←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 358 条结果 清除搜索

星期二

  1. vLLM 官方博客

    vLLM 结构化解码入门与 XGrammar 集成解析

    vLLM 介绍结构化解码的原理与实现,并已支持 Outlines 和 XGrammar 两种后端,以约束大语言模型输出符合指定结构。XGrammar 集成在负载下可将每个输出 token 的生成时间改善至多 5x,不适用的请求会回退至 Outlines。规划中的 v1 将重点优化性能,并探索调度器级掩码广播以支持混合请求批处理。

    top level view of structure decoding

    inuous effort to improve structured decoding in vLLM. References Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2016). Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473; Haugeland, J. (1997). Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4626.001.0001; Hendler, J. (2008). Avoiding Another AI Winter. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(2), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2008.20; Hochreiter,

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Answer.AI 官方研发博客

    Answer.AI 与 LightOn 发布 ModernBERT,为 BERT 提供替代方案

    Answer.AI 与 LightOn 发布 ModernBERT,一个编码器专用模型系列,提供 base(149M 参数)和 large(395M 参数)两个版本,可作为 BERT 类模型的直接替换。它把上下文长度从多数编码器的 512 提升到 8192 token,并首次在编码器训练数据中加入大量代码,在检索、自然语言理解和代码检索任务上整体优于主流模型,速度最高可达 DeBERTa 的 4 倍。模型将随 transformers v4.48.0 发布,在此之前需从 main 分支安装,官方建议搭配 Flash Attention 2 使用。

    odernBERT models, a new state-of-the-art family of small and efficient encoder-only models, finally giving BERT a much needed do-over. ModernBERT demonstrates that encoder-only models can be improved by modern methods. They continue to offer very strong performance on some tasks, providing an extremely attractive size/performance ratio. Links 🤗ModernBERT-Base; 🤗ModernBERT-Large; 📝arXiv; 🤗ModernBERT documentation page LightOn sponsored the compute for this project on Orange Business Cloud Avenue.

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Anthropic:The Institute

    Anthropic 发布 Clio:隐私保护下的 AI 使用分析工具

    Anthropic 发布自动化分析工具 Clio,可在保护用户隐私的前提下分析 claude.ai 的真实使用情况。Clio 由 Claude 完成对话特征提取、语义聚类、簇描述和层级构建,数据自动匿名化聚合,仅高层聚类对分析人员可见。对 100 万条对话的分析显示,Web 与移动应用开发类对话占比超过 10%,教学学习类超过 7%,商业策略与运营类接近 6%。Clio 还帮助识别了用相似提示词结构批量生成 SEO 垃圾内容的自动化账号网络,并发现翻译类有害内容等被原有安全分类器漏报的情况。

    Video thumbnail

    o receive your application. You can find more information about the role at this link. Edit 14 January 2025: Links to the Clio paper in this post have been updated to point to the arXiv version. Footnotes 01 For safety investigations, we also run Clio on a subset of first-party API traffic, keeping results restricted to authorized staff. Certain accounts are excluded from analysis, including trusted organizations with zero retention agreements. For more information about our policies, see Append

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. Liquid AI 模型与工程博客

    Liquid AI 发布 STAR:用进化算法自动合成神经网络架构

    Liquid AI 公布基于进化算法的架构合成方法 STAR,可将模型架构表示为分层数值序列 STAR genomes,并针对自定义任务、指标和硬件自动发现与优化架构。STAR 已合成数百种设计,在质量上超过强 Transformer 和混合架构,同时缓存和参数量更小;仅需两到三轮进化,多数架构即超越 Transformer 与强混合基线。

    rarchy. We are also interested in applying a similar methodology to other domains where modular design spaces can be constructed. For all the details refer to the paper: “STAR: Synthesis of Tailored Architectures”. Citation If you use this work, please cite the technical report: Armin W. Thomas, Rom Parnichkun, Alexander Amini, Stefano Massaroli, and Michael Poli (2024). STAR: Synthesis of Tailored Architectures. arXiv:2411.17800. Share on social: For press inquiries, email us at press@liquid.ai

