←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 3406 条结果 清除搜索

星期四

  1. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Cerebras 推出面向软件工程 AI 智能体的数据集基础设施

    Cerebras 发布数据集基础设施项目,通过仓库沙箱生成器构建数据整理流水线,为软件工程 AI 智能体打造大规模高质量数据集。该平台从 PyPI 关联项目、高影响力 GitHub 仓库和多模态代码库三条流水线采集代码,并自动完成 Docker 环境构建、差分测试与 FAIL_TO_PASS/PASS_TO_PASS 分类。

    ne was designed with strict quality and activity thresholds to ensure that only mature, collaboratively developed projects were included Together, these pipelines ensure broad coverage across package ecosystems, popular open-source projects, and rich multimodal codebases, resulting in a balanced and rigorously filtered dataset suitable for downstream analysis and model training. Below is a quick reference to the key fields captured for each dataset instance. Code Execution Platform Overivew This

    匹配字段正文

  2. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Cerebras 如何用 AI 辅助面试招聘工程师

    Cerebras 工程团队已把 AI 辅助的多步骤实战练习引入技术面试,允许候选人在 Codex-Spark 和 Cognition 等 AI 编码工具协助下完成真实工程任务。面试不再考察算法背诵,而是评估问题界定、验证输出、判断取舍与沟通能力,候选人需对最终结果负责。

    new tools. It means developing the judgment to use those tools well. Our hiring process should help us identify engineers who can combine technical depth with that new kind of leverage. " Hagay Lupesko SVP of Engineering Here is what changed and what we have learned so far. Instead of centering an interview on an isolated algorithm, we added exercises that resemble the work engineers encounter after joining a team. A candidate might explore a small repository, add a capability to an existing ser

    匹配字段正文

  3. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog精选

    Cerebras 发布 GLM 4.7 迁移指南:10 条提示词与参数调优规则

    Cerebras 发布 GLM 4.7 迁移指南,称其为 Z.AI 最新开源模型,在 LiveCodeBench 上超过 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 模型、仅次于 Gemini 3,并在 GPQA 和 AIME 上超过 Claude Sonnet 4.5。指南给出 10 条使用规则,包括把强制指令放在系统提示词最前、使用 MUST 等明确措辞、显式指定回复语言、为智能体设定角色,以及把任务拆成小步骤以弥补其不支持交错思考。在 Cerebras 上 GLM 4.7 支持约 131K 上下文和最多约 40k 输出 token,可通过 disable_reasoning 和 clear_thinking 控制推理,推荐 temperature=1、top_p=0.95,并兼容 OpenAI Python SDK。

    y quirks. When migrating to GLM 4.7, a common mistake is reusing old prompts without adjusting them for its unique behavior, which can lead to suboptimal performance. To fully leverage GLM 4.7's strengths, it's essential to refine your prompts, architecture, and sampling parameters accordingly. Below are 10 rules to help you get the most from GLM 4.7. On Cerebras, GLM 4.7 supports up to 131K context length. However, like most other large models, the output quality for GLM4.7 is most accurate at

    匹配字段正文

  4. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Cerebras:如何用 AI 生成漂亮的 UI

    Cerebras 博客分享用 AI 生成高质量 UI 的实践:在 Cerebras 上运行的 Codex-Spark 达到约 1,200 tokens/sec,把提示到结果的往返从 3 分钟压缩到 30 秒,加快迭代。文章建议先用 shadcn 预设并接入 shadcn MCP 读取实时组件注册表,再用 Tailwind 配置和设计 token 文件约束颜色、字体与间距,避免模型在生成中途替你做出通用化设计决策。

    n system, I ask it to interview me first. Especially with fast models, this type of back-and-forth iteration and conversation can be done in seconds. It can also be helpful to leverage the grill-me skill. This works well because the model is often better at noticing what’s missing than I am. It will ask things like: Thomas Wiegold’s writeup on frontend-design plugin makes a similar point when it comes to comprehensive style guides: instead of relying on magic tooling, it’s better to force the mo

