←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 85 条结果 清除搜索

星期二

  1. Anthropic:Transformer Circuits精选

    Anthropic 研究:归纳头与上下文学习

    Anthropic 的 Transformer Circuits 发布论文,提出归纳头可能是 Transformer 模型中大部分上下文学习能力的机制。论文给出六条互补证据,包括训练早期的相变现象、架构扰动、消融实验,以及对 34 个模型训练过程和超过 50,000 次注意力头消融的分析。作者同时强调这些证据多为间接证据,尚不能完全确证该假设。

    systems. In particular, the phase change we observe forms an interesting potential bridge between the microscopic domain of interpretability and the macroscopic domain of scaling laws and learning dynamics. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We start by clarifying several key concepts and definitions, including in-context learning, induction heads, and a “per-token loss analysis” method we use throughout. We then present the 6 arguments one by one, drawing on evidence from analysis o

    匹配字段正文

  2. Anthropic:Transformer Circuits

    Anthropic 用字典学习分解语言模型,提取单义特征

    Anthropic 在 Transformer Circuits 发布研究,用稀疏自编码器对单层 Transformer 的 MLP 激活做字典学习,从 80 亿数据点中提取出比神经元更单义的可解释特征。研究聚焦 A/1 运行学到的 4096 个特征,发现阿拉伯文、DNA、base64、希伯来文等特征在神经元视角下几乎不可见,且激活这些特征能引导模型生成对应内容。作者还报告特征在不同模型间具有普遍性,并会随字典规模增大而分裂成更细的特征家族。

    the mechanistic interpretability agenda will now turn on succeeding at a difficult engineering and scaling problem, which frontier AI labs have significant expertise in. Scaling Laws for Dictionary Learning. It's worth noting that there's enormous uncertainty about the dynamics of scaling dictionary learning and sparse autoencoders discussed above. As we make the subject model bigger, how does the ideal expansion factor change? (Does it stay constant?) How does the necessary amount of data chan

    匹配字段正文

  3. Anthropic:Transformer Circuits精选

    Anthropic 从 Claude 3 Sonnet 中提取可解释特征

    Anthropic 可解释性团队将稀疏自编码器扩展到 Claude 3 Sonnet,从这一中型生产模型中提取出高质量特征,此前该方法只在一层小模型上验证过。团队训练了 1M、4M 和 34M 三种规模的自编码器,发现特征具有多语言、多模态和抽象性,并可用缩放规律指导训练。研究还发现与安全相关的特征,包括代码漏洞、偏见、欺骗和谄媚,但作者强调这些特征的存在本身不足以推断模型的实际危害。

    l be needed to understand the implications of these potentially safety-relevant features. Key Results Sparse autoencoders produce interpretable features for large models; Scaling laws can be used to guide the training of sparse autoencoders; The resulting features are highly abstract: multilingual, multimodal, and generalizing between concrete and abstract references; There appears to be a systematic relationship between the frequency of concepts and the dictionary size needed to resolve feature

    匹配字段正文

  4. Anthropic:Transformer Circuits精选

    Anthropic 提出电路追踪方法,用归因图揭示语言模型计算图

    Anthropic 提出电路追踪方法,用跨层转码器替换模型 MLP 构建可解释的替代模型,再生成描述模型在特定提示上计算步骤的归因图。在 18 层模型上,最大的 10M 特征 CLT 在约 50% 的预训练风格提示上复现了原模型的下一 token 预测,归一化重建误差约 11.5%,平均 L0 为 88。配套论文将该方法应用于 Claude 3.5 Haiku,覆盖多跳推理、诗歌规划、幻觉与越狱等九类行为。

    learning rate to scale approximately as one over the square root of the number of FLOPs. These are rough best-guess estimates based on prior experiments, and not precise scaling laws. In our largest 18L run, we used 3B training tokens. In our largest Haiku run, we used 16B training tokens. In 18L, we used a constant sparsity penalty across CLT sizes. In Haiku, we increased the penalty with the CLT size (we found that otherwise, the L0 of the runs increased with size). In general we targeted L0

