搜索“arXiv”

应让客户陷入困境。 长时间运行的研究与监控智能体：这类智能体跨多个来源展开工作，将发现保留在上下文中，并在数小时后返回综合结果。Muse Glimmer 在 DeepSearch QA（74.6）和 MCP Atlas（75.5）上领先其规模级别，这两项基准最贴近此类工作形态。原生图像输入意味着图表和文档与文本走同一循环——Muse Glimmer 在 CharXiv Reasoning（78.8）上领先其级别。请注意 2026 年 1 月 4 日的知识截止日期，任何时间敏感的内容都需要通过工具获取。 仓库级编码智能体：这类智能体读取仓库、规划变更、运行测试并针对失败进行迭代。Muse Glimmer 在 SWE-Bench Pro（51.2）和 SciCode（43.6）上领先其级别。 基准测试表现 与 Gemma 4 31B 和 Qwen 3.6 27B 相比，Muse Glimmer 在衡量工具编排和持续多轮工作的基准上领先： 基准测试Muse Glimmer 30B（高推理）Gemma 4 31B（思考模式）Qwen 3.6 27B（思考模式）MCP Atlas（公开）75.5

匹配字段正文

Simon Osindero, Sherjil Ozair, Scott Reed, Jingwei Zhang, Konrad Zolna, Jeff Clune, Nando de Freitas, Satinder Singh, Tim Rocktaschel. Genie: Generative Interactive Environments . arXiv:2402.15391, 2024. [2] Google DeepMind. Genie 2: A Large-Scale Foundation World Model . Technical report / blog post, 2024. [3] David Ha, Jurgen Schmidhuber. World Models . arXiv:1803.10122, 2018. [4] Danijar Hafner, Jurgis Pasukonis, Jimmy Ba, Timothy Lillicrap. Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models . ar

匹配字段正文

ms reconstructions across arbitrary subsets of channels and time. This post is an update to Zyphra’s ZUNA1.1 release July 16, 2026. The ZUNA1.1 technical paper is now available on arXiv and an updated version of the EEG Playground is available on Zyphra Cloud, now with more features. EEG is the most accessible window we have into the living brain. It is non-invasive, relatively cheap, and BCI devices are increasingly wearable. However, real EEG recordings are often messy. They come in various le

匹配字段正文

Med, Coauthor-CS, Wiki-CS), heterophilic networks (graphs where connected nodes tend to have dissimilar features, such as Chameleon, Squirrel, Actor), and large-scale graphs (ogbn-arxiv, 169K nodes). Across three downstream tasks (node classification, link prediction, and node clustering), ControlG achieves average ranks of 1.4, 1.9, and 1.8 respectively, consistently outperforming all baselines. Key findings Homophilic graphs: ControlG delivers strong gains over the next-best multitask method (

匹配字段正文

2026k , title = {K-Search: LLM Kernel Generation via Co-Evolving Intrinsic World Model} , author = {Cao, Shiyi and Mao, Ziming and Gonzalez, Joseph E and Stoica, Ion} , journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19128} , year = {2026} } Appendix: Try it yourself The MLX backend is built on top of the open-source K-Search repo, so the results here can be reproduced directly. The steps are: 1. Clone and install 2. Set your credentials Open the relevant script under scripts/ and set three variables at th

匹配字段正文

ry-Efficient Interaction} , author = {Aly Lidayan and Jakob Bjorner and Satvik Golechha and Kartik Goyal and Alane Suhr} , year = {2026} , eprint = {2512.20111} , archivePrefix = {arXiv} , primaryClass = {cs.CL} , url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20111} , } With newer models the number of tokens till 50% compute spend is on attention gets much larger than 25K. Interleaving linear attention alternatives with full attention as is done with gpt-oss and DeepSeekv4, results in massive flops reductio

匹配字段正文

ussions and feedback. Alomrani, Mohammad Ali, Yingxue Zhang, Derek Li, et al. 2025. Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.02076.pdf. Bartz-Beielstein, Thomas, Carola Doerr, Daan van den Berg, et al. 2020. Benchmarking in Optimization: Best Practice and Open Issues. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.03488.pdf. Brown, Bradley, Jordan Juravsky, Ryan Ehrlich, et al. 2024. Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repe

匹配字段正文

d excitement around reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and the development of reasoning models, there is another paper, Kimi K1.5, published on exactly the same day on arXiv (22 Jan 2025). Also, the term RLVR was already coined two months earlier in Tülu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training. One reason why the DeepSeek R1 is ultimately the more popular paper is that it demonstrated that reasoning behavior can be achieved with pure reinforcement learning (RL). For

匹配字段正文

) should carry over to other attempts to build Japanese reward models from English data. References [1] Lambert et al. RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling. arXiv:2403.13787, 2024; [2] Malik et al. RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation. arXiv:2506.01937, 2025; [3] Gureja et al. M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings. ACL 2025. arXiv:2410.15522, 2024; [4] Wang et al. HelpSteer2: Open-source Dataset for Training Top-performing Reward Mode

匹配字段正文

ti, "FrontierCode 1.1," July 7, 2026. cognition.com/blog/frontier-code-1.1; [3]A. Piché et al., "PipelineRL: Faster On-policy Reinforcement Learning for Long Sequence Generation," arXiv:2509.19128, 2025; [4]F. Yao et al., "Your Efficient RL Framework Secretly Brings You Off-Policy RL Training," 2025. fengyao.notion.site/off-policy-rl; [5]B. Pan, C. Baronio, A. Tam, P. Marsella, M. Jain, D. Chiu, Swyx, and S. Alberti, "Introducing SWE-grep and SWE-grep-mini: RL for Multi-Turn, Fast Context Retrie

