English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
←Search results
Search “arXiv”
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
AI as a "research partner"—are you really at ease with it?
Anhui University of Finance and Economics reported an academic misconduct case, determining that the author's "mistaken belief" in AI search results constituted improper use of AI and penalizing the responsible parties. Multiple researchers have pointed out that AI can complete closed-loop processes such as literature review and experimental planning, but cannot independently pose original questions, and will generate seemingly plausible yet unverifiable hypotheses and fake citations. An arXiv review of 2.5 million papers and 111 million references shows that in 2025 alone, the four major platforms contained nearly 150,000 fabricated references generated by AI.
use of AI and penalizing the responsible parties. Multiple researchers have pointed out that AI can complete closed-loop processes such as literature review and experimental planning, but cannot independently pose original questions, and will generate seemingly plausible yet unverifiable hypotheses and fake citations. An arXiv review of 2.5 million papers and 111 million references shows that in 2025 alone, the four major platforms contained nearly 150,000 fabricated references generated by AI.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Li Xinyi, a PKU Class of 2007 mathematics alumnus, criticized OpenAI and Anthropic for harming the mathematics community by using AI to solve problems
Li Xinyi, an associate professor at Peking University's Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research and a Class of 2007 mathematics alumnus, criticized OpenAI and Anthropic for using AI to "solve" difficult mathematical problems, arguing that such results are "solved but not understood at all," and that the accompanying publicity will scare off young people who want to study mathematics and mislead funding decisions. He revealed that a postdoc on his team's draft on an obscure conjecture highly overlapped with a cross-disciplinary paper generated by AI on arXiv, ultimately ending in co-authorship, and argued that academic credit should only go to those who contribute to understanding. He also noted that work in applied mathematics of the "combine A with B" type is more easily replaced by AI, while in fields such as geometry and topology that rely on spatial intuition, AI currently learns poorly.
ematics and mislead funding decisions. He revealed that a postdoc on his team's draft on an obscure conjecture highly overlapped with a cross-disciplinary paper generated by AI on arXiv, ultimately ending in co-authorship, and argued that academic credit should only go to those who contribute to understanding. He also noted that work in applied mathematics of the "combine A with B" type is more easily replaced by AI, while in fields such as geometry and topology that rely on spatial intuition, A
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body