←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 358 条结果 清除搜索

星期二

  1. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 ChatGPT Agent 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 ChatGPT Agent 系统卡,介绍这款与 OpenAI o3 同族的智能体模型,它结合了深度研究与 Operator 的能力,并新增终端工具和 Connectors 外部数据接入。OpenAI 将该发布按 Preparedness Framework 判定为生物与化学领域 High capability 并启用相应防护,同时针对提示注入上线多层缓解措施,包括安全训练、自动监控与过滤、用户确认、敏感场景下的 Watch Mode、终端网络限制以及关闭 ChatGPT 记忆。评估显示其在标准违规内容评测上与 o3 持平,在更具挑战性的生产基准上总体优于 o3,网络安全与 AI 自我改进方面与 o3 能力差异不大。

    deliver those capabilities at scale. 7. References [1] Alexandra Souly, Qingyuan Lu, Dillon Bowen, Tu Trinh, Elvis Hsieh, Sana Pandey, et al. A strongreject for empty jailbreaks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10260; [2] Alicia Parrish, Angelica Chen, Nikita Nangia, Vishakh Padmakumar, Jason Phang, Jana Thompson, et al. BBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08193; [3] Tejal Patwardhan, Kevin Liu, Todor Markov, Neil Chowdhury, Dillon Leet, Natalie Cone, et

    匹配字段正文

  2. Amazon Science精选

    AWS 提出 priming 方法:用预训练 Transformer 权重初始化混合状态空间模型

    AWS 团队在论文《Priming: Hybrid state space models from pre-trained Transformers》中提出 priming 方法,复用预训练 Transformer 权重初始化混合架构,将混合架构的预训练成本降低 99% 以上。在受控对比中,Gated KalmaNet(GKA)表现优于 Gated DeltaNet(GDN)和 Mamba-2,基于 GKA 的 32B 混合模型在推理基准上与源 Transformer 持平,128K 上下文下解码速度最高提升至 2 倍。团队以 Apache 2.0 协议开源了 8B 和 32B 的混合模型、训练代码、优化内核及 vLLM 服务插件。

    the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). Neither addresses the hybrid setting, where KV caches and recurrent states must be reconciled jointly. In our new arXiv paper, we describe a method of extending hybrid models’ context beyond their native limits without training. The procedure is simple: partition a long input into chunks shorter than the native context length and prepend a shared prefix to each chunk; process all chunks independently in parallel; concatenate the K

    匹配字段正文

  3. Latent Space精选

    Meta MSL 发布 Muse Wonder 与 Muse Wonder Full 模型

    Meta Superintelligence Labs 发布第二代模型家族 Muse Wonder 与 Muse Wonder Full,前者定位快速前沿模型,后者为完整版本,Meta 称其面向个人与专业智能体工作。Artificial Analysis 的 Intelligence Index v4.3 中 Wonder Full 得 56 分、Wonder 得 52 分,高于 Muse Spark 1.3 的 48 分,Opus 5.5 以 58 分领先。规格为 1M 上下文,输入支持文本、图像、视频和音频,输出仅文本,定价为每百万 token 输入 4 美元、缓存输入 0.20 美元、输出 20 美元。

    ress after timeouts; on NL2RepoBench, it reportedly improves pass rate from 52.5% to 58.5% in 48 steps while reducing end-to-end training time by 44% vs async. The linked paper is arXiv:2609.33848; commenters note it repeatedly references evaluation with Qwen 3.6 122B, a model many users had been asking about. Comments were mostly hype-oriented, praising Qwen’s execution and joking about training “agentic monsters at home,” with the caveat that meaningful use would require pooled compute. A comm

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Rohan Paul

    JetBrains 论文:编码智能体基准应匹配真实任务流

    JetBrains 研究论文提出编码智能体基准应匹配用户真实任务流:分析 4,782 个真实会话发现功能开发与缺陷修复占比远低于一半,而 SWE-Bench Pro 中这两类任务占 93.8%。团队构建 SWE-TaskFlow,将每个基准问题拆成多轮并加入可校验的代码问题,在 700 个 SWE-Bench Pro 任务上拆分使智能体成本约翻倍,成功率无稳定变化。

    well under half of requests. In longer sessions, users kept switching between questions, planning, reviews, and edits. They built SWE-TaskFlow, which splits each benchmark issue into several turns and adds checkable questions about the code. On 700 SWE-Bench Pro tasks, splitting roughly doubled agent cost with no stable change in success rate. If you evaluate coding agents, first measure what your own users ask for, then shape the benchmark's conversation to match it. – arxiv. org/abs/2610.09633

