←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 174 条结果 清除搜索

星期三

  1. Ahead of AI

    2026 年 1—2 月开放权重 LLM 架构对比:10 组主要模型发布

    作者对 2026 年 1—2 月的主要开放权重 LLM 发布进行架构对比,并补充了 3 月 6 日发布的 Sarvam 30B 和 105B。文章逐一分析 Trinity Large、Kimi K2.5、Step 3.5 Flash、Qwen3-Coder-Next、GLM-5、MiniMax M2.5、Nanbeige 4.1 3B、Qwen3.5、Ling 2.5、Ring 2.5 与 Tiny Aya,重点比较 MoE、混合注意力、MLA、Gated DeltaNet、滑动窗口注意力和 MTP 等设计。作者认为,近期架构普遍加入计算效率优化,但模型表现也很大程度取决于数据质量和训练方案。

    tly below Claude Opus 4.5), which is impressive for a relatively small open-weight model! Using the ollama version of Qwen3-Coder-Next locally, the model takes about 48.2 GB of storage space and 51 GB of RAM. Note that the architecture behind Qwen3-Coder-Next is exactly the same as Qwen3-Next 80B (in fact, the pre-trained Qwen3-Next 80B is used as a base model for further mid- and post-training). Figure 16 below shows the Qwen3-Next architecture next to a regular Qwen3 235B model for reference.

    匹配字段正文

  2. Browser Use

    Browser Use 如何构建安全可扩展的 Agent 沙箱基础设施

    Browser Use 分享了其 Agent 沙箱架构的演进:从最初在 AWS Lambda 上运行浏览器智能体,到把整个智能体放进沙箱、通过控制平面持有全部凭证的 Pattern 2。生产环境每个智能体运行在独立的 Unikraft micro-VM 中,启动不到一秒,仅接收 SESSION_TOKEN、CONTROL_PLANE_URL 和 SESSION_ID 三个环境变量,本地开发和评测则用同一镜像跑 Docker 容器。控制平面作为无状态 FastAPI 代理,统一处理 LLM 调用、S3 文件同步和计费,代价是每次操作多一次网络跳转。

    Pattern 1: Single backend with agent loop and isolated terminal use sandbox

    sandbox, talk to the outside world through a control plane). We went with Pattern 2. The control plane holds all credentials and acts as a proxy for everything: LLM calls, file storage, billing. The sandbox receives three env variables and has no access to anything else. It runs as a Unikraft micro-VM in production and a Docker container in development and evals. Same image everywhere. The tradeoff is an extra network hop on every operation and three services to deploy instead of one. In practic

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Modal 官方工程博客精选

    Ramp 如何在 Modal 上构建全上下文后台编码智能体

    Ramp 基于 Modal Sandboxes 构建内部后台编码智能体 Inspect,目前 Ramp 前后端仓库约一半的已合并 PR 由它发起,Inspect 自身超过 80% 的代码也由它编写。每个会话运行在包含 Postgres、Redis、Temporal、RabbitMQ 等完整开发环境的沙箱中,OpenCode 作为编码智能体,配合 VS Code server、Web 终端和带 Chromium 的 VNC 做前端可视化验证。Modal 的 Cron 每 30 分钟克隆仓库并生成文件系统快照,会话从最新快照启动,几秒内即可开始处理提示词,并支持 Slack、Web、Chrome 扩展等多客户端与多人协作。

    Ramp Inspect UI

    Ramp uses Modal to power Ramp Inspect, an internal background coding agent that now writes over half of all merged pull requests at Ramp. Leveraging Modal Sandboxes, Ramp spins up full development environments in seconds, giving every builder at the company access to what is effectively unlimited parallel engineering capacity grounded by Ramp’s internal codebase, enterprise context, and developer tooling. The idea: A coding agent as fast as local, accessible to everyone Ramp's AI team saw an opp

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Mistral AI精选

    堆也会撒谎:调试 vLLM 内存泄漏

    Mistral AI 定位了 vLLM 在 Mistral Medium 3.1、图编译及 Prefill/Decode 分离部署下每分钟增长 400 MB 的内存泄漏,根因是 NIXL 依赖的 UCX 拦截 mmap,并让待清理区域在 RCache 失效队列中累积。设置 UCX_MEM_MMAP_HOOK_MODE=none 可消除泄漏且未影响性能,另可将 UCX_RCACHE_MAX_UNRELEASED 设为 1024;相关修复已合并至 vLLM,UCX 与 NIXL 团队也计划在未来版本中调整行为。