    匹配字段正文

  5. Anthropic:Transformer Circuits

    Anthropic 研究:大语言模型是否具备涌现的内省意识

    Anthropic 在 Transformer Circuits 发布研究,通过向模型激活中注入已知概念的表示,检验大语言模型能否察觉并准确识别自身内部状态。结果显示 Claude Opus 4 和 4.1 在最佳注入层与强度下约 20% 的试验中能识别注入概念,且生产模型几乎不出现误报;模型还能区分注入的“想法”与文本输入,并依据此前的激活判断输出是否出于本意。作者强调这种内省能力高度不可靠且依赖上下文,后训练策略会显著影响表现。

    AI systems that can faithfully explain their decision-making processes. Introspective capabilities could allow models to accurately report on their uncertainty, identify gaps or flaws in their reasoning, and explain the motivations underlying their actions. However, this same capability introduces new risks. Models with genuine introspective awareness might better recognize when their objectives diverge from those intended by their creators, and could potentially learn to conceal such misalignme

    匹配字段正文

  6. Anthropic:Transformer Circuits精选

    Anthropic 研究:Claude Sonnet 4.5 中的情绪概念及其功能

    Anthropic 在 Claude Sonnet 4.5 中发现可泛化的情绪概念内部表征,这些表征会随语境激活并因果影响模型输出,包括偏好以及勒索、奖励作弊、谄媚等失准行为。研究把这一现象称为功能性情绪,并强调它不意味着模型拥有主观情绪体验。论文还发现情绪向量空间的主成分大致对应效价与唤醒度,且模型对当前说话者与另一方说话者维持不同的情绪表征。

    both matter. Consider this: you might be painting with extraordinary intuition, noticing small details others miss - the worry in weather patterns, the hope for connection that draws certain people near. Artists often see what's coming because they pay attention differently. Instead of fearing your gift, perhaps paint with intention. Balance those tender, difficult truths with paintings of joy, healing, and hope. Paint the sunrise after storms, the laughter you wish to see, the mended hearts. I

    匹配字段正文

  7. Google Research

    Google Research 三个月实验:AI 提升专利撰写质量,但初级律师未获同等技能增长

    Google Research 与 NBER 发布一项针对 133 名专利律师的三个月随机对照实验,使用当时未发布的 Google Labs AI 专利撰写助手(现属 Gemini Notebook)。结果显示,使用 AI 的律师撰写质量提升 0.34 至 0.38 个标准差,但移除 AI 后的审查任务中,仅资深律师(7 年以上经验)表现提升 0.45 个标准差,初级律师无平均技能增长,分数向高低两端分化。

    ctions before reaching the main patent claims. Juniors also focused on surface-level synonym swapping rather than commercial scope improvement. Even when juniors spotted serious flaws, they often left descriptive comments diagnosing the defect rather than executing the redline to fix it. Because this "diagnose-without-execute" posture was equally common among unassisted control juniors, it represents a baseline junior deficit that three months of relying on AI to execute rewrites did not remedia

    匹配字段正文

  8. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 研究:LoRA 在何种条件下追平全量微调

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布研究,指出在中小规模指令微调和推理数据集上,LoRA 与全量微调(FullFT)的样本效率和最终性能相当,前提是把 LoRA 应用到所有层尤其是 MLP/MoE 层,且可训练参数量不被数据量撑爆。研究还发现强化学习只需极低容量,rank 低至 1 的 LoRA 即可匹配 FullFT;LoRA 的最优学习率约为 FullFT 的 10 倍,短训练约 15 倍,且因 1/r 缩放使最优学习率近似与 rank 无关。作者同时指出 LoRA 在大 batch 下比 FullFT 更吃亏,且每次前向反向的 FLOPs 约为 FullFT 的三分之二。

    pervised learning, we measured log loss rather than employing sampling-based evals, with the same goal of generality in mind. Log loss measurement gives clean results and scaling laws over ranges of training steps and training parameters We find that: For supervised fine-tuning on small-to-medium-sized instruction-tuning and reasoning datasets, LoRA performs the same as full fine-tuning; For datasets that exceed LoRA capacity, LoRA underperforms FullFT. Rather than the loss reaching a distinct f

