Ethan Mollick:给 AI 做一场面试,而不是只看基准分数
Ethan Mollick 认为,公开基准存在题目泄漏、含义不明和未校准等问题,无法衡量写作、共情或商业判断等能力,因此个人可以用"氛围测试"感受模型差异,企业则应像招聘一样对 AI 做严格面试。他以 GuacaDrone 无人机送鳄梨酱的点子让多个模型各打分十次,发现模型内部评分相当一致,但模型之间差异明显,Grok 和 Microsoft Copilot 更看好,GPT-5 和 Claude 4.5 更怀疑,这种 3 到 4 分的系统性偏差在规模化使用时会持续影响决策方向。他建议企业用真实业务场景反复测试、由专家评估并横向比较模型,而且每年需多次重做。
for many tests, the actual top score may be unachievable because there are many errors in the test questions and measures are often reported in unusual ways. Every benchmark has flaws, but they are all trending the same way - up and to the right. The AIME is a hard math exam, GPQA tests scientific and legal knowledge, the MMLU is a general knowledge test, SWE-bench and LiveBench test coding, Terminal-Bench tests agentic ability. Data from Epoch AI . Despite these issues, all of these benchmarks,
匹配字段正文
