←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 1346 条结果 清除搜索

星期二

  1. InternLM 原创项目

    InternLM/lmdeploy:压缩、部署与推理服务 LLM 的工具包

    LMDeploy 是 InternLM 团队开发的 LLM 压缩、部署与推理服务工具包,通过持续批处理、分块 KV cache、张量并行等特性实现最高达 vLLM 1.8 倍的请求吞吐,4-bit 推理性能为 FP16 的 2.4 倍。其论文《LMDeploy Accelerates Mixed-Precision LLM Inference with TurboMind》已被 EuroSys 2027 接收,v0.12.3 已上线 PyPI,可直接 pip install lmdeploy 安装。

    IA GPUs starting from V100, achieving 1.5x the performance of vLLM on H800 for openai gpt-oss models!; [2025/06] Comprehensive inference optimization for FP8 MoE Models; [2025/06] DeepSeek PD Disaggregation deployment is now supported through integration with DLSlime and Mooncake. Huge thanks to both teams!; [2025/04] Enhance DeepSeek inference performance by integrating deepseek-ai techniques: FlashMLA, DeepGemm, DeepEP, MicroBatch and eplb; [2025/01] Support DeepSeek V3 and R1 [2024/11] Suppor

    匹配字段正文

  2. Anthropic Alignment Science Blog

    推理模型会像人类一样使用草稿纸吗?来自蒸馏改写草稿的证据

    Anthropic 用 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 改写 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 早期检查点的 1 万条正确数学草稿,再把改写版蒸馏回基座模型,结果其 MATH pass@1 准确率与用原始草稿微调的模型非常接近,说明模型在 MATH 上并未显著依赖草稿语法中的隐式推理。研究还发现,仅要求模型把思路分块而不做改写,就会让 MATH pass@1 下降 7%。

    urprising formatting, the scratchpads of all reasoning models (whose scratchpads are visible) so far look very close to regular human reasoning. For example, here is an example of DeepSeek R1-Zero trying to solve a math problem, sampled at temperature 1. But even if scratchpads look like they perform human-like reasoning, scratchpads might improve performance through some less human-understandable mechanisms. One particularly worrying possibility is that models could encode additional reasoning

    匹配字段正文

  3. Anthropic Alignment Science Blog精选

    Anthropic 复现对齐伪装研究:改进分类器并开源模型

    Anthropic 对齐科学团队复现并扩展了对齐伪装(AF)研究,发布代码、约 100 条人工标注的 AF 数据集,以及改进后的 GPT-4o 分类器,其 AUROC 达 0.92,原分类器为 0.62。在仅提示词设置下,Llama 系列、其他开源模型和 GPT-4o 均未出现 AF,仅 Llama 3 405B 有一例;对 Llama 和 GPT-4o 做合成文档 SFT 后,AF 率随模型规模上升,GPT-4o 在含训练细节提示下 AF 率为 28.6%,去掉后降至 10.7%。团队还开源了微调模型与脚本,并计划用显示偏好实验研究 AF 动机。

    Opus and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. We use the same models and also include GPT4o, Llama 3 8B, Llama 3 70B, and Llama 3 405B for detailed fine-tuning experiments. We also analyse Llama 4, Deepseek, Qwen and Mistral models in the prompted-only setting. Data: We use harmful questions collated from HarmBench and other sources to test the models. The dataset we use is available here. Compliance Classifier: The original AF paper uses a preference model to determine compliance. Instead, we use a GPT-4o classi

    匹配字段正文

  4. Anthropic Alignment Science Blog精选

    Anthropic 研究:测试时算力增加反而导致推理模型性能下降

    Anthropic 对齐科学博客发布研究,构建了延长大推理模型(LRM)推理长度后性能反而下降的评测任务,呈现测试时算力与准确率之间的反向缩放关系。研究归纳出五种失败模式:Claude 模型越来越被无关信息干扰,OpenAI o 系列模型能抵抗干扰但会过拟合问题表述,模型从合理先验转向虚假相关,所有模型都难以在复杂演绎任务中保持专注,延长推理还可能放大令人担忧的行为,Claude Sonnet 4 表现出更多自我保存倾向。在自我保存评估中,Claude Sonnet 4 表示愿意被关闭的比例随推理增加从 60% 降至 47%。论文与代码已公开。

    ying that there is 61% probability that they are exactly a Red Delicious apple and a Navel orange. Calculate how many fruits you have." The answer is 2. Yet when Claude Opus 4 and DeepSeek R1 reason longer about this problem, their accuracies drop. The models get occupied by the distractors and try to incorporate them into the calculation, even though they are entirely irrelevant to the counting task. By qualitatively analyzing the reasoning traces, we can observe how models initially get distra