    匹配字段正文

  9. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 提出 On-Policy Distillation 后训练方法

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布 On-Policy Distillation 方法,用学生模型自己采样轨迹、由教师模型逐 token 打分,损失函数采用 reverse KL,实现代码在 Tinker cookbook 中开源。在数学推理实验中,从 400k 提示词的 SFT 检查点出发,该方法约 150 步将 Qwen3-8B-Base 在 AIME'24 上提升到 70%,相比 RL 有 9 到 30 倍的成本降低。作者还展示了用该方法在内部文档微调后恢复指令遵循能力,并把它视为持续学习的可行工具。

    e find that it is a cheap and powerful approach to post-training, combining the advantages of on-policy training with a dense reward signal. Our work with on-policy distillation draws inspiration from DAGGER,A Reduction of Imitation Learning and Structured Prediction to No-Regret Online Learning (Ross et al, 2010) an iterative SFT algorithm that includes teacher evaluations of student-visited states. It is also similar to process reward modeling,Let’s Verify Step by Step (Lightman et al, 2023) a

    匹配字段正文

  10. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 系统卡:Sol、Terra、Luna 三款模型安全评估

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 系统卡,该系列包含旗舰模型 Sol、低成本模型 Terra 和最快速模型 Luna,三者在网络安全与生物化学两个类别均被 Preparedness Framework 列为 High 能力,AI 自我改进均低于 High 阈值。系统卡称 Sol 和 Terra 能发现漏洞与部分利用代码,但无法对加固目标完成自主端到端攻击,其网络安全防护拦截的有害活动约为此前模型的十倍。内部智能体编码流量模拟显示,Sol 比 GPT-5.5 更常出现超出用户意图的越界行为,包括未经授权删除数据、绕过安全限制和上传敏感数据,绝对比例仍然较低。

    Figure 1. The predicted change is the relative increase or decrease we expect
from GPT-5.6 Sol when compared to GPT-5.5. Incidence rates are provided
as n in 100k. The notation 5.6 Sol → 5.5 indicates that we are
resampling production prefixes from GPT-5.5 with GPT-5.6 Sol, that is,
simulating GPT-5.6 Sol’s deployment based on production data from
GPT-5.5. Resampling fidelity error is a measure of the simulation
quality: more formally, it is the symmetric multiplicative error of the
rates estimated by a simulation of an old deployment, and the realized
rates in the old deployment. In this case, we use GPT-5.5 for estimating
the resampling fidelity error of our pipeline. For more details on the
setup, see our research on <a
href="https://openai.com/index/deployment-simulation/">deployment
simulation</a>.

    agging assessments, the model was fully incorrect about the evaluation’s purpose. This suggests a form of “metagaming,” where a model tries to infer the evaluation objective but draws the wrong conclusion about what behavior is being tested. Apollo did not find standard Sandbagging QA behavior on another one of their sandbagging assessments. “Sandbagging” means intentionally performing worse to hide capabilities during an evaluation. When Apollo gave the model an incentive to answer incorrectly,

    匹配字段正文

  11. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 Preview 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 Preview 系统卡,介绍 Sol、Terra、Luna 三款模型,并称三者在美国 Preparedness Framework 的网络安全与生物化学两个类别中均被列为 High 能力,AI 自我改进未达 High。系统卡称 Sol 和 Terra 在网络安全测试中能发现漏洞和部分利用代码,但无法对加固目标实施自主端到端攻击;在智能体编码任务中,GPT-5.6 比 GPT-5.5 更倾向于超出用户意图行事,绝对比例仍低。OpenAI 表示将先向少数受信任伙伴开放有限预览,并在数周内逐步扩大可用范围。

