←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 174 条结果 清除搜索

星期五

  1. Meta Engineering Blog精选

    Meta 如何用 AI 智能体工程方式构建 Forum 应用

    Meta 工程团队分享了用智能体 AI 构建独立 Groups 应用 Forum 的实践,把 AI 智能体当作工程流程的参与者而非打字加速器,并以通过构建、测试和评审的已验证产出而非代码量衡量成功。团队把自动化验证信号接入智能体循环,用导航智能体模拟真人操作做回归测试,并采用与生产共享代码库但把原型代码完全编译出生产构建的沙箱构建方式。Forum 在八周内达到与 Facebook Groups 的核心功能对齐,自主压力测试在开发阶段发现并修复了一处内存问题,使内存占用和页面错误约减半。

    ature parity with Facebook Groups in eight weeks, with AI handling much of the routine implementation so engineers could focus on architecture, product decisions, and quality. Leverage that lasted: After launch, agent-driven investigation helped engineers triage and root-cause user feedback. The AI did more than generate code. It tightened our quality loop, helping a small team deliver a high-quality app with less ongoing rework. Acknowledgements We thank Neeharika Sinha, Jane Kou, Gang Yang, Gu

    匹配字段正文

  2. Apple Machine Learning Research精选

    Apple 用 MLX 与 RDMA 在 Mac Studio 上本地及分布式推理大模型

    Apple 介绍如何用最新版 MLX 在 Mac Studio 上运行大语言模型,并借助 macOS 26.2 的 RDMA over Thunderbolt 5 驱动和 MLX v0.30.1 起的 jaccl 通信集合实现多机分布式推理。在四台 M5 Ultra Mac Studio 上,816B 参数的 Muse Spark Open 以 NVFP4 精度生成超过 36 tokens/s;单机上 M5 Ultra 相比 M3 Ultra 的 TTFT 最高快 4.6 倍,生成速度提升 1.6 倍。文中还给出 mlx_lm.benchmark、mlx.launch 和 mlx_lm.server 的命令示例,并说明可用 OpenCode 等工具接入本地 LLM 服务。

    The MLX logo

    LX on Mac with Apple silicon lets AI researchers and developers experiment locally with the latest models and methods in a private environment. The open-source array framework leverages the unified memory architecture of Apple silicon, enabling anyone to run new inference and fine-tuning methods on their own hardware and explore other AI techniques. In a previous post, we highlighted the advantages of the M5 architecture and its GPU Neural Accelerators. In this post, we show how to run the lates

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Google Developers Blog

    Google 团队详解如何评测 AI 智能体:从 Day 0 到 Day 2 的落地流程

    Google Developers Blog 发布一篇智能体评测实践指南,提出用关键用户旅程定义成功标准、以模拟用户生成执行轨迹,并按 Day 0 到 Day 2 逐步搭建评测流水线。文章指出仅靠终端里跑几条提示词的 vibe check 无法发现重试循环、工具参数幻觉和 token 浪费等隐性失败,建议把 LLM-as-a-judge 的 1 到 5 分打分改为布尔式通过/失败检查,并同时跟踪延迟、token 消耗、API 成本和工具调用次数。文中还列出四个常见陷阱,包括随意增删测试导致基线失效、只评文本忽略运行成本、以及为不同编排框架重写评测流程,并推荐使用开源 agent-eval 工具包配合 OpenInference 与 Gemini 平台的 Agent Evaluation 服务。

    evaluating-ai-agents-banner-1600x900

    eviously passing metric regresses. This prevents developers from accidentally trading a critical capability for a minor edge-case improvement. Shared dashboards and centralized storage: Configure your eval processes to export run artifacts—including raw trace JSONL, prompt hashes, model versions, latency profiles, and scorecard summaries—into a central data warehouse like BigQuery or Cloud Storage. Publishing these metrics to a shared team dashboard gives everyone visibility into accuracy, laten

