens; Wonder Full is available only to Muse Code subscribers, and Meta AI head Alexandr Wang acknowledged that its coding capability still lags behind Opus 5.5.

    Meta released two models, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, internally codenamed Watermelon, targeting personal and professional agent tasks, with a focus on improving cross-conversation memory and long-duration task execution. Artificial Analysis evaluations show that Wonder Full placed in the top three on six of ten tests, and at the highest reasoning intensity, Muse Code paired with Wonder Full matches Claude Code paired with Sonnet 5.5 in coding performance. API pricing is $4 per million inp

    Matched fieldsTitle

Monday