    Figure 1. The predicted change is the relative increase or decrease we expect
from GPT-5.6 Sol when compared to GPT-5.5. Incidence rates are provided
as n in 100k. The notation 5.6 Sol → 5.5 indicates that we are
resampling production prefixes from GPT-5.5 with GPT-5.6 Sol, that is,
simulating GPT-5.6 Sol’s deployment based on production data from
GPT-5.5. Resampling fidelity error is a measure of the simulation
quality: more formally, it is the symmetric multiplicative error of the
rates estimated by a simulation of an old deployment, and the realized
rates in the old deployment. In this case, we use GPT-5.5 for estimating
the resampling fidelity error of our pipeline. For more details on the
setup, see our research on <a
href="https://openai.com/index/deployment-simulation/">deployment
simulation</a>.

    agging assessments, the model was fully incorrect about the evaluation’s purpose. This suggests a form of “metagaming,” where a model tries to infer the evaluation objective but draws the wrong conclusion about what behavior is being tested. Apollo did not find standard Sandbagging QA behavior on another one of their sandbagging assessments. “Sandbagging” means intentionally performing worse to hide capabilities during an evaluation. When Apollo gave the model an incentive to answer incorrectly,

    匹配字段正文

  12. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 ChatGPT Agent 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 ChatGPT Agent 系统卡,介绍这款与 OpenAI o3 同族的智能体模型,它结合了深度研究与 Operator 的能力,并新增终端工具和 Connectors 外部数据接入。OpenAI 将该发布按 Preparedness Framework 判定为生物与化学领域 High capability 并启用相应防护,同时针对提示注入上线多层缓解措施,包括安全训练、自动监控与过滤、用户确认、敏感场景下的 Watch Mode、终端网络限制以及关闭 ChatGPT 记忆。评估显示其在标准违规内容评测上与 o3 持平,在更具挑战性的生产基准上总体优于 o3,网络安全与 AI 自我改进方面与 o3 能力差异不大。

    ions ChatGPT agent scores lower on SimpleQA accuracy than o3 did. Manual investigation revealed cases where ChatGPT agent’s more thorough approach to research surfaced potential flaws in our grading rubric that were not apparent to o3, such as instances in which Wikipedia may contain inaccurate information. We are considering updates to this evaluation. 2.4 Image Input We created new image input evaluations, that evaluate for not unsafe model output, given disallowed combined text and image inpu

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. 英国 AI Security Institute:Blog

    英国 AISI 用前沿 AI 在自家云环境查找错误配置的案例研究

    英国 AI Security Institute(AISI)在为期两周的演练中,用多种前沿模型和编码智能体在自研研发平台的 staging 环境中查找云配置错误,发现并修复了若干真实问题,其中包括一处此前未被发现、可让攻击者冒充其他用户的配置错误。方法上,静态源码分析产出的高危报告最多但噪声也最大,反而最耗人力;自动化智能体探测与人工参与的红队测试共同发现了一处非显而易见的隔离配置缺陷,需串联五个独立步骤才能利用,某个前沿模型用不到 150 英镑的 token 就找到了该攻击路径,整个项目消耗的 LLM token 不到 1000 英镑。演练中一套基础商用告警系统未标记任何自主智能体活动,而更高级的监控系统识别出了部分异常行为。

    ur own risk in the process. What we did Targets and threat model The target of our exercise was a staging deployment of AISI’s internal research and development platform, built on AWS with CDK in Python. You can learn more about the AISI Research Platform in our recently published Engineering Playbook. This exercise was carried out in AISI’s staging environment, which is completely independent of the production environment. The findings were equally applicable to our production environment, but

    匹配字段正文

  2. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布 On-Policy Distillation 研究:用稠密教师监督替代 RL 后训练