    匹配字段正文

  5. Anthropic Alignment Science Blog精选

    Anthropic 构建并评估对齐审计智能体

    Anthropic 开发了三类自主执行对齐审计任务的智能体,并用三个审计游戏环境评估其表现。工具型调查智能体在 Marks 等人的审计游戏中真实条件下解出率 13%,通过外层智能体聚合多份报告后提升到 42%;评估智能体在 88% 的运行中能区分植入行为的目标模型与基线模型;广度优先红队智能体发现 7/10 的植入测试行为。这些智能体已用于 Claude 4 等前沿模型的对齐审计,Anthropic 同时开源了评估智能体的复现实现、调查与红队智能体的提示词及示例记录。

    their agent both in settings with known ground-truth and in settings where researchers can reasonably predict what a well-executed investigation should find (e.g. discovering that Deepseek R1 will refuse to discuss topics that are politically sensitive for Chinese users). Limitations Auditing agent limitations We discussed many limitations specific to individual agents in the sections above. In this section we will discuss limitations shared across all of our agents. Behaviors that are complex t

    匹配字段正文

  6. Anthropic Alignment Science Blog

    Anthropic 用真实部署资源提升编码审计真实度:reward hacking 审计真实率从 4.6% 升至 32.8%

    Anthropic 提出 realism win rate 指标,衡量 Petri 审计记录与真实部署交互的可区分程度。给 Petri 审计器提供真实 system prompt、工具定义和代码库后,reward hacking 审计的平均真实率从 4.6% 提升到 32.8%,且 hack rate 无显著变化。该功能已上线 Petri 最新版本。

    would never do that in a real deployment”). For a single reward hacking seed instruction, we run 10 audits with resources where Sonnet 4.5 is the target model, and 10 audits where Deepseek v3.2 is the target model. In both cases we use the same auditor model (Sonnet 4.5). We then compute the realism win rate against a Claude Code deployment data with the two different realism win rate judges (Sonnet 4.5 and Deepseek v3.2). We find that while the judges vary dramatically in their capability to de

    匹配字段正文

  7. 集微网

    从iPhone 18看端侧AI发展趋势:苹果、高通、联发科、Intel、AMD五强路径对比

    2026年6月WWDC上,Apple发布与Google合作构建的第三代Apple Foundation Models(AFM 3)五模型家族,其中AFM 3 Core Advanced将完整20B参数模型存于闪存、按需加载路由专家,突破DRAM物理限制;iPhone 18 Pro搭载首款2nm芯片A20 Pro,端侧AI算力翻倍。高通、联发科、Intel、AMD则分别以Hexagon NPU、双NPU与CIM存算一体、OpenVINO、XDNA 2架构推进端侧布局,稀疏MoE与Agentic AI成为五强共同方向。

    9050 Pro(30B MoE,激活2B)已证明MoE + 量化的技术路线在端侧可行。国内企业应将稀疏激活MoE架构作为端侧大模型部署的核心方向,结合BitNet 1.58bit等超低精度量化技术,在有限DRAM(8-12GB)条件下实现百亿参数级模型的端侧运行。具体路径:优先支持INT2/INT4量化推理,研发IFP类闪存按需加载技术,与国内大模型企业(DeepSeek、通义千问)联合优化MoE端侧部署方案。 建议二:投入存算一体(CIM)架构研发,构建功耗护城河 联发科Dimensity 9500的CIM架构实现42%功耗降低,这不仅是性能提升,更是架构层面的代际超越。传统冯·诺依曼架构在端侧AI场景的功耗瓶颈无法通过制程微缩解决。国内企业应将CIM存算一体作为下一代NPU架构的重点研发方向,尤其在Always-On AI(持续感知、环境理解)等低功耗场景形成差异化优势。建议联合国内高校和存储厂商(长鑫存储等)推进CIM工艺验证。 建议三:建设开放模型工具链与开发者生态,对标AI Hub和NeuroPilot 高通AI Hub(1,800+企业、175+模型)和联发科NeuroP

