Claude Fable 5 在 BU Bench 拿下 80% 高分
Browser Use 用开源 Browser Use 库在 BU Bench V1 上测试 Anthropic 的 Claude Fable 5,得分 80.0%,比第二名 GPT 5.5 高出 12 分。100 个任务中通过 80 个,20 个失败里 16 个判定错误、4 个触发 30 分钟超时,平均每任务耗时 6 分 53 秒,100 个任务 API 成本为 580.87 美元。Fable 的失败主要来自提取错误事实或选错实体、无法充分访问或搜索来源、答案缺乏轨迹支撑,与 GPT 5.5 常因多步骤任务未完成而失败的模式不同。
minute task timeout. Tasks took 6m 53s on average. That makes Fable slower per task than GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and BU 2.0, but faster than Gemini 3 Pro, Qwen 3.6 Plus, Kimi K2.6, and DeepSeek V4 Pro. The cost comparison makes the tradeoff clear. Fable completed many of the long research and browsing tasks that usually separate stronger web agents from weaker ones. These are tasks that require following many steps of reasoning, checking constraints, and returning a structured answer rather than extr
匹配字段正文





