←News detail

AYi AI NotesUpdated Oct 30 14:32

Musk: AI Will Surpass Humans in All Respects Within a Year or Two, Including Innovation

English text is being prepared.

AI summary

Speaking at a Forbes dinner after losing his lawsuit against OpenAI, Musk said AI will likely surpass humans in every respect within a year or two, and even innovation—humanity's last source of pride—will be flattened. He said he feels both terrified and excited about AI, adding, "I hope it is friendly to us."

Quoted post

AYi

@AYi_AInotes

For the first time, Musk publicly and directly addressed the core substance of the lawsuit against @OpenAI and his love-hate relationship with @sama Altman. In the latest Forbes interview, when Elon talked about the OpenAI lawsuit, he did not dwell on personal grievances but instead flipped over the one card Silicon Valley least dares to lay on the table. Old Musk said: OpenAI's forced conversion from a nonprofit into a fully for-profit entity is setting an extremely dangerous precedent. Many people see this lawsuit as merely a profit struggle among founders, or as sour grapes from Musk over missing out on a hundred-billion-dollar valuation. But the core point Musk made in just over two minutes is actually a Trojan horse that shakes the very foundations of modern commercial philanthropy: If a super-giant, catalyzed by fully tax-exempt, lightly regulated charitable donations and now valued at nearly $800 billion, can casually strip off its public-interest cloak and stuff itself into private pockets, then the existing charitable donation contracts across America and even the world are dead at the root. When OpenAI was founded, the promise that drew everyone in was an extremely noble mission statement: We are a nonprofit; we develop AGI for the benefit of all humanity, to prevent super-technology from being privatized by commercial oligarchs like Google. Musk and other donors put in tens of millions of dollars in genuine, unpaid donations—not for equity dividends, but for the bottom line of the public interest. Later, to raise funds to buy compute, Sam Altman came up with a capped-profit compromise structure. The key compromise clause at the time was written crystal clear: the for-profit entity is only responsible for making money and repaying debt; once true artificial general intelligence (AGI) is achieved, all equity and control must be returned without reservation to the nonprofit charitable organization. And the fact everyone has seen recently is this: That return clause, once used to reassure regulators and donors, was quietly and unilaterally deleted. The reason charitable trusts and tax-exempt funds could exist for hundreds of years is that society reached a consensus: you trade tax exemption for public benefit, and your results forever belong to the public. Now OpenAI has demonstrated a brand-new get-rich-quick pipeline: First, use the nonprofit slogan of saving humanity to feast on tax-exempt benefits, absorb the dedication of top scientists and society's unpaid donations; then, after technological breakthroughs and commercial moats are built, reverse course and amend the charter, compliantly laundering priceless assets that originally belonged to public property into private assets divided among a few executives and Wall Street capital. If this deal ultimately walks away unscathed, there will never again be truly meaningful charitable investment in the world. All tech giants will learn to use the guise of nonprofit status to incubate core assets, leaving R&D risk to taxpayers and donors and the final jackpot to private shareholders. So this has long ceased to be a war between just Musk and Sam Altman; it is more like an ultimate showdown over public trust, the spirit of contract, and the bottom line of Silicon Valley capital's greed.