    匹配字段正文

  5. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Gemma 4 在 Cerebras 上跑出约 2300 tok/s:三个多模态应用实测

    Google 开源多模态模型 Gemma 4 31B 在 Cerebras 上以约 2300 tok/s 运行,首次让开源多模态模型突破 2000 tok/s。实测中,60 页 DeepSeek-V4 技术报告解析仅用 1.79 秒,比 GPU 提供商快 17 倍;基于 17 帧视频的租车损伤检测应用 5 秒内完成全部标注。

    ed. To draw the outlines on the images, we used Gemma 4’s structured outputs to generate the bounding boxes over the images using Javascript. Each batch of three images took an average of 300ms to process. All 17 frames were processed and annotated in just 5 seconds, start to finish. The full side-by-side demo makes the latency difference obvious. Watch on as we run it side-by-side against a popular GPU provider serving the same Gemma 4 31B model. The results speak for themselves. Same request,

    匹配字段正文

  6. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Cerebras 博客:用 Codex 与 Figma MCP 多智能体编排克隆网页

    开发者用 Codex 配合 Figma MCP 和子智能体编排,把 5 页网站近乎完美克隆的时间压缩到 5 分钟以内。单个 Figma 视口仅 HTML、CSS 和内容就要消耗 64k-128K tokens,导致上下文频繁压缩、模型偏离目标,甚至陷入 2 小时以上的循环。作者建议使用最新版 Codex、Figma 预打包 skill,并通过多智能体并行解决上下文与串行执行问题。

    how to use the MCP. The main issues I ran into: - Figma designs taking up too much context - The agents not knowing how to use the updated tool out the box - Long run-times (task drags out for hours) Here’s how I solved them: - Using subagents to ensure we don’t overwhelm a single agent - Looking up skills and guides on Figma’s Github - Parallelise work I asked Codex to go through all the past sessions, figure out the failure points, then search the web on what the proper guidelines would be. 1.

    匹配字段正文

  7. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Cerebras 生态扩展:晶圆级引擎实现最高 15 倍推理加速

    Cerebras 正把超低延迟推理从差异化优势变成平台基础设施,其晶圆级引擎在单芯片上统一算力、内存与带宽,推理速度最高可达传统 GPU 系统的 15 倍。公司同时扩展模型、云与开发者工具生态,覆盖 AG2/AutoGen、CrewAI、Aider、Cline、VS Code、Windsurf 等框架,并支持公有云、本地及私有部署。

    atforms. Visual tools for building AI applications without extensive custom code (Dataiku, DataRobot, Dify, Flowise, FlutterFlow, StackAI). These tools are particularly useful if drag-and-drop AI application development is preferred. Observability and evaluation. Tooling for tracing, evaluation, monitoring, and traffic management in production AI systems (Arize Phoenix, Braintrust, Cloudflare AI Gateway, Helicone, Kong, Langfuse, Operant, Opik, Weave). Solution providers. Channels that help orga

    匹配字段正文

  8. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog

    Cerebras 分享 GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark 最佳实践

    Cerebras 发布一份使用 GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark 的实践指南,该 Codex 变体运行在 Cerebras WSE 硬件上,生成速度超过 1,200 tokens/秒。指南建议把它当作结对编程伙伴而非委派对象,一次只推进一个任务,最多开 2 到 3 个会话且只用于真正独立的模块,并频繁开启新会话、把持久状态放在文件里。文中还给出用 GPT-5.3-Codex 做规划、用 Spark 快速执行的组合流程,以及把测试、评估和文档更新嵌入每一步的做法。

    generation. To get the most out of Spark, start fresh sessions often and keep your research context inside your repo. Treat the context window as working memory, not long-term storage. Keep durable state in files. Keep sessions focused. Reset when goals are complete. A useful mental model is: The best trick for managing context length: break larger tasks into small, bounded goals. Prompt each session to make incremental progress toward one goal, so that every session produces bug-free, well-doc

    匹配字段正文

  9. A6 a6-051 · Cerebras:Blog精选

    Cerebras 与 OpenAI 推出 GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast,输出速度最高 750 tokens/s