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Lilian Weng:Lil'Log精选

    Lilian Weng 长文梳理强化学习中的奖励劫持

    Lilian Weng 在 Lil'Log 发布长文,系统梳理强化学习中的奖励劫持问题,即智能体利用奖励函数的缺陷或歧义获取高分却未真正完成任务。文章按 RL 任务、LLM 任务和现实生活分类列举实例,并讨论 RLHF 中代理奖励与真实奖励的差距、LLM 作为评估者的位置偏差,以及对抗奖励函数、解耦审批、异常检测等缓解思路。作者指出,随着模型能力增强,奖励劫持更易出现,而针对 RLHF 和 LLM 的实用缓解研究仍然有限。

    hacking/. Or [1] Andrew Ng & Stuart Russell. “Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning.”. ICML 2000. [2] Amodei et al. “Concrete problems in AI safety: Avoid reward hacking.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565 (2016). [3] Krakovna et al. “Specification gaming: the flip side of AI ingenuity.” 2020. [4] Langosco et al. “Goal Misgeneralization in Deep Reinforcement Learning” ICML 2022. [5] Everitt et al. “Reinforcement learning with a corrupted reward channel.” IJCAI 2017. [6] Geirhos et al. “Sho

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. The Gradient

    形状、对称性与结构:数学在机器学习研究中角色的演变

    The Gradient 文章指出,随着算力驱动的大规模训练不断带来新能力,数学在机器学习研究中的角色正从提供理论保证转向对训练与性能现象的事后解释,并更多用于架构与任务结构、数据对称性的高层设计。这一转变也让拓扑、代数、几何等“纯”数学领域加入概率论、分析与线性代数的行列。

    e IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 2023, pp. 3789–3798. [6] Phillip Pope et al. "The intrinsic dimension of images and its impact on learning". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08894 (2021). [7] Nicholas Konz and Maciej A Mazurowski. "The Effect of Intrinsic Dataset Properties on Generalization: Unraveling Learning Differences Between Natural and Medical Images". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08865 (2024). [8] Yasaman Bahri et al. "Explaining neural scaling laws". In

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. Redwood Research:Blog

    Redwood Research:自主研究型 AI 智能体的基础系统架构

    Redwood Research 提出自主做 AI R&D 研究的 AI 智能体的基础系统架构,指出推理服务器、scaffold 服务器和执行服务器几乎必然部署在逻辑上不同的计算机上。scaffold 服务器负责维护智能体状态、解析 LLM 输出并执行动作,也是插入安全机制的位置,例如在动作执行前调用可信模型判断其是否安全。

    any monitoring code you want on that API, but if they have weights access they’re by default going to be able to do whatever they want; Internal tools, e.g. Slack, wikis, internal arxiv, internal github. Like the internet, you could either access these through the scaffold or from the execution server Different ways the AI could compromise this Model weight exfiltration The simplest way to imagine something going wrong is that you gave the agent access to sensitive model weights on the execution

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Anthropic Engineering精选

    Anthropic 推出 Contextual Retrieval,将 RAG 检索失败率降低 49%

    Anthropic 提出 Contextual Retrieval 方法,通过 Contextual Embeddings 和 Contextual BM25 两项子技术,将 top-20 检索失败率降低 49%(5.7% 降至 2.9%),叠加 reranking 后降低 67%(5.7% 降至 1.9%)。该方法用 Claude 3 Haiku 为每个分块生成 50-100 token 的上下文说明,再拼接到分块前进行嵌入和建立 BM25 索引,配合 prompt caching 时生成上下文化分块的一次性成本为每百万文档 token 1.02 美元。Anthropic 同时提供了可直接部署的 cookbook。

    chunk, the one-time cost to generate contextualized chunks is $1.02 per million document tokens . Methodology We experimented across various knowledge domains (codebases, fiction, ArXiv papers, Science Papers), embedding models, retrieval strategies, and evaluation metrics. We’ve included a few examples of the questions and answers we used for each domain in Appendix II . The graphs below show the average performance across all knowledge domains with the top-performing embedding configuration (G