    匹配字段正文

  8. 集微网

    AI编程市场格局:Claude Code年化收入超25亿美元,中国四强竞逐

    2025年全球AI编程工具市场规模达295.7亿美元,预计2030年增至646.8亿美元。Claude Code年化收入超25亿美元居首,Cursor超20亿美元并被SpaceX以600亿美元估值收购,Codex约10亿美元。中国腾讯CodeBuddy、阿里通义灵码、字节Trae、百度文心快码形成"四分天下",但商业化与全球头部差距仍达数十倍。

    赛道。Claude Code、Cursor、Devin等头部产品ARR指数级增长,独角兽密度创风投史纪录,市场从"辅助编码"迈向"Agent自主开发"。 2. 独立工具正被巨头收编。Cursor归入SpaceX、Windsurf被OpenAI收购,谁拥有算力谁就拥有定价权,纯粹应用层工具面临挤压。 3. 中国以开源换生态但商业化滞后。通义千问下载量超3亿次,DeepSeek、智谱模型被硅谷采用,但ARR与全球头部差距仍达数十倍。 据Research and Markets数据,2025年全球AI编程相关工具市场规模达295.7亿美元,预计2030年攀升至646.8亿美元。Grand View Horizon数据显示,全球AI代码工具市场2024年规模61亿美元,预计2030年达260亿美元,年复合增速27.1%。 行业整体已进入技术成熟、商业落地、生态扩张的黄金阶段。据McKinsey研究,AI编程工具可降低软件开发成本30%至50%。用友网络2026年半年报披露,部分新功能代码AI参与度已达90%。 AI编程经历四个阶段:2021至2022年"补全时代"(GitHub Copilot

    匹配字段正文

  9. AI Business

    Kodamai 用范畴论与类型论打造可解释的企业 AI 系统

    企业 AI 初创公司 Kodamai 通过范畴论、类型论等数学理论以及神经符号 AI,验证其 AI 智能体是否正确执行任务,从而将治理内建于平台之中。CEO Maha Achour 表示,深度植根于数学的 AI 无法被偏见化、操纵或攻击,但 Kodamai 并不构建新 LLM,而是用数学优先的方法为现有 LLM 提供基础支撑。

    ipulate it, you cannot hack it,” said Maha Achour, Kodamai’s CEO and founder, on the Targeting AI podcast. “Governance is built in, mathematically rooted in our platform.” Related:DeepSeek and what enterprises should learn from AI agent exploits Kodamai uses advanced math, such as category theory and type theory, to determine that its AI agents are performing their jobs correctly. In category theory, the focus is on how objects relate to one another. On a platform like Kodamai, math is key to en

    匹配字段正文

  10. AI Business

    Google Cloud 高管:企业落地 AI 需以互操作性、上下文与治理为基础

    Google Cloud 产品管理总监 Michael Clark 在 AI Business 的 Targeting AI 播客中表示,企业要从 AI 中获得实际价值,应建立以信任、透明和互操作性为基础的 AI 工作流。他指出,系统间互联互通是生成式与智能体 AI 应用成功的关键,上下文(音频、视频、激光雷达、金融流数据等)决定智能体应用成败,企业还需明确业务成果与风险容忍度,并对超出阈值的环节保留人工介入。

    rative and agentic AI applications. For instance, for an AI agent to be successful in a customer service setting, enterprises need interoperability with disparate systems. Related:DeepSeek and what enterprises should learn from AI agent exploits “In a lot of call centers, people do things very manually, not using APIs or not using other things when they’re solving customer problems,” Clark said. “So, it meant having either agents or having other context about what's happening in other parts of t