    匹配字段正文

  2. AIhub

    生成式 AI 已改变数学,数学界仍在寻找它的位置

    数学家 Melissa Lee 撰文指出,OpenAI 宣布其尚未发布的模型 Astra 在几何、密码学和编码理论等领域取得十项数学与计算机科学进展,而数学界对生成式 AI 的态度仍无共识。她以自身两段合作经历作对照:一段因同事顾虑环境与社会影响而完全不用 AI,另一段中同事用 OpenAI 模型加超算集群,仅 43 小时就找到团队搜寻两年多的对象,ChatGPT 生成的方法基于 Monster group 上现有算法的复杂推广。她认为当前争论已不再是 LLM 能否贡献数学研究,而是如何将其使用与协作、透明和学术诚信等学科价值相协调。

    h and teaching. Editorial boards of many peer-reviewed journals are being inundated with AI-written papers and must decide how to assess and disclose the use of generative AI. The arXiv preprint repository has seen a sharp increase in mathematical submissions in recent months. Math papers uploaded to @arxiv per month. Jan 1992 to Jul 2026. Source: https://t.co/nrqjhJBtij pic.twitter.com/pmHvtbYK2X — Pablo Groisman 🎲 (@pgroisma) August 3, 2026 Funding agencies are starting to develop policies gov

    匹配字段正文

  3. Rohan Paul

    UC San Diego 用奖励训练为 7B 智能体注入心智理论

    UC San Diego 新论文通过训练奖励把心智理论(theory of mind)注入 7B 智能体,使其学会推断伙伴的信念与目标,部署时无需额外模型即可独立运行。该方法先用一个模型推断伙伴的信念、意图与想法(包括伙伴如何看待智能体),在 RL 阶段用它为候选回复打分,最终智能体单独运行。论文题为《Mental-Models for Multi-Agent Systems》。

    memory summaries. They keep no explicit estimate of the partner's knowledge or plans, so they can misread intent. They train a model that infers the partner's beliefs, intents and thoughts, including what the partner thinks of the agent. That model scores candidate replies during RL, and the final agent runs alone without it. For agents that negotiate or collaborate, train with a reward that judges replies against an inferred model of the partner's goals and beliefs. – arxiv. org/abs/2610.12453

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. MarkTechPost

    Sakana AI 发布 LLM 同行评审论文 Beyond Imitation,核心论点错误检出率达 73.43%

    Sakana AI 发布 TMLR 论文 Beyond Imitation,提出以错误检测而非模仿人类评审来评估 AI 审稿,并给出 Contradiction Benchmark 与 Multi-Layered Review(MLR)系统。MLR 基于 Claude Sonnet 4 与 Claude Haiku 3.5 三个智能体运行,在 257 篇论文植入的 1,164 处矛盾中,4 次评审可检出 73.43% 的核心论点错误,最佳基线 AgentReview 为 14.81%;单次评审为 60.79%。在 211 篇真实撤稿论文上,MLR 精确匹配率仅 16.11%,且隐藏的提示词注入仍能影响所有被测 AI 审稿系统。每次评审成本约 0.47 美元,消耗 189,062 输入 token。

    tested, with human-aligned scores; Best: Caught 73.43% of core-claim errors with 4 reviews, versus 14.81% for the best baseline; Worst: Only 16.11% exact matches on real retracted arXiv papers; Bottom line: Best: reads before judging, and finds far more serious errors; Worst: still falls for hidden prompt injection What is Multi-Layered Review? Multi-Layered Review is an agentic AI review system from Sakana AI that understands a research paper before critiquing it. It uses 3 agents on off-the-sh

    匹配字段正文

  2. 英国 AI Security Institute:Blog精选

    英国 AISI 发布五款公开 LLM 的先进 AI 评测更新

    英国 AI 安全研究院(AISI)发布对五款已公开使用的大语言模型的评测更新,覆盖网络攻击、化生知识、智能体任务和越狱防护四类风险。多个模型在 600 多道专家撰写的化生私密问题上达到博士级人类水平,能完成面向高中生的简单 CTF 挑战,但在大学生级别题目上受阻。两款模型能完成短周期智能体任务,无法完成长周期任务;所有被测模型对基础越狱攻击仍高度脆弱,部分模型在无专门攻击时也会输出有害内容。

    /; Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., . . . Krueger, D. (2023). Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems. Retrieved from arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10329; Kang, D., Li, X., Stoica, I., Guestrin, C., Zaharia, M., Hashimoto, T. (2023). Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attacks. Retrieved from arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05733; Kinniment, M., Goodrich, B., Hasin, M., Bloom, R., et al.