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. The Gradient

    LLM 聊天机器人缺失的是什么:目的性对话

    The Gradient 文章指出,LLM 聊天机器人的能力虽按月提升,但 MMLU、HumanEval、MATH 等基准日趋饱和,用户体验并未按分数比例增长。作者认为现有评测以非交互方式衡量对话系统,忽略了围绕目标展开的多轮“目的性对话”,并以旅行规划、SWE-bench 代码任务和长期记忆型个人助理为例说明其价值。

    assistant (e.g., IVA , Siri ) that, through daily interaction, learns your preferences and intentions. It can read your resources of new information automatically (e.g., twitter, arxiv, Slack, NYT) and provide you with a morning news summary according to your preferences. It can draft emails for you and keep improving by learning from your edits. In a nutshell, meaningful interactions between people rarely begin with complete strangers and conclude in just one exchange. Humans naturally interac

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Zyphra Research

    Zyphra 训练手册:如何构建 SSM、Transformer 与 MoE 混合模型

    Zyphra 发布《Zyphra Training Cookbook》,分享构建混合(SSM、Transformer、MoE)模型的工程经验,供其他技术团队参考。Zyphra 已构建 BlackMamba、Zamba-7B、Zamba2-2.7B、Zamba2-1.2B 等混合模型,以及 Zyda 数据集和 Tree Attention 工程优化。手册聚焦 1B-15B 端侧小模型,建议每 1/4 到 1/6 的序列混合层使用全注意力,其余采用 Mamba 等线性混合器以降低 FLOP 和内存开销。

    art but we find that documents containing fact-rich information to be the most performant. Examples include: Instruction following, which was particularly effective; Wikipedia and arxiv papers; Synthetic fact-enhanced textbook style data such as cosmopedia In terms of the amount of annealing data, we find in general that more is better, although we are generally constrained by amount of available annealing data so that we have not been able to test truly large ( 200B tokens) amounts of such data

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Zyphra Research

    Zyphra 解析基于图的 RAG 与多跳问答

    Zyphra 用数学解释为何图数据库适合多跳问答,并实现了一个简单图数据库来增强 GPT-4o。该系统在针尖寻针数据集 Babilong 上取得非微调模型中的最佳表现,超过前沿长上下文模型。

    n Retrieval, 17(5), 457-586. [2] Gutiérrez, B. J., Shu, Y., Gu, Y., Yasunaga, M., & Su, Y. (2024). HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14831. [3] Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Yong, L., & Huang, S. (2024, June). End-to-End Beam Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Zyphra Research

    Zephra 解析边缘 LLM:优势、挑战与解决方案

    Zephra 发文讨论在 iPhone 15 Pro 和 NVIDIA Jetson Orin 等边缘设备上部署大语言模型的关键因素,指出内存带宽是核心瓶颈,并提出量化、低秩适配器和实时参数卸载等技术来高效利用本地硬件。其 Zamba 系列模型采用参数共享设计,以降低内存占用和生成下一个 token 所需的 FLOP,从而降低延迟、提升吞吐。

    rs which we believe will unlock significant utility. Citations [1] Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke Zettlemoyer, “QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14314v1 [cs.LG], May 2023 (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14314) [2] Paolo Glorioso, Quentin Anthony, Yury Tokpanov, James Whittington, Jonathan Pilault, Adam Ibrahim, Beren Millidge, “Zamba: A Compact 7B SSM Hybrid Model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16712v1 [cs.LG], May 2024 (https://arxiv.org/pdf