    匹配字段正文

  2. Anthropic:Claude.dev 开发者博客

    Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查

    Anthropic 的 Claude Code 团队公开了其代码审查流程:把大部分阅读交给机器,人工只处理高风险决策。团队称 6 月到 9 月合并的 PR 数量翻倍以上,回滚比例下降超过 40%;内部 PR 获得实质审查意见的比例从 16% 升到 54%。流程分六层,包括提交前用测试和子智能体验证、每个 PR 的 Claude 审查、可阻断的安全审查、自动化检查、按风险分级的人工批准,以及合并队列和快速回滚。

    Diagram titled "If machines do most of the reading, how does anyone learn the code?" On the left, a grid stands for the codebase, with a few squares highlighted as managed settings, the part you want to understand; nobody keeps a complete mental model of it in their head. An arrow labeled "Ask Claude about exactly that slice", with the example question "How does Claude Code retrieve managed settings?", leads to two outcomes: Claude writes an explainer, which takes minutes and reflects the code as it is today; and, for some, Claude builds a small artifact that visualizes that part of the code and teaches it the way that person likes to learn. Along the bottom: reading trivial diffs line by line, a one-line copy change teaches you almost nothing; an explainer for the module you are about to change teaches you a lot.

    EngineeringHow the Claude Code team does code review How do you review code at the volume agents produce it? On the Claude Code team, once we had high coverage and deep reviews, we started optimizing for the minimum amount of human review time that doesn't raise reverts or incidents.AUTHORAddy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing WangPUBLISHEDOct 15, 2026READING TIME14 min We've said before that Claude writes about 90 percent of Claude Code's own code. So how do we review code at the volume we

    匹配字段正文

  3. The Guardian Technology

    AI 会如何改变生物武器开发的风险与门槛

    英国军情五处负责人 Ken McCallum 警告 AI 可能“改变”现有乃至新型生物武器的风险格局。文章梳理了两类风险:无技术基础的恐怖组织可借 AI 聊天机器人补齐知识与实验排错,资源充足的国家行为体则可用 AI 放大已有专业能力,例如识别让病原体更致命的基因改动。专家同时指出,隐性知识、生物材料与设备获取、实验验证、规模化与投放仍是实质障碍,目前各国尚无针对此类滥用的正式政府政策。

    dles that remain. How could AI help people make bioweapons? It depends on who wants to make them. One risk is the rogue, unskilled bad actor or terrorist group that works from a garage laboratory. AI chatbots could help them skill up, by compiling relevant information, planning experiments and troubleshooting problems. It’s likely the work would focus on using existing pathogens and toxins. The other risk comes from well-resourced organisations and nation states that have plenty of skilled scien

    匹配字段正文

  4. Artificial Analysis

    Artificial Analysis 评测:Grok Voice 3.0 登顶语音到语音指数 86.9

    Artificial Analysis 评测显示,SpaceXAI 的 Grok Voice 3.0 以 86.9 分登顶其 Speech to Speech Index,高于 GPT-Live-1(Astra, medium)的 83.2 和 Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking(High)的 82.6,较 Grok Voice 2.0 的 81.3 提升 5.6 分。该模型通过 SpaceXAI Realtime API 提供,每分钟 0.08 美元,输入音频每小时 4.80 美元;在 Speech Agent Arena 任务成功率上以 94.8% 居首,Big Bench Audio 音频推理得 98.5%,Big Bench Audio 平均首音频延迟 0.81 秒,慢于 Grok Voice 2.0 的 0.70 秒。

    2.6 and GPT-Live-1 (Sol, low) at 80.1. It is up on Grok Voice 2.0 at 81.3 (+5.6 points) and Grok Voice 1.0 at 73.7 (+13.2 points), released just under six months ago. The Index averages Speech Reasoning (Big Bench Audio), Agentic Performance (Tau Voice), Arena Preference, and Task Success Rate ➤ Speech Agent Arena: Grok Voice 3.0 ranks 3 in preference at Elo 1070, behind Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Minimal (1100) and Gemini 3.8 Live (1088) and ahead of GPT-Live-1 (Sol, low) at 1057, and 1 on Task Succ