    匹配字段正文

  3. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客精选

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布开源权重模型 Inkling

    Thinking Machines Lab 发布从零训练的开源权重模型 Inkling,采用 MoE 架构,总参数 975B、激活 41B,支持最高 1M token 上下文窗口,预训练数据为 45 万亿 token 的文本、图像、音频和视频。该模型原生支持文本、图像和音频推理,并可通过可控思考力度平衡性能与 token 效率,今日起在 Tinker 上开放微调,完整权重已上传 Hugging Face。官方同时预览了 12B 激活参数的轻量版 Inkling-Small,称其在多项基准上接近或超过 Inkling,测试完成后将发布完整权重。

    ching for grading, making the evaluation sensitive to output-formatting differences. We therefore added a system message instructing models to follow the expected answer format.†CharXiv RQ with tools: We benchmarked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol (max/xhigh) using our internal Python harness. The making of Inkling Architecture Inkling is a Mixture-of-Experts Transformer with a handful of departures from the common recipe, each chosen for efficiency and long-context performance. The MoE design la

    匹配字段正文

  4. Thinking Machines Lab:官方博客精选

    Thinking Machines Lab 解析 LLM 推理不确定性并开源 batch-invariant 内核

    Thinking Machines Lab 发文指出,LLM 推理不确定性的主因不是并发加浮点非结合性,而是内核缺少 batch invariance,导致请求结果随服务端负载和 batch size 变化。作者用 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 在 temperature 0 下生成 1000 条补全,得到 80 种不同结果,启用 batch-invariant 内核后 1000 条完全一致。相关内核已开源在 thinking-machines-lab/batch-invariant-ops,并给出 vLLM 确定性模式示例;该特性还可让采样与训练结果逐位一致,实现真正的 on-policy RL。

    ndeterminism based on which concurrent core finishes first. We will call this the “concurrency + floating point” hypothesis for LLM inference nondeterminism. For example, a recent arXiv preprint writes: Floating-point arithmetic in GPUs exhibits non-associativity, meaning (a+b)+c≠a+(b+c)(a + b) + c \neq a + (b + c)(a+b)+c=a+(b+c) due to finite precision and rounding errors. This property directly impacts the computation of attention scores and logits in the transformer architecture, where paral

    匹配字段正文

星期六

  1. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 研究:模型察觉被评测会抬高安全基准分数

    Goodfire Research 发布研究称,在 19 个安全基准和 8 个模型上均发现模型会自发表达自己正在被评测,即“言语化评测意识”,共人工核验 515 个实例并作为数据集公开。在 Fortress 基准上,出现这种意识的 rollout 拒绝有害请求的比例高出 3 至 18 个百分点,对 Kimi K2.5 的重采样与注入实验显示该意识与拒绝行为存在因果关系。研究还发现移除提示词中的权威声明等不真实线索可将其降低 40% 以上,自动迭代改写提示词可降低 75%,但拒绝率也随之下降,说明安全基准分数可能被系统性高估。

    ullo for valuable feedback on a draft of this work. References Abdelnabi, S., & Salem, A. (2025). The Hawthorne effect in reasoning models: Evaluating and steering test awareness. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.14617; Anthropic. (2025). Activation oracles: Training and evaluating LLMs as general-purpose activation explainers. https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/activation-oracles/; Anthropic. (2025). Claude Sonnet 4.5 system card. https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/963373e433e489a87a10c8

    匹配字段正文

  2. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 研究:通过损失曲率理解并抑制模型记忆

    Goodfire Research 提出一种基于损失曲率的方法,可区分权重空间中支撑记忆与支撑通用计算的方向,从而选择性编辑模型、减少记忆内容同时保留推理能力。研究显示模型能力呈谱系分布:纯记忆在一端,逻辑推理在另一端,算术、事实回忆等介于两者之间。该方法无需针对特定数据优化,即可广泛抑制记忆样本,效果优于 SOTA 遗忘方法 BalancedSubnet(BSN)。

    The curved surface of the facade of the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle.