匹配字段正文

u-s-llm-responses/; [5]P. Huang, Z. Lin, S. Imbot, W. Fu, and E. Tu, "Analysis of LLM bias (Chinese propaganda & anti-US sentiment) in DeepSeek-R1 vs. ChatGPT o3-mini-high," 2025, arXiv:2506.01814; [6]Cyberspace Administration of China, "Interim measures for the management of generative artificial intelligence services," Jul. 2023 (effective Aug. 15, 2023). [Online]. Available: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c 1690898327029107.htm; [7]Center for AI Standards and Innovation, "Evaluation of Dee

匹配字段正文

f-Improvement.” LessWrong, 2008. [3] Choi, et al. “Anchored Self-Play for Code Repair.” ICML 2026. [4] Zhao, et al. “Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03335, 2025. [5] Yuan, et al. “Self-Rewarding Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10020, 2024. [6] Chen, et al. “Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models.” ICML 2024. [7] Zhang, et al. “Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improvi

匹配字段正文

uthors: Fan Nie, Junlin Wang, Harper Hua, Federico Bianchi, Yongchan Kwon, Zhenting Qi, Owen Queen, Shang Zhu, James Zou. With collaborators at Stanford, Duke, and Harvard. Paper: arXiv:2601.16344 Paper 2 ThunderAgent: A Simple, Fast and Program-Aware Agentic Inference System up to 3.6× agent throughput Achieving 1.5 to 3.6x higher serving throughput for agent workloads, with three lines of code to adopt. Parallel agent workloads stop collapsing under load, and the fix is not a faster model. The

匹配字段正文

ari, N. Fujita, and S. Shinomoto. “Four Types of Learning Curves. Neural Computation.” 4(4):605–618, 1992. [2] Hestness et al. “Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00409, 2017. [3] Rosenfeld et al. “A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scales.” ICLR 2020. [4] Kaplan et al. “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361, 2020. [5] Hoffmann et al. “Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models.” NeurIPS

匹配字段正文

lidifying a robust technological foundation for Physical AI that acts reliably in the real world. [1] Gemini Robotics Team, “Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World.” arXiv, 2025. [2] NVIDIA, “GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots.” arXiv, 2025. [3] Figure AI, “Helix: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Generalist Humanoid Control.” Figure AI, 2025. [4] Physical Intelligence, “π?: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control.” arXiv, 2024.

匹配字段正文

rom the model’s ability to reason to the harness’s ability to translate model intent into actions and reflect execution outcomes back to the model. In a paper we just published on arXiv, "Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories", we formalize this bottleneck as the intent-execution gap: the mismatch between what the model intends and what the harness executes, and vice versa. For example, in trying to revise code, a model may intend to edit a single instance of a function, while the

匹配字段正文

nt on HuggingFace, including FP4 quantized weights and DFlash model parameters. Community usage and feedback are welcome: huggingface.co/XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-FP4-DFlash; UltraSpeed support for MiMo-V2.5 is on the way — stay tuned MiMo × TileRT — extreme model-system codesign, delivering 1000 tps output speed for trillion-parameter models. [1] OCP Microscaling Formats (MX) v1.0 Spec: opencompute.org/documents/ocp-microscaling-formats-mx-v1-0-spec-final-pdf [2] DFlash: arxiv.org/abs/2602.06036

匹配字段正文

BF16, synthetic MMLU-style data, and post-training quantization recipes, but covering these in detail would be out of scope for this overview. 1 Jan, Deep Delta Learning, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00417; 6 Jan, MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02780; 13 Jan, Ministral 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08584; 29 Jan, Scaling Embeddings Outperforms Scaling Experts in Language Models, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21204; 30 Jan, LatentLens: Revealing Highly Interpretable Visual

匹配字段正文

perly, ground truth has to become a process. We call that process audit-then-score, and we present it, together with two accompanying datasets, in a paper we recently published to arXiv. When static datasets break down In the standard method for measuring AI performance, human experts label examples, those labels become the “ground truth” (the undisputed correct answers), and models are scored against them. To test this approach with AI-generated research reports, we recruited PhD-level speciali

匹配字段正文

ax Gemini-3.1 Pro Qwen3.6-Plus Qwen3.7-Plus Multimodal Reasoning MMMU-Pro 81.2 73.9 81.8 78.8 79.0 MathVision 91.0 65.5 87.4 88.0 90.3 BabyVision 53.1 12.6 55.9 37.4 70.4 / 64.7 CharXiv(RQ) 84.5 66.0 84.4 81.5 85.9 / 84.4 HiPhO 65.0 40.8 85.4 80.4 84.1 ERQA 67.8 40.8 68.0 65.7 69.8 VisFactor 40.8 24.4 39.8 36.0 42.8 MedXpertQA-MM 77.3 64.4 80.7 68.7 71.0 Visual Agent & Coding ScreenSpot Pro 67.4 49.5 68.1 68.2 79.0 OSWorld-Verified 75.0 72.7 -- 62.5 73.3 AndroidWorld -- 62.0 70.7 67.2 81.0 QwenV

匹配字段正文