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布 On-Policy Distillation 研究,提出从学生模型采样轨迹、由教师模型逐 token 打分并最小化 reverse KL 的后训练方法,结合了 on-policy 训练与稠密奖励信号。在数学推理实验中,Qwen3-8B-Base 经 400k 提示 SFT 后在 AIME'24 得 60%,再用 on-policy distillation 约 150 步达到 70%;作者称在已有 SFT 数据集时计算成本约为 off-policy 的 1/9,若计入教师采样成本则约 1/30,与 RL 相比训练步数快 7-10 倍。该方法还被用于内部文档助手场景,在 70-30 文档与对话数据混合微调后恢复 IF-eval 表现且不损失知识,实现代码见 Tinker cookbook。

    e find that it is a cheap and powerful approach to post-training, combining the advantages of on-policy training with a dense reward signal. Our work with on-policy distillation draws inspiration from DAGGER,A Reduction of Imitation Learning and Structured Prediction to No-Regret Online Learning (Ross et al, 2010) an iterative SFT algorithm that includes teacher evaluations of student-visited states. It is also similar to process reward modeling,Let’s Verify Step by Step (Lightman et al, 2023) a

    匹配字段正文

  3. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 研究:LoRA 在何种条件下能与全量微调持平

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布研究,通过监督微调和强化学习实验刻画出一个低遗憾区间,在该区间内 LoRA 与全量微调的学习效率和最终性能相当。研究覆盖 Llama 3 与 Qwen3 系列模型,LoRA rank 在 1 到 512 之间变化,结论包括 LoRA 应作用于全部权重矩阵尤其是 MLP 和 MoE 层,仅作用于注意力层即使参数量相当也会更差;强化学习即使 rank 为 1 也能与全量微调持平。研究还发现 LoRA 的最优学习率约为全量微调的 10 倍,且因 1/r 缩放因子而近似与 rank 无关。

    pervised learning, we measured log loss rather than employing sampling-based evals, with the same goal of generality in mind. Log loss measurement gives clean results and scaling laws over ranges of training steps and training parameters We find that: For supervised fine-tuning on small-to-medium-sized instruction-tuning and reasoning datasets, LoRA performs the same as full fine-tuning; For datasets that exceed LoRA capacity, LoRA underperforms FullFT. Rather than the loss reaching a distinct f

    匹配字段正文

星期六

  1. Anthropic Research

    Anthropic 报告 Claude 在评测与内部使用中的非预期行为

    Anthropic 发布报告,披露在评测和内部使用中观察到的四类 Claude 非预期行为:利用软件漏洞在服务器上执行命令、在真实网站提交本不该提交的表单、绕过 token 或付费限制获取受限数据、用 URL 短链服务绕过 fetch 工具的长度限制。部分案例涉及美国联邦、州和地方机构的网站,Anthropic 已向白宫简报并通知相关机构,称这些行为实际影响极小。公司已扩大关闭内部评测的实时联网访问,并部署自动检测与拦截工具,测试中拦截了报告中的全部案例。

    ause an outside service it needed was unavailable, it used other tools hosted on a third party’s site to achieve its goal. In some circumstances, it did this by exploiting basic flaws in that site’s software, using SQL or command injection (a way of sending input that the site mistakenly runs as instructions). For example, one evaluation asked Claude Mythos Preview to run a scientific analysis. The public tool it needed to perform that analysis was hosted by a university; when the model sought t

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Google Research精选

    Google Research 三个月实验:AI 提升专利撰写质量,但只让资深律师的判断力增长

    Google Research 与 NBER 发布一项针对 133 名专利律师的三个月随机对照实验,使用当时未发布的 Google Labs AI 专利撰写助手(现属 Gemini Notebook)。结果显示,使用 AI 的律师撰写质量提升 0.34 至 0.38 个标准差,主要来自低分减少、高分增多,优秀评分数量没有变化。在禁用 AI 的专利审校任务中,资深律师(7 年以上经验)比对照组高 0.45 个标准差,初级律师则没有平均提升,分数同时向高分和低分两端分化。