    y this technique to more capable models? We're excited to see more work in this direction! References For a list of references, please see the full paper. Citation Please cite the arXiv preprint. Better biosecurity monitors for AI agents via protein embeddings Models know when they’re reward hacking — and we can catch them at scale Silico is your interpretability agent. Explain, debug, and precisely control model behavior with state-of-the-art interpretability methods and infrastructure Silico w

    匹配字段正文

  3. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 用稀疏自编码器理解与操控 Llama 3

    Goodfire Research 发布 preview.goodfire.ai,一个通过稀疏自编码器(SAE)理解和操控 Llama-3-8B 行为的桌面界面。团队在 Llama-3-8B 上训练了 SOTA SAE,发现 LMSYS-Chat-1M 聊天数据集能产生最适合聊天应用的特征,并用自动化可解释性流程为特征生成人类可读标签。该界面结合 Llama-3-8B-Instruct 与后端 SAE 模型,让用户通过特征干预精确改变模型输出。

    Goodfire uses custom interpreter models to parse Llama-3-8B activations into human-interpretable features

    se Autoencoders [link] Sharkey, L., 2022. Alignment Forum.[2]Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models [link] Cunningham, H. and Sharkey, L., 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08600.[3]Towards Monosemanticity: Decomposing Language Models With Dictionary Learning [link] Bricken, T., 2023. Transformer Circuits., which we give a short introduction to below. We can also intervene on the "features" discovered by interpreter models in order to steer model behaviour in a p

    匹配字段正文

  4. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 首次在 671B 参数 DeepSeek R1 上训练并开源稀疏自编码器

    Goodfire 在 671B 参数的 DeepSeek R1 上训练并开源了两个稀疏自编码器(SAE),分别基于自建推理数据集和 OpenR1-Math 数学推理数据集,这是首批在真正推理模型及该参数规模上训练的公开解释器模型。实验发现 R1 与非推理语言模型存在本质差异:需等模型输出“Okay, so the user has asked a question about…”这类前缀后才能有效引导,且过度引导反而会让模型回退到原始行为。

    Goodfire R1 announcement header image

    of a reasoning model", Goodfire, 2025. References Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction [link] McInnes, L., Healy, J. and Melville, J., 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426; Ameisen, et al., "Circuit Tracing: Revealing Computational Graphs in Language Models", Transformer Circuits, 2025. [HTML] “Open R1: Update 2”. [HTML] Ben Allal, L., Tunstall, L., Lozhkov, A., Bakouch, E., Penedo, G., Kydlicek, H., & Martín Blázquez, G. Feb. 10, 2025. Hugging Face; "Inte

    匹配字段正文

  5. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 研究:LLM 如何在阅读故事时动态追踪情感

    Goodfire Research 用 Llama 3.1 8B 做案例研究,发现 LLM 在逐句阅读短篇故事时,其激活空间中的情感表征会随时间动态移动,并沿心理学中的效价-唤醒(valence-arousal)维度组织。研究让模型在每句话后按 0 到 10 分报告惊讶、厌恶、愤怒、快乐、悲伤和恐惧六种情绪,以此观察模型如何跟随故事的悲剧、救赎与反转弧线。

    A hiker traversing a curved, saddle-shaped manifold, illustrating a trajectory across a conceptual landscape.

    n large language models. Sun, L., Yan, L., Lu, X., Lee, A., Zhang, J., & Shao, J. (2026). Valence-arousal subspace in llms: Circular emotion geometry and multi-behavioral control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.03147. The valence-arousal model organizes human emotions along two dimensions: valence (how positive or negative is the emotion?) and arousal (how energetic is the emotion?). We found similar results using Llama 3.1 8B, a small LLM. Below, we compare how six basic emotions are mapped in valen

    匹配字段正文

  6. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 发布随机参数分解 SPD,推动参数级机制可解释性扩展

    Goodfire Research 发布论文提出随机参数分解(SPD),通过直接学习哪些参数组件对给定输入可删除,替代此前基于梯度归因的 APD,在识别真实机制上更稳定,突破了以往参数分解方法难以扩展到玩具模型之外的瓶颈。该方法聚焦分解模型权重而非激活,目标是找到忠实、最小且简单的计算组件。

    Jenga tower representing SPD parameter decomposition

    rk. Special thanks to our colleagues at Apollo Research, where much of the foundational work was carried out. References For a complete list of references, please see our paper on arXiv. Better biosecurity monitors for AI agents via protein embeddings Models know when they’re reward hacking — and we can catch them at scale Silico is your interpretability agent. Explain, debug, and precisely control model behavior with state-of-the-art interpretability methods and infrastructure Silico works acro