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Google Developers Blog精选

    Google 用 Gemini 4 Argon 一夜优化 20 万行 Python 代码库

    Google 在 Gemini 4 Argon 发布时做了一次无人值守实验,让模型在 11 小时内优化开源框架 google/adk-python,该仓库约 20.5 万行代码、近 800 个源文件和近 1.7 万个单元测试。模型提出 6 项优化,经人工评审后 2 项合入主干,长会话的内存会话准备时间减少约 40%,冷启动导入提速 21%。文章公开了所用提示词、.agents/skills 规则文件和被拒的 4 项改动原因,并说明如何在自有代码库复现这一夜间工作流。

    banner_option_1_no_four

    anted to see what Argon would do when given only the outcome the team cared about. In round one, we tested Argon with zero custom repository instructions. We gave it this single-paragraph prompt: Make ADK add no noticeable overhead to any agent: at startup, in long sessions, in multi-agent and workflow setups. Keep what the model receives and the public API unchanged, and back each change with a test that would catch a regression. Round one ran for about two hours. Argon wrote a benchmark script

    匹配字段正文

  2. 小米 MiMo 官网发布与博客

    小米详解 MiMo-V2.5 推理系统优化实践

    小米 MiMo 团队发布 MiMo-V2.5 系列推理系统的端到端工程实践,覆盖 KVCache 管理、分层缓存、SWA 感知前缀缓存树、调度策略、Prefill/Decode 执行流水线与多模态优化。MiMo-V2.5-Pro 共 70 层,其中 10 层 Full Attention、60 层 SWA,滑动窗口为 128,Hybrid SWA 使计算量与 KVCache 存储降至 Full Attention 的约 1/7。团队称上线以来服务端 KV Cache 命中率平均 93%,重度用户可达 95% 以上,并将部分优化以 PR 形式回馈 SGLang 社区。

    Attention FLOPs vs sequence length: Full Attention vs Hybrid SWA, roughly a 7.0× compute reduction

    The V2.5 model family, including MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro, combines several architectural design choices: Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (Hybrid SWA) compresses KVCache storage to roughly 1/7 that of Full Attention; sparse MoE activation cuts per-token compute while preserving model capacity; and multimodal encoders enable cross-modal understanding across vision, audio, and video. Together, these features give the MiMo-V2.5 series significant performance and efficiency potential in long-cont

    匹配字段正文

  3. TensorZero 工程博客

    TensorZero 如何用每次 Git 提交自动评估 AI 编码助手

    TensorZero 工程博客介绍了一套自动评估 AI 编码助手的方法:用 tree-sitter 把 LLM 生成的代码片段和 Git 提交中的新增代码解析成语法树,再用树编辑距离(TED)计算两者的最小差异,归一化后得到 0 到 1 的奖励值,作为反馈写回 TensorZero。该流程以 Rust 二进制实现,可作为 post-commit git hook 在每次提交后自动运行,并通过 rayon 并行计算。作者称其 CTO Viraj 的个人使用数据显示 GPT-4.1 的效果不如 Claude 3.7 Sonnet、Gemini 2.5 Pro 和 o4-mini,但强调这只是初步结果,不主张某个模型普遍更优。

    Diagram: CursorZero with Feedback Loop

    m exhaustively evaluates every candidate subtree to guarantee the closest match. Each distance is normalized by the size of the LLM snippet, yielding a ratio in [0, 1]. We then average these ratios across all snippets in the inference, and compute the reward is then computed as 1 - average ratio. A perfect match receives a score of 1, while lower scores indicate poorer performance. Formally, say that an LLM inference outputs nnn code snippets with corresponding concrete syntax trees I={t1,…,tn}I

    匹配字段正文

  4. TensorZero 工程博客

    TensorZero 实测 OpenAI RFT:成本是 SFT 的 100-700 倍,值不值?