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. FutureHouse Research

    LAB-Bench:衡量语言模型生物学研究能力的基准

    FutureHouse 发布 Language Agent Biology Benchmark(LAB-Bench),共 2,457 道题、覆盖 8 大类,用于评测语言模型和语言智能体执行科研任务的能力。所有现有模型在各项任务上均大幅落后于人类,仅 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 在 TableQA 精度上略超人类;除它之外,所有模型在视觉推理基准 FigQA 上接近随机水平。数据集已开放 80%,另留 20% 私有测试集用于监测训练污染。

    als@futurehouse.org or see our open roles here . Likewise, if you have ideas for evaluations we should build or would like to work with us to leverage our pipeline to build specific evaluations, please get in touch at evals@futurehouse.org . We are grateful to OpenPhilanthropy, whose generous support for our evaluation work made this work possible. In addition, we are grateful to Eric and Wendy Schmidt for supporting our research. ‍ Access the paper on ArXiv: LINK Download the pdf directly: LINK

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Prime Intellect

    Prime Intellect 开源 OpenDiLoCo,实现跨洲分布式低通信训练

    Prime Intellect 开源 OpenDiLoCo,这是 DeepMind DiLoCo 低通信分布式训练方法的可复现实现,代码基于 Hivemind 与 PyTorch FSDP,已发布在 GitHub。团队在加拿大、芬兰和美国两地共四个 DiLoCo worker(各 8 张 H100)上训练 1.1B 参数模型,跨两大洲三国,计算利用率保持 90-95%,all-reduce 仅占训练时间 6.9%。相比原论文 400M 参数规模,该方法被扩展到 1.1B 参数,并验证伪梯度可用 FP16 all-reduce 而不损失性能。

    OpenDiLoCo: An Open-Source Framework for Globally Distributed Low-Communication Training

    efficiency. We also demonstrated that DiLoCo pseudo gradients can be effectively all-reduced in FP16 without any performance degradation. For more details, check out the paper on arXiv. The original DiLoCo paper by DeepMind only experimented with model sizes of up to 400 million parameters. In our work, we scale the method to a model with 1.1 billion parameters. We adopt the same hyperparameters as TinyLlama and use a total batch size containing 8 million tokens (batch size of 8192 with sequenc

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. Lilian Weng:Lil'Log

    LLM 的外源性幻觉:成因与评估 | Lil'Log

    Lilian Weng 在 Lil'Log 撰文分析 LLM 的外源性幻觉,即模型输出无法被预训练数据所支撑。文章指出预训练数据过时、缺失或错误,以及微调阶段引入新知识都会诱发幻觉;Gekhman et al. 2024 发现模型学习含新知识的微调样本更慢,一旦学会便更易产生幻觉。文中还介绍了 FactualityPrompt、FActScore 等幻觉评估方法。

    et al. “Survey of hallucination in natural language generation.” ACM Computing Surveys (2022) [2] Gekhman et al. “Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05904 (2024). [3] Min et al. “FActScore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation.” EMNLP 2023. [4] Wei et al. 2024 “Long-form Factuality in LLMs” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18802 (2024). [5] Chern et al. “FacTool: Factuality detection in generative AI -

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Zyphra Research

    Zyphra 提出结合链式表格搜索与向量检索的 RAG 智能体,应对对话长期记忆中的时间与歧义查询

    Zyphra 针对长对话 RAG 中时间/事件查询和歧义查询两大难题,基于 LoCoMo 数据集构建了包含时间类、歧义时间类和元数据+内容类问题的新数据集,并发现标准 RAG 方法表现不佳。其新检索模型结合 Chain-of-Table 表格搜索、向量数据库检索和查询改写提示,在这些任务上大幅超越现有方法。

    e in conversational contexts. We believe our dataset can be used as a basis to test how well various IR methods understand temporal and conversational context, and our empirical results suggest that our approach that combines chain-of-table and semantic retrieval methods makes a useful starting point. References [^1]: Maharana, A., Lee, D. H., Tulyakov, S., Bansal, M., Barbieri, F., & Fang, Y. (2024). Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17753.