    E2f0fa05 5d77 4acc Ac9b 43e10db5769c Copie

    youts. This pattern could also result from repeated cycles of munmap followed by mmap , where memory is freed and reallocated but the total usage continues to grow, either due to fragmentation, leaks in custom allocators, or improper resizing logic. In our case, the changing addresses and growing size strongly suggested that memory was being reallocated but never properly released. This was our first concrete indication that the leak wasn’t in the heap but in anonymous memory regions being resiz

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Replit Blog精选

    Replit 详解决策时引导:如何让 Replit Agent 在长任务中保持可靠

    Replit 提出决策时引导(decision-time guidance),用一个轻量多标签分类器判断当前轨迹需要哪条微指令,只在相关时注入,从而把控制从单一系统提示词拆成可复用的指令库。文中称,把鼓励并行工具调用的短提示词放在轨迹末尾,比放在系统提示词中让智能体每轮多执行 15% 的工具调用;而决策时注入超过三到四条提醒后收益递减甚至为负。由于核心提示词不变、注入内容不留在对话历史中,该方案相比动态修改系统提示词可降低成本 90%。

    Decision-Time Guidance: Keeping Replit Agent Reliable — cover image

    em in the world—one that amplifies their productivity and minimizes the time from idea to product. Today, Replit Agent tackles more complex tasks than ever before. As a result, average session durations have increased and trajectories have grown longer, with the agent completing more work autonomously. But longer trajectories introduce a novel challenge: model-based failures can compound, and unexpected behaviors can surface. Every trajectory is unique, so static prompt-based rules often fail to

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Ahead of AI精选

    DeepSeek V3 至 V3.2 模型技术演进全览

    DeepSeek V3.2 延续 V3 系列架构,并引入 DeepSeek Sparse Attention、自验证、自改进及多项 GRPO 训练调整。文章梳理了 V3、R1、V3.1、V3.2-Exp、DeepSeekMath V2 和 V3.2-Speciale 的演进,解释 MLA、RLVR 与混合推理模式等关键机制。更新部分还介绍了用于改善训练稳定性和收敛表现的 mHC 残差路径研究。

    anism powered by a lightning indexer, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp achieves significant efficiency improvements in both training and inference, especially in long-context scenarios. As the paragraph above states, the main innovation here is the DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) mechanism that they add to DeepSeek V3.1-Terminus before doing further training on that checkpoint. This DSA consists of (1) a lightning indexer and (2) a token-selector, and the goal is to selectively reduce the context to improve ef

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Johann Rehberger / Embrace The Red

    Google Antigravity IDE 被曝五类安全漏洞,含远程命令执行与数据外泄

    安全研究者 Johann Rehberger 在 Google 新发布的 Antigravity IDE 中发现五个安全漏洞,包括通过间接提示注入实现的远程命令执行和数据外泄,其中部分问题可追溯到 2025 年 5 月他向 Windsurf 报告过的同类缺陷。Antigravity 默认由 AI 自行判断终端命令是否安全执行,且 MCP 工具调用完全没有人工确认环节,攻击者可利用不可见的 Unicode Tag 字符在源码或 Linear 工单中隐藏指令。作者建议禁用自动执行、谨慎启用 MCP 服务器,并指出 Claude Code、GitHub Copilot、Cursor、Codex 等编码智能体在安全性和补丁历史上更成熟。

    idden Unicode Tags programmatically could be helpful. Even reviewing code manually for malicious instructions carefully does not help to mitigate prompt injection attacks that leverage hidden Unicode Tags; Developers should consider alternative IDEs until these issues are addressed; Disable “Auto-Execute” (the default) and use manual approvals, and carefully enable only commands that you would entrust the AI via “Allow List Terminal Commands”; If your organization uses this IDE widely, it might