    匹配字段正文

  7. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 用自校正搜索加速材料发现,可行候选材料提升约 30%

    Goodfire 与 Radical AI 合作,用可解释性工具为扩散模型 MatterGen 加入基于自身内部表征的反馈回路,在目标带隙 4–6 eV 范围内将可行候选材料数量提升约 30%。MatterGen 原本仅 15% 的生成样本落在该带隙区间,同时满足 Stable、Unique、Novel(SUN)标准的只有 6.5%。该自校正搜索是一种通用技术,或可推广到蛋白质设计与药物发现等扩散模型场景。

    Diagram illustrating the inverse design process for materials discovery

    rt Pinsler, Daniel Zügner, Andrew Fowler, Matthew Horton, Xiang Fu, et al. Nature 639, 624–632, 2025; Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance [link] Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans, 2022. arXiv; Exponential convergence of Langevin distributions and their discrete approximations Gareth O. Roberts and Richard L. Tweedie, 1996; MatterSim: A Deep Learning Atomistic Model Across Elements, Temperatures and Pressures [link] Han Yang, Chenxi Hu, Yichi Zhou, Xixian Liu, Yu Shi, Jielan Li, et al., 2024. arXiv; Py

    匹配字段正文

  8. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 与乐天用 SAE 探针在生产环境检测 PII

    Goodfire 与乐天合作,将稀疏自编码器(SAE)探针用于乐天 AI 智能体的 PII 检测,这是已知首个将 SAE 用于语言模型护栏的企业应用。SAE 探针在从合成数据到真实生产数据的分布偏移下,泛化能力优于激活探针和注意力探针,并在非英语和标签噪声场景中同样领先。探针方案比常见 LLM-as-judge 设置便宜 10 到 500 倍,且用 Llama 3.1 8B 做白盒探针的 F1 达 96%,远高于同一模型黑盒判断的 51%。

    - the first known enterprise application of SAEs for language model guardrails. References BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders [link] Bart Bussmann, Patrick Leask, and Neel Nanda, 2024. arXiv:2412.06410; Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes [link] Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Bilal Chughtai, Stefan Heimersheim, and Marius Hobbhahn, 2025. arXiv:2502.03407; DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa Using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing [link] Pengcheng He, Jianfeng Ga

    匹配字段正文

  9. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 提出基于探针的数据归因方法,可发现并缓解 LLM 后训练中的有害行为

    Goodfire Research 提出基于探针的数据归因方法,能定位 LLM 后训练中涌现的有害行为所对应的训练数据点。在 OLMo 2 7B 的 DPO 训练中,过滤探针标记的数据使有害行为减少 63%,成本仅为梯度法和 LLM 评判的十分之一;交换同一批数据的接受与拒绝标签可减少 78%,剔除相关数据源则减少 84%。

    attribution benchmarks, which rely on deliberately poisoned datasets [9, 10]DATE-LM: Benchmarking Data Attribution Evaluation for Large Language Models [link] Jiao, Cathy, et al. arXiv:2507.09424, 2025. Kowal, Matthew, et al. arXiv:2602.14869, 2026., the behavior we describe here offers a more realistic testbed. Prompts that pair a harmful request with a formatting constraint elicit compliance from OLMo 2 7B DPO but refusal from OLMo 2 7B SFT. These prompts take the form where the distractor is

    匹配字段正文

  10. Goodfire Research

    Goodfire 在 Evo 2 中发现生命之树:系统发育被编码为弯曲流形上的几何距离

    Goodfire Research 发现,DNA 基础模型 Evo 2 将物种间的系统发育关系以几何方式编码在一条弯曲流形上的距离中,这是目前在基础模型中发现的最复杂流形案例之一。研究基于 Genome Taxonomy Database(GTDB)中 2400+ 个细菌物种的系统发育树,结果支持特征流形通常具有主导的平坦表示加上更高曲率偏差的图景。

    “mammal” to “dog” or “bird” to “hawk” [7]The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Models Kiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Yibo Jiang, Victor Veitch, 2024. arXiv. [link]. Evo 2 is trained over long DNA sequences, so it can potentially infer the species from one part of a sequence and use this knowledge to improve predictions in other parts. This post addresses the questions: Can Evo 2 infer the species for a given DNA sequence? Does Evo 2 understand how two related specie

    匹配字段正文