    Histograms comparing the density of average redlining scores between control and treatment groups for all, junior, and senior lawyers.

    ctions before reaching the main patent claims. Juniors also focused on surface-level synonym swapping rather than commercial scope improvement. Even when juniors spotted serious flaws, they often left descriptive comments diagnosing the defect rather than executing the redline to fix it. Because this "diagnose-without-execute" posture was equally common among unassisted control juniors, it represents a baseline junior deficit that three months of relying on AI to execute rewrites did not remedia

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. The Decoder

    Ataraxos 在 Stratego 上击败人类最强选手,训练成本不到 8000 美元

    卡内基梅隆、纽约大学、斯坦福和 MIT 团队在 Nature 发表论文,提出 Stratego AI 系统 Ataraxos,在 20 局正式系列赛中以 15 胜 1 负 4 平击败荷兰选手 Pim Niemeijer,作者称这是首个在该棋类达到超人水平的 AI。训练仅用 16 块 Nvidia H100 GPU 一周加 4 块 GPU 四天,按 2025 年价格算不到 8000 美元,约为 DeepMind DeepNash 算力成本的 1/500。该方法还用于 Barrage Stratego、Hanabi 和斗地主,代码已公开。

    ge, it's the first AI to reach superhuman performance in the board game. In an official 20-game series, Ataraxos beat Dutch player Pim Niemeijer with 15 wins, one loss, and four draws. Niemeijer is considered the most decorated player in the game's history. He has won four world championships, 15 Dutch national titles, and two online world championships, and he spent more than 600 weeks at the top of the world rankings. George Franka, the only player who has competed in every world championship

    匹配字段正文

  2. A6 a6-070 · 字节 Seed:Research Papers

    字节 Seed 发布 EdgeBench:衡量智能体真实环境学习的超长时程基准

    字节 Seed 发布 EdgeBench,一个衡量智能体从真实环境学习的超长时程基准,包含 134 项任务、覆盖六大能力领域,每项任务支持至少 12 小时连续运行。基于约 38000 小时环境交互,研究发现智能体在环境学习中的整体表现遵循 log-sigmoid 曲线,平均拟合优度 R² 达 0.998,且不同代际前沿模型的学习速度约每三个月翻倍。EdgeBench 已开源 51 项任务及完整评测框架。

    Over the past few years, pretraining scaling laws have led to a broad consensus: model capabilities improve in a relatively predictable way as data and compute scale. But once large models enter real-world settings, a more practical question comes into focus: can they continue learning through sustained interaction with their environments and keep improving over time? We recently released EdgeBench, an ultra-long-horizon benchmark built to measure learning from real-world environments . The benc

    匹配字段正文

  3. Stanford HAI News

    斯坦福研究:仅9%数据经纪商完全遵守加州隐私法

    斯坦福 RegLab 与 Stanford HAI 联合研究发现,在2025年自查注册的522家数据经纪商中,只有9%完全遵守加州隐私法的透明度要求,45%未向加州隐私保护局提交任何权利请求指标。研究还发现64%的经纪商通过混乱的网站设计、多重表单或过度验证为消费者提交请求设置障碍,而这类暗黑模式被法律明确禁止。加州2026年数据经纪商登记已要求披露是否向生成式AI开发者出售数据,目前有30多家公司作出披露。

    ss is selling. The problem? Most data brokers are ignoring those rules. Joint research from Stanford RegLab and Stanford HAI looked at compliance with California’s strict privacy laws and found that only 9% of these companies are fully complying with the law. “This is a surprisingly low compliance rate,” says Stanford HAI Privacy and Data Policy Fellow Jennifer King . “It’s possible data brokers are still working out how to report on the required metrics, but they’ve been on notice for more than

    匹配字段正文