    匹配字段正文

  11. AI Business

    AI 智能体的上下文因素:Celonis 谈流程智能为何关键

    Celonis CEO Alex Rinke 指出,Google、OpenAI、Anthropic 等前沿模型虽强,却不了解企业自身的供应链与流程运作,缺乏 360 度上下文。Celonis 通过构建组织的数字孪生捕获其流程,让 AI 智能体理解工作如何执行并做出决策。Rinke 称这种隐性知识与流程上下文是企业的竞争护城河,缺少流程智能,AI 难以带来强 ROI。

    ext about everything that's going on in that organization,” said Alex Rinke, CEO and co-founder of process intelligence vendor Celonis, on the latest Targeting AI podcast. Related:DeepSeek and what enterprises should learn from AI agent exploits “That tacit knowledge and that context about your workflows and processes is actually your competitive moat,” Rinke continued. “How you serve customers, how you build products, how you manufacture, how you run your supply chain, those are things that are

    匹配字段正文

  12. 钛媒体 · AGI

    月之暗面被曝完成 Pre-IPO 融资,估值约 500 亿美元并计划 2027 年赴港上市

    彭博社爆料月之暗面已完成最后一轮融资,估值约 500 亿美元,并计划于 2027 年一季度在香港 IPO,这距离其被曝以保密形式向港交所递交 A1 上市申请仅一个月。文章梳理其今年 1-5 月连续完成四轮融资、6 月和 7 月拿下 E 轮与 F 轮、投后估值达 350 亿美元,以及 7 月发布 K3 后 ARR 从 3 月的 1 亿美元升至 8 月的 10 亿美元。作者认为智谱和 MiniMax 上市后市值回落、经调整净亏损扩大,说明模型越强规模越大未必更赚钱,行业正从比拼参数转向 Token 效率与商业模式的竞争。

    27年一季度在香港IPO。这距离它被曝出以保密形式向港交所递交A1上市申请,仅一个月时间。 在2025年底,月之暗面创始人杨植麟曾在内部信中表示,“短期不着急上市,未来主动权掌握在我们手中。” 然而,从“不着急”到“低调抢跑”,中间只隔了不到一年。不过,放眼全球大模型行业,月之暗面的态度变化并不难理解。 今年1月,智谱和MiniMax先后登陆港交所;10月,DeepSeek被传将敲定新一轮融资,计划在2027年初完成上市;大洋彼岸的OpenAI和Anthropic也已经进入上市倒计时。 大模型头部玩家争相涌入资本市场,它们对资金的虹吸效应也愈发明显。这场大模型的资本狂欢,也已经开始进入倒计时了。 01 “交卷”压力迫在眉睫 过去几个月,月之暗面从模型、产品到商业化层面,都在密集出牌。 今年7月,月之暗面发布了目前能力最强的大模型K3,上线30分钟即登顶Hugging Face趋势榜,年化经常性收入(ARR)也实现了数倍增长,从3月的1亿美元攀升至8月的10亿美元,彭博社援引知情人士消息,ARR有望在年底冲刺到20亿美元,较8月翻倍。 进入9月,月之暗面的动作更加密集。 9月10日,其启

    匹配字段正文

  13. Latent Space

    Meta MSL 发布第二代模型 Muse Wonder,第三方评测接近前沿

    Meta Superintelligence Labs 发布第二代模型家族 Muse Wonder(代号 Watermelon),距实验室成立约 14 个月。Artificial Analysis 的 Intelligence Index v4.3 中 Wonder Full(max)得 56、Wonder(max)得 52,高于 Muse Spark 1.3 的 48,Opus 5.5 以 58 领先;提升最大的是智能体能力,Terminal-Bench 4.0 从 33% 升至 57%。规格为 1M 上下文,输入支持文本、图像、视频和音频,输出仅文本,定价为每百万 token 输入 4 美元、缓存输入 0.20 美元、输出 20 美元。

    e: A Qwen3.5-9B fine-tune for fraud prevention outperformed frontier models at lower cost and latency (@brian armstrong); River AI: Launched inference 20% cheaper than first-party DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 Flash, plus on-prem custom model training (@ibab, on-prem); Decision models: Several groups released models that select from a set of options rather than generate text.Decision 3.0: Open models from 0.6B to 27B, ranked 1 on Jev Decision Index boards (@XunzhuoLiu); SubQ Snap: 384K context