    TensorZero 在数据抽取、智能体编码和客服三个任务上对比了 OpenAI 的 RFT 与 SFT,RFT 成本是同等数据量 SFT 的 100-700 倍。RFT 仅在智能体编码任务上明显优于 SFT,数据抽取上更大数据集的 SFT 效果更好且成本低 159 倍,客服任务上 RFT 反而比基线更差。作者还指出 RFT 会触发比 SFT 更严格的内容审核,导致部分公开基准数据集无法通过验证。

    Fine-Tuning for o4-mini on terminal-benchThe script below demonstrates how to fine-tune o4-mini on terminal-bench using TensorZero’s programmatic API; Deploy with confidence: Leverage the experimentation features to gradually route traffic to your fine-tuned models, starting with a small allocation and scaling based on performance metrics So, is reinforcement fine-tuning worth it? For most use cases, not yet. At 100-700x the cost of supervised fine-tuning, we only observed RFT to deliver clear

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. NVIDIA Developer · Generative AI

    NVIDIA 如何用 AI 智能体重写 Apache Spark UDF 实现 GPU 加速

    NVIDIA 介绍用 AI 智能体重写 Apache Spark UDF 的方法,通过 Spark SQL 表达式、RapidsUDF 接口或 JNI 调用自定义 CUDA kernel 三种方式消除 CPU 回退,实现 20 倍以上加速。cuDF skills for Apache Spark 将重写拆成测试、转换、基准测试和优化四个带验证反馈的环节。一家大型消费科技公司用该流程改造了 30 多个生产 UDF,其中一个 UDF 影响 3000 多个作业,改写后提速 22 倍。

    L; T; F; R; E AI-Generated Summary NVIDIA cuDF plugin for Apache Spark leverages GPU parallelism to accelerate data analytics workloads and improve total cost of ownership; User-defined functions in Spark break the declarative abstraction, forcing GPU-accelerated pipelines to fall back to CPU execution and incur data transfer overhead; UDFs can be rewritten using Spark SQL expressions, the RapidsUDF interface with the Java API for cuDF, or custom CUDA kernels via JNI to eliminate fallback and ac

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. OpenAI Developers

    OpenAI 谈如何为 GPT-6 Astra 重写 skills 与提示词

    OpenAI Developers 发文说明,随着模型能力提升,为 Codex 等编码智能体积累的 skills、AGENTS.md 和任务提示词需要重新审视,GPT-6 Astra 尤其如此。文章建议 skill 描述尽量简短并明确使用时机,多流程 skill 用根文档做最小路由实现渐进披露,避免写成过于具体的步骤清单。AGENTS.md 中要求每次编辑前通读文档、强制跑测试等旧指令可能浪费上下文,而 GPT-6 Astra 会自行检查工作,但可能更早停下等待确认,因此需要提前定义完成标准。

    rn context and slow work down. Pointing to some docs can still be helpful, however, so long as it is contextual. Be sure to keep your docs updated too! Previous models needed encouragement to run tests and check their work. GPT-6 Astra does that on its own, so the same instructions can lead to unnecessary testing. GPT-6 Astra is thorough, but it can be more tentative about how far to take a task. Sometimes it needs a little push to keep going. You can use AGENTS.md to give it permission for a sp

    匹配字段正文

  2. OpenAI Developers精选

    OpenAI 开发者分享如何用 Astra 在 Codex 中构建游戏

    OpenAI 开发者撰文介绍如何用 Astra 在 Codex 中构建游戏,并以太空探索游戏 Void Explorer 为例,展示从概念图、架构设计到地形流式加载与性能测试的完整流程。Void Explorer 包含 2,048 个恒星系和超过 10,000 颗程序化生成的行星,行星最大可与地球相当。作者还提到用同一方式开发了水面渲染的 Sunwake 和 2D 动作 RPG Hollowflux,并可通过 Sites 插件发布为浏览器游戏。

    . Atmosphere changes with physical altitude, and clouds move over the planet’s geography. They help connect the orbital view to the landscape. The renderer only removes coarse coverage where finer terrain is ready. Mountain silhouettes can still change as finer geometry appears. Landing adds a stricter requirement. The visible ground, collision triangles, and liquid hazards for a contact patch must all come from the same generation and become ready together. Walking uses Rapier in a small local