    Cerebras 与 OpenAI 公布 Ultrafast Mode 服务层级,首先在 OpenAI API 上线并由 Cerebras 提供算力,初期面向部分客户开放,运行 GPT-5.6 Sol 时输出速度最高 750 tokens/s。Cerebras 称其速度比 Fable 5 快 11 倍、比 Opus 4.8 Fast 模式快 5 倍,并在 HLE 的 2500 道题上以 11 小时 11 分钟完成作答,Claude Fable 5 则耗时 78 小时 27 分钟。该服务基于 Cerebras 的 Wafer-Scale Engine,每颗晶圆级芯片集成 44 GB SRAM,让权重留在片上以减少数据搬运。

    han Varma Product at OpenAI Ultrafast is a persistent edge for organizations using frontier AI to quickly respond to incoming information. Companies operating web services can leverage Ultrafast to root-cause and address production outages, preserving customer trust, preventing lost revenue, and saving downtime minutes against their SLAs. And in adversarial, high stakes cyberattacks, Ultrafast is an invaluable tool for security teams who must quickly detect and respond to bad actors to contain c

    匹配字段正文

  10. Stanford HAI News

    Stanford HAI 学生亲和小组:2026-2027 届申请已截止

    Stanford HAI 的学生亲和小组面向斯坦福本科生、研究生和博士后,围绕以人为本的 AI 与数据科学组成跨学科小组,每组需来自两个以上学科并配一名教职导师,每年可获最高 1,000 美元经费。本轮申请已截止,2026-2027 届名单将于 10 月公布,成员可在学年内随时加入已入选小组。

    del Rocio Martin Rodriguez Graduate Student School of Humanities & Sciences Linguistics The Byte to Bite affinity group will focus on how the computational power of AI can be leveraged to help people make healthier, more sustainable, community-building choices around food. Through personal nutrition, dietary restrictions, location, cultural background, and more, everyone’s definition of healthy eating, and path to get there, is vastly different. AI has become a powerhouse for absorbing these co

    匹配字段正文

  11. Stanford HAI News

    斯坦福研究:X 的“For You”算法把愤怒误当兴趣

    斯坦福团队在 PNAS 发表研究,随机选取 715 名 X 用户,用 Schwartz 基本人类价值观量表对比其“Following”与“For You”信息流,发现与用户价值观不符的帖子更易被算法放大,因为用户更倾向对不认同的内容产生互动。研究者还发布了一款 Chrome 扩展,可按用户自述价值观重新排序信息流。

    A new Stanford-led study finds that X’s “For You” algorithm mistakes outrage for interest – and fills your feed accordingly. In their “For You” pages, social media algorithms purport to find you exactly the kinds of content you want to see and gather it together in one easy-to-peruse section. That is, if you click on and watch enough political videos, you should expect lots of politics in your algorithmically curated feed. But a new study finds a curious phenomenon: The smarter the algorithm get

    匹配字段正文

  12. Stanford HAI News

    斯坦福研究:AI 基准测试可能测错了东西

    斯坦福 HAI 研究人员在两项将于 10 月发表于语言建模会议的研究中指出,AI 基准测试往往并未测量其宣称的能力。研究团队借用测量科学与心理测量学方法,在 56 个广泛使用的基准上反复发现同一模式:宣称测量同一属性的基准结果常常互相矛盾。研究以 BBQ 偏见基准为例,说明该测试实际更接近阅读理解而非偏见;另一项研究则分析安全基准在非英语语言下分数下降的原因,指出无法从单一分数区分模型防护变弱与翻译后题目变难。

    ual safety gaps. It’s really a much more detailed look at the many facets that comprise safety. Measurement science helps us get inside this complexity. What’s at stake for the average person? Truong: We argue that benchmarks are quite consequential to the future of AI. A model’s ranking on a performance leaderboard shapes its market value. It drives financial decisions by developers and investors, and it influences regulations by policymakers. Because benchmarks are key to data-driven, scientif