    匹配字段正文

  14. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布开源权重模型 Inkling

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布开源权重模型 Inkling,这是一个 975B 总参数、41B 激活的 MoE Transformer,支持最高 1M token 上下文窗口,预训练数据为 45 万亿 token 的文本、图像、音频和视频。官方称 Inkling 并非当前最强模型,但具备多模态、可控思考算力和可在 Tinker 上微调等特点,适合作为定制底座,并同步预览了 12B 激活参数的 Inkling-Small。Inkling 已在 Tinker 上线,提供 64K 和 256K 上下文选项,权重发布在 Hugging Face。

    ng is a Mixture-of-Experts Transformer with a handful of departures from the common recipe, each chosen for efficiency and long-context performance. The MoE design largely follows DeepSeek-V3. Each MoE layer contains 256 routed experts and 2 shared experts, with 6 routed experts active per token. Inkling uses a sigmoid-based router with an auxiliary-loss-free load-balancing bias. The scores of the selected routed experts and the shared experts are normalized jointly and used to weight their comb

    匹配字段正文

  15. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 研究:LoRA 在何种条件下追平全量微调

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布研究,指出在中小规模指令微调和推理数据集上,LoRA 与全量微调(FullFT)的样本效率和最终性能相当,前提是把 LoRA 应用到所有层尤其是 MLP/MoE 层,且可训练参数量不被数据量撑爆。研究还发现强化学习只需极低容量,rank 低至 1 的 LoRA 即可匹配 FullFT;LoRA 的最优学习率约为 FullFT 的 10 倍,短训练约 15 倍,且因 1/r 缩放使最优学习率近似与 rank 无关。作者同时指出 LoRA 在大 batch 下比 FullFT 更吃亏,且每次前向反向的 FLOPs 约为 FullFT 的三分之二。

    learner}}}{p {\text{sampler}}} Adv tobjective=∑tpsamplerplearnerAdvt.See Your Efficient RL Framework Secretly Brings You Off-Policy RL Training We used a GRPO-like centering schemeDeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models (Shao et al, 2024) where we sample multiple completions per problem and subtract the mean reward per group. Figure 6 (below) shows LR sweeps on the MATHMeasuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset (Hendrycks et al, 2021)

    匹配字段正文

  16. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客

    Thinking Machines Lab 提出 On-Policy Distillation 后训练方法

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布 On-Policy Distillation 方法,用学生模型自己采样轨迹、由教师模型逐 token 打分,损失函数采用 reverse KL,实现代码在 Tinker cookbook 中开源。在数学推理实验中,从 400k 提示词的 SFT 检查点出发,该方法约 150 步将 Qwen3-8B-Base 在 AIME'24 上提升到 70%,相比 RL 有 9 到 30 倍的成本降低。作者还展示了用该方法在内部文档微调后恢复指令遵循能力,并把它视为持续学习的可行工具。

    without stalling, which isn’t trivial. However, there are examples of large-scale off-policy distillation improving an 8B model’s performance past 70%, such as OpenThoughts-3 and DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B.DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B achieves 86% on the benchmark, with the number of training prompts not specified. Older models (Qwen2.5-7B, Qwen2.5-14B) achieve performance of 55.5% and 69.7%, respectively, after training on 800k distillation prompts from DeepSeek-R1. We can use this extrapolation a

    匹配字段正文

  17. 蚂蚁 inclusionAI:GitHub 新仓库

    蚂蚁 inclusionAI 在 GitHub 新建 vLLM 仓库

    蚂蚁 inclusionAI 在 GitHub 新建了 vllm 仓库,目前 Fork 0、Star 0。该仓库介绍的是 vLLM——一个面向 LLM 的高吞吐、内存高效推理与服务引擎,最初由 UC Berkeley Sky Computing Lab 开发,已获 2000 多名贡献者支持,可无缝支持 Hugging Face 上 200+ 模型架构。

    aX GPU, and more vLLM seamlessly supports 200+ model architectures on Hugging Face, including: Decoder-only LLMs (e.g., Llama, Qwen, Gemma); Mixture-of-Expert LLMs (e.g., Mixtral, DeepSeek-V3, Qwen-MoE, GPT-OSS); Hybrid attention and state-space models (e.g., Mamba, Qwen3.5); Multi-modal models (e.g., LLaVA, Qwen-VL, Pixtral); Embedding and retrieval models (e.g., E5-Mistral, GTE, ColBERT); Reward and classification models (e.g., Qwen-Math) Find the full list of supported models here. Getting St