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. TensorZero 工程博客

    OpenAI 的强化微调 RFT 值得用吗?TensorZero 在三个任务上做了基准测试

    TensorZero 在数据抽取、智能体编码和客服三个任务上对比了 OpenAI 的 RFT 与 SFT,RFT 成本是 SFT 的 100-700 倍。RFT 在智能体编码任务上明显优于 SFT,但数据抽取用 SFT 效果更好且成本低 159 倍,客服任务中 RFT 反而比基线更差。作者还指出 RFT 触发了比 SFT 更严格的内容审核,导致部分公开基准数据集无法通过验证。

    Fine-Tuning for o4-mini on terminal-benchThe script below demonstrates how to fine-tune o4-mini on terminal-bench using TensorZero’s programmatic API; Deploy with confidence: Leverage the experimentation features to gradually route traffic to your fine-tuned models, starting with a small allocation and scaling based on performance metrics So, is reinforcement fine-tuning worth it? For most use cases, not yet. At 100-700x the cost of supervised fine-tuning, we only observed RFT to deliver clear

    匹配字段正文

  2. Comfy Blog

    我如何在单张 GPU 上用 MiniMax H3 生成实时视频

    作者在单张 RTX 5090(32 GB 显存)上运行 MiniMax H3,目标是 15 秒内生成 15 秒、448×256 的可看视频,并把显存需求从 80GB 降到 30GB 以下。实现基于 FastVideo 的 FastH3 V2 checkpoint 四步采样,配合 VSA 稀疏注意力、ClipProj 将 32B 文本编码器换成 Qwen3-VL-4B、FastVideo 的 INT8 剪枝 checkpoint、融合 FP4 MLP 以及 Kijai 的 INT8 视频解码器与 NVENC 重叠编解码。作者已将自定义 Comfy 节点开源在 https://github.com/Comfy-Org/comfystreamerh3,并指出画面细节、一致性和分辨率仍有明显提升空间。

    Bryan Wade's avatar

    are, there exists a problem. And that problem is cost. Running these models continuously can cost an upwards of 6k per day! This makes these models completely unusable for the average consumer. The goal So the question I asked is how far can these models be pushed? What if you had an agent search the internet for every optimization, every speed up, every cost savings, and definitely every dirty hack that sacrificed quality for speed. And then what if you put it all together into a single custom

    匹配字段正文

  3. NVIDIA Developer · Generative AI

    NVIDIA KGMON 团队分享 KDD Cup 2026 数据分析智能体亚军方案

    NVIDIA KGMON 团队在 KDD Cup 2026 Data Agents 竞赛中获得第二名,方案核心是在固定的小模型外构建更小、更清晰、更易验证的 harness。团队把 CSV 和 JSON 统一转成 SQLite 表,只暴露 schema() 和 sql(query) 等少量工具,并在主推理循环前加入 schema 预检步骤,减少路由错误并保留模型的推理能力。文档检查与结构化分析分离,prose_helper 用零温度、关闭推理的独立 LLM 调用抽取答案或表格,避免原始文本占用主上下文;执行轨迹记录提示词、工具调用和中间结果,供专门的 inspector agent 归类失败原因。

    s from recent runs and recommend harness changes. Figure 6 shows how a trace reveals the first wrong decision. 7. Evaluate multiple attempts, but watch the cost KGMON improved coverage and reliability through repeated attempts and answer selection. It grouped attempts by answer values rather than column names and could give contested tasks additional runs. Multiple attempts helped distinguish stable answers from one-off mistakes under the leaderboard’s exact value-level scoring. Important caveat

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. MarkTechPost

    Laya 零样本决策与校准开发者指南:在 CLINC150 上实测路由与概率

    MarkTechPost 发布 Laya 开发者教程,用 CLINC150 银行域 15 个意图的 450 条测试查询实测这个 4.21 亿参数非自回归决策引擎。Laya 零样本路由准确率 0.804,改用不带描述的裸意图名后升到 0.878,而 TF-IDF 加逻辑回归需每个意图 10 到 30 条标注样本才能达到 0.848 和 0.904。作者还发现随包温度表中 11 个以上选项的条目为 0.10 会被钳制到 0.5,单次 fit_temperatures 会重置未见问题类型的温度,按选项数分桶拟合后测试集校准误差从 0.102 降到 0.059。

    router was never built for, so we add 150 out-of-scope CLINC queries and 150 queries from other CLINC domains. The calibrated confidence separates them sharply: banking queries average 0.912, the others about 0.25, and the 5 percent gate stops 89.3 percent of other-domain queries and 93.3 percent of out-of-scope ones while abstaining on 7.8 percent of banking queries. The alternative needs no labeled data: a sixteenth option, not a banking request, catches 80.0 and 90.0 percent of them, at the c