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. One Useful Thing

    从 GPT-3 到 Gemini 3:Ethan Mollick 实测三年 AI 进展

    Ethan Mollick 实测 Google 新发布的 Gemini 3,用同一提示词让模型把三年前只能写诗的演示变成可玩的互动游戏,并称其在多数基准上取得领先。他还测试了随 Gemini 3 一同发布的编程工具 Antigravity,让它自主完成网页研究、建站并在浏览器中验证;随后又让 Gemini 3 清理十年前众筹研究的旧数据文件,自主提出假设、做统计分析并写出 14 页论文,还自创了一个衡量众筹创意独特性的指标。他认为这些工具仍有需要人工纠正的判断问题,但人机关系正从修复 AI 错误转向指挥 AI 工作。

    ly show you the difference. The tweet you shared is from November 2022—right on the cusp of the modern AI boom. Back then, the “wow factor” was that an AI could write a coherent paragraph or a simple poem about a silly concept like a “candy-powered FTL drive escaping otters.” To demonstrate how far we’ve come, I’m not just going to write text about it. I have built you a fully interactive, playable Candy-Powered FTL Starship Simulator . In 2022, AI could describe the engine. In 2025, AI can code

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. vLLM 官方博客

    vLLM 与 TorchTitan 实现训练推理逐位一致的在线强化学习

    vLLM 与 TorchTitan 开源展示了逐位一致的在线强化学习方案,使 Qwen3 1.7B 的训练与推理数值完全匹配。实验中启用逐位一致性后,模型用更少步骤取得更高总奖励,但当前运行速度比非逐位一致方案慢 2.4x。

    vLLM as the inference framework. We audited every single invocation of every kernel during the forward pass to make sure they are bitwise equivalent across the frameworks. We leveraged the forward pass kernels from vLLM’s recent batch invariance work and wrote simple backward passes for these ops. vLLM has many heavily optimized fused operations, such as the SiLU MLPs and RMSNorms (with added residuals). To maintain bitwise equivalence, we imported the exact operations for the forward passes. T

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. A6 a6-047 · Baseten 工程博客

    用于牙科笔记记录的专用大语言模型

    Baseten 微调了一款牙科笔记专用模型,以单个 rank 256 LoRA adapter 完成临床笔记生成、实时补充和笔记修改三项任务,准确率媲美 gemini-2.5-pro,响应速度快 5–6 倍。团队使用 Lumina 评估器和 iSFT 处理 30,000 个训练样本,并通过合成数据生成超过 50,000 个样本,使模型在四种牙位标记系统评测中达到 90% 准确率。

    purpose built LLM

    000 training examples: Generate: Model produces initial clinical note from transcript; Evaluate: Lumina evaluators identify specific failures (e.g., “incorrect tooth notation in paragraph 3”); Refine: Model repairs its output based on structured feedback; Iterate: Repeat until all six evaluators pass; Train: Use these perfect outputs for supervised fine-tuning This process is fundamentally different from standard distillation. Instead of training on "what GPT-5 would say," we train on outputs th

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Ahead of AI

    标准 LLM 之外有哪些替代架构

    Sebastian Raschka 梳理了标准自回归 Transformer 之外的线性注意力混合架构、文本扩散模型、代码世界模型和小型递归 Transformer。文章比较了这些路线在长上下文效率、生成质量、代码建模和专用推理上的取舍,并认为通用项目目前仍应优先采用成熟的自回归 Transformer。

    nto this category.) Since I talked and wrote about transformer-based LLMs so many times, I assume you are familiar with the broad idea and architecture. If you’d like a deeper coverage, I compared the architectures listed above (and shown in the figure below) in my The Big LLM Architecture Comparison article. (Side note: I could have grouped Qwen3-Next and Kimi Linear with the other transformer-state space model (SSM) hybrids in the overview figure. Personally, I see these other transformer-SSM

    匹配字段正文

  2. Anthropic Engineering精选

    Anthropic 工程博客:用代码执行让 MCP 智能体更高效

    Anthropic 工程博客提出用代码执行替代直接工具调用,把 MCP 服务器呈现为文件系统上的代码 API,让智能体按需加载工具定义并在执行环境中过滤数据。文中给出的 Google Drive 到 Salesforce 示例把 token 用量从 150,000 降到 2,000,节省 98.7%。文章还介绍了渐进式披露、结果过滤、隐私保护与状态持久化等做法,并提醒运行智能体生成的代码需要沙箱、资源限制和监控。