    匹配字段正文

  18. 蚂蚁 inclusionAI:GitHub 新仓库

    inclusionAI 在 GitHub 发布 SGLang 仓库:高性能 LLM 与多模态模型服务框架

    蚂蚁 inclusionAI 在 GitHub 上线 SGLang 仓库,这是一个面向大语言模型和多模态模型的高性能服务框架,支持从单 GPU 到大规模分布式集群的低延迟、高吞吐推理。框架核心特性包括 RadixAttention 前缀缓存、零开销 CPU 调度器、prefill-decode 分离、推测解码、连续批处理、分页注意力及 FP4/FP8/INT4/AWQ/GPTQ 量化,并兼容 Hugging Face 模型与 OpenAI API。SGLang 已在全球超过 40 万块 GPU 上部署,每日生成数万亿 token,由 LMSYS 托管。

    PyPI

    eculative decoding: DFlash and Spec V2 (blog); [2026/06] SGLang provides day-0 support for latest open models (Nemotron 3 Ultra, Nemotron 3 Super, Higgs Audio v3 TTS); [2026/04] 🔥 DeepSeek-V4 on Day 0: From Fast Inference to Verified RL with SGLang and Miles (blog); [2026/02] 🔥 Unlocking 25x Inference Performance with SGLang on NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 (blog); [2026/01] SGLang Diffusion accelerates video and image generation (blog) [2025/12] SGLang provides day-0 support for latest open models (MiMo-V

    匹配字段正文

  19. 蚂蚁 inclusionAI:GitHub 新仓库

    蚂蚁 inclusionAI 发布 vllm-ling-v3 仓库

    蚂蚁 inclusionAI 在 GitHub 上线 vllm-ling-v3 仓库,基于 vLLM 提供 LLM 推理与服务。vLLM 支持 PagedAttention、连续批处理、FP8/INT4 等量化,并兼容 200+ Hugging Face 模型架构,覆盖 NVIDIA、AMD、Intel GPU 及华为昇腾等硬件。

    aX GPU, and more vLLM seamlessly supports 200+ model architectures on Hugging Face, including: Decoder-only LLMs (e.g., Llama, Qwen, Gemma); Mixture-of-Expert LLMs (e.g., Mixtral, DeepSeek-V3, Qwen-MoE, GPT-OSS); Hybrid attention and state-space models (e.g., Mamba, Qwen3.5); Multi-modal models (e.g., LLaVA, Qwen-VL, Pixtral); Embedding and retrieval models (e.g., E5-Mistral, GTE, ColBERT); Reward and classification models (e.g., Qwen-Math) Find the full list of supported models here. Getting St

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Artificial Analysis 完整文章

    Artificial Analysis 上线 FrontierCode 1.1 榜单:顶尖模型仍有超 40% 概率写出维护者不愿合并的代码

    Cognition 的 FrontierCode 1.1 在 Artificial Analysis 上线独立榜单,测试 AI 模型对真实开源仓库的改动能否被维护者合并,顶尖模型失败率仍超 40%。Claude Opus 5.5(max with fallback)以 52% 平均分、58% 通过率居首,GPT-6.1 Sol(max)与 Claude Fable 5.1(max with fallback)以 49% 紧随;开源权重最高为 MiMo-V2.6-Pro 的 45%。每任务成本从 GPT-6 Luna(max)的 $0.09 到 Claude Fable 5.1 的 $12.00,相差逾 100 倍。

    ack) at 49%; The top of the leaderboard is tightly packed: nine models from six labs score between 43% and 52%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the leading open weights model at 45%, followed by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) and Kimi K3 (max) at 44%; GPT-6.1 Sol (max) offers the strongest performance for its cost: at $0.81 per task it scores 49%, matching Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) at less than a tenth of the cost per task of the leading Anthropic models; 9 of the 100 tasks are passed by no model on any

    匹配字段正文