View original

马斯克第一次公开正面回应了跟@OpenAI 诉讼案的核心实质以及跟@sama Altman的爱恨情仇, 在福布斯最新访谈里Elon聊到 OpenAI 诉讼案时,没有纠结个人恩怨,而是把整个硅谷最不敢摊开讲的一张底牌直接掀开了, 老马说:OpenAI 从非营利强行转为全面营利,正在开创一个极其危险的先例。 很多人看这场官司,以为只是创始人之间的利益撕扯,或者是马斯克因为错过千亿估值而产生的酸葡萄心理。 但马斯克在 2 分多钟里点破的核心,其实是一场动摇整个现代商业慈善根基的特洛伊木马: 如果一家由全免税、免监管的慈善捐赠催化出来、今天估值逼近 8000 亿美元的超级巨头,可以把公益外衣随手脱掉直接装进私人腰包,那么全美甚至全球现有的慈善捐赠契约,就全部从根子上死掉了。 当年 OpenAI 成立时拉着所有人入局的承诺,是一份极度崇高的使命书: 我们是非营利组织,我们为了全人类的利益研发 AGI,防止超级技术被谷歌等商业寡头私有化。 马斯克和其他捐赠人真金白银掏了几千万美元的无偿捐赠,图的不是股权分红,而是公共利益的底线。 后来为了融资买算力,Sam Altman 搞出了一个上限利润的折中结构。 当时各方妥协的关键条款写得清清楚楚:营利实体只负责赚钱还债,一旦真正的通用人工智能(AGI)实现,所有的股权和控制权必须毫无保留地退还给非营利慈善机构。 而最近所有人看到的事实是: 这个曾经用来安抚监管、安抚捐赠人的归还条款,被他们悄无声息地单方面删掉了。 以前慈善信托和免税基金之所以能存在上百年,是因为社会达成了共识:你用免税换取公益,你的成果就永远属于公众。 现在 OpenAI 示范了一条全新的暴富流水线: 先用拯救人类的非营利口号吃尽免税红利、吸纳顶级科学家的奉献和社会的无偿捐款, 等技术突破、商业壁垒铸成之后,反手修改章程,把原本属于公共财产的无价资产,合规洗成几个管理层和华尔街资本瓜分的私产。 如果这一单最终能全身而退,以后世界上就再也没有真正意义上的慈善投资了。 所有的科技巨头都会学着用非营利的幌子孵化核心资产,把研发风险留给纳税人和捐助者,把终局红利留给私人股东, 所以,这早就不是马斯克和 Sam Altman 两个人的战争了, 更像是一场关于公众信任、契约精神与硅谷资本贪婪底线的终极对决。

View original post

Body

白天刚在法庭上输掉与 OpenAI 的百亿对决,当晚马斯克坐在福布斯晚宴上,状态失神的让人心疼,但他却说出了全场最让人脊背发凉的一句话: AI 在全方位超越人类,大概只剩一两年,连创新这种人类最后的自尊,马上也要被彻底端平了。

马斯克这个大帅比真的牛逼,在输掉了一场关乎全球最大 AI 资产控制权的官司之后,他没有把时间浪费在抱怨法官或对手身上,而是用一种罕见的失神状态讲出了这番话:

“我对 AI 既惊恐又兴奋,AI 在各方面超越人类,大概不出一两年。”

很多人看热闹,总以为这只是一次商业巨头败诉后的公关失态,或者又一次习惯性的技术恐吓。

但如果我们把败诉这个残酷的现实切口拼上去,就会发现这其实是一个顶级操盘手在亲手被踢下棋盘后,吐出的一句绝望真话: 当创造者自己都被商业机制和法律条文剥夺了对 AI 舵盘的掌控权时,连世界首富也不得不面对现实—— 人类这个物种,正在以天为单位,快速滑向丧失全面主导权的边缘。

在过去的认知里,人类总喜欢把最后一张自尊的底牌压在“创新”和“灵性”上。

大家觉得算力再强也只能模仿套路,机器只能消化人类喂给它的旧数据,真正的逻辑跃迁、底层发明和灵光一闪,永远属于肉身大脑。

但在专访里,马斯克彻底敲碎了这个自欺欺人的遮羞布: AI 在全方位碾压人类,不仅包含算力、记忆和体力,更包含了人类最引以为傲的“无中生有”的发明与创新能力。

每天都在爆发的算法突破,连站在全球算力最前沿的人都感到头晕目眩。 当创新本身被转化成一种以光速自我演进的高维算法时,肉身科学家的迭代速度,在它面前慢得就像地质纪元里的冰川。

更刺骨的是,面对这种全方位的智力降维打击,马斯克最终收敛成了一句近乎无力的祈祷: “我希望它对我们友好。” 以前的商业战争,输了可以重组资本、招募团队,在下一个周期杀回来。

但 AI 时代的游戏规则完全变了: 一旦智能的代际差距拉大到无法逾越的断层,人类之间为了权力和控制权而打的每一场官司,在未来那个冷酷的超级智能眼里,都轻得像一群蚂蚁为了面包屑打架。

所以我们别再争论谁在这场官司里赢了名誉和金钱, 当裁判哨声吹响的时候,场上的两位棋手可能都还没意识到: 那个在棋盘深处不断被喂大的造物,已经快要站起身来,把整张桌子掀掉了。

Source

AYi AI Notes