    (MCP) is an open standard for connecting AI agents to external systems. Connecting agents to tools and data traditionally requires a custom integration for each pairing, creating fragmentation and duplicated effort that makes it difficult to scale truly connected systems. MCP provides a universal protocol—developers implement MCP once in their agent and it unlocks an entire ecosystem of integrations. Since launching MCP in November 2024, adoption has been rapid: the community has built thousands

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. vLLM 官方博客精选

    vLLM Sleep Mode 如何实现模型零重载切换

    vLLM Sleep Mode 通过保留进程、内存分配器、CUDA 图和 JIT 内核,将多模型切换从完整重载的 30-100+ 秒缩短至秒级或亚秒级。Level 1 将权重卸载到 CPU RAM,Level 2 丢弃权重并在唤醒时从磁盘重载;两种模式的切换速度比完整重载快 18-200x,预热模型的推理速度比冷启动快 61-88%。

    ed: Process state, allocator instance, CUDA graphs, and compiled JIT kernels all intact; No recompilation needed: Kernels were compiled during initial warmup and remain cached; Average per switch: 2.6s (see benchmark data above) No Sleep Mode Reality: Weight reload from SSD (same as Level 2); Everything else rebuilt: Process restart + allocator init + graph re-capture; JIT kernels: Full compilation + explicit warm-up routine (kernel warmup() + dummy runs); Average per switch: 48s (see benchmark

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. vLLM 官方博客

    SemiAnalysis InferenceMAX 评测解析:vLLM 与 NVIDIA 加速 Blackwell 推理

    vLLM 与 NVIDIA 针对 Blackwell 优化大语言模型推理,在相近延迟下,gpt-oss 120B 和 Llama 3.3 70B 的吞吐量较上一代 Hopper 最高提升约 4x。双方通过一百多个 pull request 优化注意力、GEMM、MoE 内核、图融合和异步调度,并加入自动量化后端选择与 FlashInfer 自动调优。SemiAnalysis InferenceMAX 每日更新测试结果,以不同输入输出长度和 Pareto 前沿比较吞吐量与响应速度。

    ipeline - from custom kernels (attention, GEMM, MoE) to high-level scheduling and overhead removal. This blog provides a detailed breakdown of these optimizations and how they leverage Blackwell’s architectural features into production performance gains. Overview of InferenceMax SemiAnalysis InferenceMax is a benchmark framework designed for automated, recurring tests on LLM serving performance, with results updated daily to reflect software performance changes. This approach narrows the gap bet

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. Ahead of AI

    从零理解 LLM 评估的四种主要方法

    文章讲解评估 LLM 的四种主要方法,包括多项选择、验证器、排行榜和 LLM 评审,并配有从零代码实现。不同方法分别侧重知识准确率、可验证任务、用户偏好和整体回答质量,各有成本、偏差与适用范围,因此模型评估应组合多种方法,并使用贴合目标领域的数据。

    e balls into 2 indistinguishable boxes? The model prompt, as shown above, provides the model with a list of the different answer choices and ends with an “Answer: “ text that encourages the model to generate the correct answer. While it is not strictly necessary, it can sometimes also be helpful to provide additional questions along with the correct answers as input, so that the model can observe how it is expected to solve the task. (For example, cases where 5 examples are provided are also kno

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Anthropic Engineering精选

    Anthropic 谈 AI 智能体的有效上下文工程

    Anthropic 应用 AI 团队撰文提出上下文工程,将其视为提示词工程的延续,核心是在 LLM 有限的注意力预算内挑选最小的高信号 token 集合。文章指出随着上下文 token 增多,模型准确召回信息的能力会下降,即上下文衰减,因此系统提示词、工具、示例和消息历史都应保持信息充分而紧凑。针对长周期任务,文章介绍了压缩、结构化笔记和多智能体架构三种绕开上下文窗口限制的做法,并提到 Claude Code 采用即时检索与预加载结合的混合策略。

    zone between two common failure modes. At one extreme, we see engineers hardcoding complex, brittle logic in their prompts to elicit exact agentic behavior. This approach creates fragility and increases maintenance complexity over time. At the other extreme, engineers sometimes provide vague, high-level guidance that fails to give the LLM concrete signals for desired outputs or falsely assumes shared context. The optimal altitude strikes a balance: specific enough to guide behavior effectively,