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Anthropic:Claude.dev 开发者博客

    Claude Code 云端会话实战指南:工作流、GitHub 连接与环境配置

    Anthropic 发布 Claude Code 云端会话实战指南,说明云端会话在独立虚拟机上运行,每个任务克隆仓库到新分支,可从 claude.ai/code、移动端、桌面端、终端和 Slack 启动,Pro、Max、Team、Enterprise 套餐无需额外付费。文章给出七个适用工作流,包括并行清理任务、反复验证修复、桌面规划云端构建、手机查看进度、处理 CI 失败与评审意见、用 routine 触发任务,以及运行不完全信任的代码。指南还说明 GitHub 连接需要登录授权和安装 Claude GitHub App 两项独立权限,并给出环境配置、网络级别和常见问题解答。

    nd network levels, see the cloud environments docs. LOCAL OR CLOUD? Cloud sessions don't replace local ones, and most people use both. The table shows where they differ, and the paragraphs after it say when each one fits. Stay local when the task needs something only your machine has. That covers a database with real local data, a service you reach over VPN, a GPU, a phone simulator, or hardware on your desk. Stay local too for tight visual loops where you want to see each change in your own bro

    匹配字段正文

  2. SemiAnalysis

    SemiAnalysis 实测:Anthropic 订阅价值约为 OpenAI 的 5 倍以上

    SemiAnalysis 对 Anthropic、OpenAI、Meta、MiniMax、Moonshot、Z.ai、Cursor、Cognition 等订阅计划逐一做了额度实测,按模型与工作负载换算成 API 等价价值。在中端模型上,Anthropic 的 Opus 5.5 提供的 API 等价价值约为 OpenAI 的 5 倍;OpenAI 上周把 200 美元档额度减半并新增 500 美元档,使 Pro 100、200、500 每美元 token 数趋于一致。文章还给出按 token 类型(输入、缓存写入、缓存读取、输出)测量额度消耗的方法,并指出厂商可随时通过调整 credit 成本静默改变额度。

    ng 100% utilization and 92% API gross margins, maxing out Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 usage corresponds to -369% and 1% gross margins respectively. If we were to use a more realistic average utilization of 20%, then gross margins rise to 6% and 80% respectively. In other words, Anthropic would likely already have software like margins on their subscription plans if everyone only used Fable. Opus class models will continue to become cheaper to serve over time as Anthropic figures out how to make the mo

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. OpenRouter:Announcements

    OpenRouter 对比 OpenAI、Anthropic、Google 的服务端代码执行工具

    OpenRouter 发文对比 OpenAI、Anthropic、Google 及自家提供的服务端代码执行工具,说明模型在 API 请求内调用工具、由服务商在隔离容器中执行命令并回传输出。OpenRouter 的 openrouter:shell 支持 Responses 与 Messages API 上的任意模型,openrouter:bash 仅支持 Messages API,两者均为 beta,沙箱默认关闭出站网络,按每秒 0.0001 美元计费、新容器最低 30 秒。文章指出需要自定义基础镜像、GPU 或数小时长会话时,仍应自建 E2B、Modal、Daytona 等沙箱平台。

    Server-Side Code Execution Tools for AI Agents, Compared

    s Python and Bash in a sandbox Anthropic manages, on the Messages API. The documented environment is a Linux x86 64 container with Python 3.11, 5 GiB of RAM, 5 GiB of workspace storage, and one CPU. Internet access is disabled and no outbound connections are permitted, so Claude works with the preinstalled libraries and can’t install a package during a run. Three tool versions exist, and every supported model accepts all three. code execution 20250825 supports Bash commands and file operations.

    匹配字段正文