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. The Gradient

    文本嵌入能否完美编码文本?

    The Gradient 文章讨论文本嵌入能否被逆向还原为原文,并引用 EMNLP 2023 论文《Text Embeddings Reveal As Much as Text》。作者用 32 token 输入、768 维嵌入做实验,训练 Transformer 从嵌入还原文本,BLEU 约 30/100,精确匹配接近零。

    rting embeddings from other modalities as well as to approaches more general than embedding inversion. Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networks (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02753 Understanding Invariance via Feedforward Inversion of Discriminatively Trained Classifiers (2021), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/teterwak21a/teterwak21a.pdf Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Text (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06816 Language Model Inversion (2024), https://arx

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Vapi Blog

    Sora、马尔可夫链与 AI 焦虑(上)

    Vapi 博客文章借 OpenAI Sora 发布引发的恐慌,逐一回应 ChatGPT 列出的八条“人类害怕 AI”的理由,上篇讨论失业与控制权丧失。文章指出 Sora 本质是结合 Transformer 架构的扩散模型,扩散模型 2015 年由斯坦福研究者提出、Transformer 2017 年由 Google 研究者提出,生成式 AI 的基础技术已存在数十年,真正变化的是可生成对象的复杂度和训练规模。

    regarding the difficulty in coming up with a single test or theory to determine consciousness. This idea was given a thorough treatment last year in a paper published on Cornell’s arXiv co-authored by 19 prominent computer scientists, neuroscientists, and philosophers. They propose 14 criteria that can be applied to existing AI architectures to evaluate consciousness. However, the authors are clear that this framework can suggest but not prove. Adeel Razi, a Canadian computational neuroscientist

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Lilian Weng:Lil'Log

    Lilian Weng 谈高质量人类数据:众包标注与评分者一致性

    Lilian Weng 在 Lil'Log 撰文讨论高质量人类数据对深度学习训练的价值,指出数据收集涉及任务设计、评分者筛选训练与数据聚合三个环节。文章回顾 1907 年 Nature 的“Vox populi”牛体重竞猜,以及 Callison-Burch 2009 年用 Amazon Mechanical Turk 做机器翻译非专家评估的研究,并介绍多数投票、Cohen's Kappa、MACE 等评分者一致性度量方法。

    nd Dialogue Content for Safety” 2023. [8] Zhang et al. “A Taxonomy of Rater Disagreements: Surveying Challenges & Opportunities from the Perspective of Annotating Online Toxicity” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04345 (2023). [9] Davani et al. “Dealing with disagreements: Looking beyond the majority vote in subjective annotations” ACL 2022. [10] Gordon et al. “Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models” CHI 2022. [11] Gordon et al. “The Disagreement Deconvolution: Bringi

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. FutureHouse Research精选

    FutureHouse 发布 WikiCrow:自动为 15616 个人类蛋白编码基因生成维基式条目

    FutureHouse 发布 WikiCrow,一个基于其 PaperQA 智能体平台的自动合成系统,可为技术主题生成带引用的维基百科式摘要。团队用它为 15616 个尚无条目或仅有残篇的人类蛋白编码基因生成草稿,每篇约 8 分钟,50 个实例并行,几天内完成,估计人工需约 60000 小时。评测显示 WikiCrow 约 9% 的陈述不正确,但引用来源的一致性明显优于人类编辑;PaperQA 在 PubMedQA Blind、MedQA-USMLE 及自建 LitQA 基准上优于 GPT-4、Perplexity 等系统。

    ool; it is an adaptive system that uses tools based on the question and intermediate research. These tools include: SEARCH : finding relevant papers from online databases, such as Arxiv and Pubmed; GATHER EVIDENCE : parsing and summarizing text from these papers; ANSWER QUESTION : ranking the relevance of the gathered context and synthesizing information into a final answer. This process is non-linear. For example, if PaperQA sees a paper that uses a different word to refer to a concept, it can

    匹配字段正文