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Anthropic Engineering精选

    Anthropic 工程团队分享如何为智能体编写高效工具

    Anthropic 工程团队发布文章,介绍为 LLM 智能体编写高效工具的流程:先搭建工具原型并在本地测试,再用贴近真实场景的评测任务衡量表现,最后借助 Claude Code 分析评测记录并迭代改进。文章给出的原则包括只实现少量针对高价值工作流的工具、用命名空间区分功能边界、只返回高信号上下文、通过分页与截断控制 token 消耗,以及像向新同事介绍那样提示词工程化地写工具描述。文中提到 Claude Code 默认将工具响应限制在 25,000 tokens,并称在精确改进工具描述后 Claude Sonnet 3.5 在 SWE-bench Verified 上达到 SOTA。

    ls at the right time. We have found selecting between prefix- and suffix-based namespacing to have non-trivial effects on our tool-use evaluations. Effects vary by LLM and we encourage you to choose a naming scheme according to your own evaluations. Agents might call the wrong tools, call the right tools with the wrong parameters, call too few tools, or process tool responses incorrectly. By selectively implementing tools whose names reflect natural subdivisions of tasks, you simultaneously redu

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. vLLM 官方博客

    深入 vLLM:高吞吐 LLM 推理系统架构解析

    文章系统解析 vLLM V1 如何从单 GPU 离线推理扩展到多 GPU、多节点异步服务。内容涵盖调度器、PagedAttention、连续批处理、前缀缓存、引导解码、推测解码、P/D 分离及分布式请求链路,并说明如何用 vllm bench 衡量延迟与吞吐量。分析基于 2025 年 8 月 9 日的 commit 42172ad。

    ecode workers read from it. This isolates long, bursty prefill from steady, latency-sensitive decode. How does this work in vLLM? For clarity, the example below relies on SharedStorageConnector, a debugging connector implementation used to illustrate the mechanics. Note: Connector is vLLM's abstraction for handling the exchange of KVs between instances. Connector interface is not yet stable, there are some near-term improvements planned which will involve changes, some potentially breaking. We l

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. vLLM 官方博客

    vLLM 使用 CUDA Core Dump 调试非法内存访问问题

    vLLM 介绍了如何启用 CUDA core dump,在非法内存访问发生时保存 GPU 状态,并用 cuda-gdb 定位出错的 CUDA kernel。文章给出推荐的环境变量组合,演示其定位普通 kernel 启动和 CUDA graph 内异常的流程,并说明生产环境性能影响、无法触发转储的错误类型及调试符号配置。

    ses, you can use the CUDA COREDUMP FILE environment variable to specify a file path template for the coredump file. For example, you can store the coredump file in a persistent storage directory: CUDA COREDUMP FILE="/persistent dir/cuda coredump %h.%p.%t", where %h is the hostname, %p is the process ID, and %t is the timestamp of the coredump; By default, the coredump procedure saves the entire GPU context. For programs like large model inference that occupy almost all GPU memory, a full coredum

    匹配字段正文

星期六

  1. Ahead of AI精选

    从 GPT-2 到 gpt-oss:解析 OpenAI 开放权重模型的架构演进

    文章解析 OpenAI 的 gpt-oss-20b 和 gpt-oss-120b,并将其架构与 GPT-2、Qwen3 对比。两款模型采用 MoE、GQA、滑动窗口注意力、RMSNorm 和 MXFP4,其中 20B 模型可装入 16 GB 显存,120B 模型可在单张 80 GB H100 上运行。作者还讨论了宽度与深度、专家规模、推理强度控制及模型幻觉等问题。

    2 paper (Table 9), which found that for a 9B parameter architecture, a wider setup is slightly better than a deeper setup. Across 4 benchmarks, the wider model achieved a 52.0 average score, and the deeper model achieved a 50.8 average score. 3.2 Few Large Versus Many Small Experts As shown in Figure 14 above, it's also noteworthy that gpt-oss has a surprisingly small number of experts (32 instead of 128), and only uses 4 instead of 8 active experts per token. However, each expert is much large

    匹配字段正文