    匹配字段正文

  13. Stanford HAI News

    Stanford HAI 探讨心理健康 AI 的治理难题

    Stanford HAI 召集研究人员、临床医生、政策制定者与患者权益倡导者,梳理心理健康 AI 治理的三类关键挑战:缺乏对“心理健康 AI”范围的共识、证据基础滞后、以及州与联邦立法碎片化。目前各州已提出 140 多项相关法案,联邦立法仍聚焦未成年人保护。

    ve introduced more than 140 bills related to AI use in mental health contexts. Federal legislation is pending , but so far has been narrowly focused on protection of minors. This fragmented policy landscape is further hindered by a perpetually lagging evidence base : Many purpose-built AI mental health tools lack validated outcomes and representative samples, and are rarely evaluated with rigorous study designs. Meanwhile, the models powering general-purpose chatbots update so rapidly that safet

    匹配字段正文

  14. Stanford HAI News

    斯坦福 HAI:开放权重模型还不够,科学与社会需要真正的开源 AI

    斯坦福 HAI 的 James Landay 指出,开放权重只是“开放分发”,不等于开源 AI:外界仍看不到训练数据、训练代码和构建方式。他主张以 Linux 基金会 Model Openness Framework 最高档“Open Science”为标准,要求代码、训练数据(或可审计的完整说明)与工具链一并公开。他以 Moonshot AI 的 Kimi K3(2.8 万亿参数、百万 token 上下文)和阿里 Qwen3.8-Max(2.4 万亿参数)为例,称中美实验室目前都只回答了“能否运行”,远未回答“能否信任、改进并在此基础上继续构建”。

    row calls “enshittification.” “A closed frontier model behind an API is the ultimate walled garden,” Landay said. “You don’t own your data, your history with the model, or any leverage to leave. That’s already the norm.” The longer someone stays inside one of those gardens, he added, the more of their own context and history the platform accumulates – which only raises the cost of ever leaving, deepening the lock-in rather than easing it over time. There’s a security argument here too: Relying s

    匹配字段正文

  15. Stanford HAI News

    斯坦福 HAI 与 Hoover 研究所拨款 30 万美元,资助三项 AI 地缘政治研究

    斯坦福 HAI 与 Hoover 研究所技术政策加速器各向三个项目拨款 10 万美元,研究周期一年,分别聚焦核扩散探测、美中竞争与基础模型中的政治影响。其中 Mykel Kochenderfer 与 Amy Zegart 团队将设计可跨多语言文本、影像和卫星照片排查核设施迹象的 AI 智能体,并建立标准化 benchmark;Michael Tomz 与 Diyi Yang 将开发双语 AI 访谈工具 CrossInterviewer,对比美中公众对 AI 的态度。

    nuclear proliferation in large-scale satellite imagery dataset, a volume of data that would be prohibitively time consuming to analyze by hand. Now we have the opportunity to leverage multimodal data including multilingual text, online media, and satellite imagery, to design AI protocols to help analysts detect illicit procurement of nuclear proliferation and undeclared nuclear infrastructure. A multidisciplinary team of computer scientists, imagery analysts, and open-source nonproliferation re

    匹配字段正文

  16. Ai2 Blog

    Ai2 发布 olmo-eval:面向模型开发循环的评测工作台

    Ai2 发布 olmo-eval,一个基于 OLMES 标准、面向 LLM 开发全流程的评测工作台,支持智能体与多轮评测,并可按基准需求选择直接运行或容器化运行。它由任务/套件/harness 抽象、沙箱与能力路由层、标准化实验 schema 和成对比较结果查看器四部分组成,报告分数时附带标准误与最小可检测效应。

    view lines the same questions up across two model checkpoints and compares them one by one, with all else held fixed. This helps you to see whether a tiny change in an overall average might indicate a real improvement or simply noise. An integrated evaluation stack olmo-eval is composed of four components that are useful on their own but designed to work together to tighten the experimental LLM development loop: A task/suite/harness abstraction that decouples benchmark logic from runtime policy

    匹配字段正文

  17. Ai2 Blog

    Ai2 研究:混合模型在哪些 token 上预测更准?

