Understand this story
On November 3, 2026, Lu Chuanying, a special expert at the Center for Strategic and Security Studies of Tsinghua University, published the article "The Diffusion of Issues in Global Artificial Intelligence Governance, the Institutional Framework, and China's Role." The article points out that global AI governance issues are extending from behavioral norms toward both the technological and industrial ends; as of October 2026, the OECD Policy Navigator had catalogued 2,568 policy initiatives, yet governance fragmentation is intensifying. Lu Chuanying analyzes that the diffusion of issues is jointly driven by the dilemma of consensus on behavioral norms, the endogenous nature of technological risks, and the strategization of the conditions for forming technological capabilities; the current framework consists of existing multilateral mechanisms such as the United Nations, G20, and APEC, specialized mechanisms such as the Bletchley Summit, and comprehensive mechanisms such as "Silicon Peace." The Chinese approach is supported by equal emphasis on development and security, coordination among multilateral institutions, and capacity building in the Global South.
AI-generated from public reports
Latest development · Report
Lu Chuanying: The Diffusion of Global AI Governance Issues, the Institutional Framework, and China's RoleDevelopments
1 confirmed developments
- Source:English text is being prepared.
Reports and discussion timeline
Browse reports and discussion by time. Their evidence levels remain distinct.
Nov 3
Center for Strategic and Security Studies at Tsinghua UniversityFirst-party
Lu Chuanying: The Diffusion of Global AI Governance Issues, the Institutional Framework, and China's Role
Lu Chuanying, a distinguished expert at the Center for Strategic and Security Studies at Tsinghua University, pointed out that global AI governance issues are extending from behavioral norms toward both the technology and industry ends; as of October 2026, the OECD Policy Navigator had catalogued 2,568 policy initiatives, yet governance fragmentation is intensifying. He analyzed that the diffusion of issues is jointly driven by the consensus dilemma over behavioral norms, the endogenous nature of technological risks, and the strategization of the conditions for forming technological capabilities. The current framework consists of existing multilateral mechanisms such as the United Nations, G20, and APEC, specialized mechanisms such as the Bletchley Summit, and comprehensive mechanisms such as "Silicon Peace." China's approach is supported by placing equal emphasis on development and security, multilateral institutional coordination, and capacity building in the Global South.