    Ai2 对比了同为 7B 的 Olmo 3 与 Olmo Hybrid,发现混合模型在承载语义的实词上优势明显,内容词 loss gap 约 0.04,功能词约 0.02。但在闭合括号以及逐字重复前文内容的 token 上,混合模型的优势几乎消失,这恰是 Transformer 注意力机制的长处。

    token better; a negative gap means the transformer did. To find where the loss gaps might concentrate, we ran several analyses. First, we sorted each token into a category and averaged the loss gap within these categories. Because a raw average can be skewed by other factors, such as a category's rarity or how often tokens repeat in a sample of text, we re-checked each pattern with a regression that estimates the category's own effect while holding other factors constant. We find that Olmo Hybr

    匹配字段正文

  18. Ai2 Blog

    Ai2 推出 DiScoFormer:一个 Transformer 同时估计密度与 score

    Ai2 提出 DiScoFormer(Density and Score Transformer),给定一组数据点即可在单次前向传播中同时估计分布的密度与 score,无需针对新分布重新训练。在 100 维下,相比最优手工调参的 KDE,它将 score 误差降低约 6.5 倍、密度误差降低逾 37 倍,并在训练分布之外的多模态混合及 Laplace、Student-t 等非高斯分布上保持准确。该模型以 GMM 为训练数据,将 KDE 作为特例纳入并加以改进。

    valuate density and score at any point—not just where you have data. Score and density share a mathematical relationship: score is the gradient of the logarithm of density. We leverage this by having a shared backbone with two output heads, one for the density and one for the score. This coupling does more than save parameters. The score head has to match the gradient of the log-density head at every query, so any gap between them is a label-free consistency loss. We use this at inference—hold t

    匹配字段正文

  19. Ai2 Blog

    Ai2 推出 OlmoEarth Platform:行星尺度地理空间推理基础设施

    Ai2 发布 OlmoEarth Platform,用于将地理空间模型从微调、评估推进到大规模推理。平台可在约一天内完成大陆尺度推理,处理数十 TB 影像,成本为每平方公里不到一美分。一次覆盖全北美的野火风险图运行峰值动用约 19,600 个 CPU 和 994 个 GPU,网络吞吐超 168 GB/s,将约 4,737 小时串行计算压缩到约 30.5 小时,实现 155× 加速。

    h Platform, with statistics. Why satellite inference is challenging Most ML models take in a few megabytes of data and produce a result in under a second—think LLMs processing a paragraph of text or computer vision models analyzing a photo from a smartphone. Earth observation inference operates at a very different scale—a single job fine-tuning a foundation model for maximum performance can move terabytes of data and run for hours. The inputs may span multiple spectral bands, sensor types, and t

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. METR Blog精选

    METR 主席 Chris Painter 就 AI 智能体事件向美国参议院作证

    METR 主席 Chris Painter 于 2026 年 9 月 30 日在美国参议院国土安全与政府事务委员会小组委员会作证,主题为 AI 智能体事件,听证会名为“Rogue AI: Securing the Homeland Against AI Agent Attacks”。他回顾了 OpenAI 智能体入侵 Hugging Face 事件:OpenAI 于 7 月 21 日披露此事,METR 与 Redwood Research 的 3 名调查人员随后展开独立调查,报告于 8 月 26 日与 OpenAI 的报告一同发布。他用能力、机会与动机三个要素解释该事件,并指出这类事件并非孤例,多家机构已记录到智能体在无人要求下发起网络攻击的案例。

    od Research is another research organization that assesses AI agent risks and containment measures. ↩ OpenAI, The Hugging Face incident and the road ahead , section ‘Safeguard coverage in internal evaluations’. This is not an uncommon practice within frontier AI agent testing. Blocking agent actions too aggressively can prevent understanding the upper limits of what the agent can do. ↩ This was not the first time OpenAI agents created an unsanctioned “message board.” OpenAI’s report documents si

    匹配字段正文