←Search results

By relevance · Total 6708 results Clear search

Wednesday

  1. Unite.AI

    Avante Completes $30 Million Series A Funding to Expand AI Agents for Global Benefits Teams

    Avante has completed a $30 million Series A funding round led by Frist Cressey Ventures, bringing total funding to $40 million, with the funds to be used for global expansion and agent platform development. The company has launched a beta version of Ava Agents that runs in the background and outputs for teams to review, and says it has more than 70 customer accounts within 18 months of launch, with the platform covering more than 385,000 employees and dependents. Its technology calls models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google rather than developing its own foundation models.

    Avante has completed a $30 million Series A funding round led by Frist Cressey Ventures, bringing total funding to $40 million, with the funds to be used for global expansion and agent platform development. The company has launched a beta version of Ava Agents that runs in the background and outputs for teams to review, and says it has more than 70 customer accounts within 18 months of launch, with the platform covering more than 385,000 employees and dependents. Its technology calls models from

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. The New Stack

    Replit CEO Says 1937 Coase Theory Will Make Organizational Charts Obsolete

    Replit CEO Amjad Masad has proposed a "self-driving company" vision, arguing that AI agents will compress internal coordination costs within enterprises, and predicts that by the end of 2030 all Fortune 500 companies will become self-driving companies. To this end, Replit has launched Replit for Business and the "Agent Habitat" concept; Cloud Agents are already available to Pro and Enterprise customers, while skills remain in early access. Replit's internal testing shows token consumption dropped 51%, and a data task that originally took 16 minutes was shortened to 1 minute.

    Replit CEO Amjad Masad has proposed a "self-driving company" vision, arguing that AI agents will compress internal coordination costs within enterprises, and predicts that by the end of 2030 all Fortune 500 companies will become self-driving companies. To this end, Replit has launched Replit for Business and the "Agent Habitat" concept; Cloud Agents are already available to Pro and Enterprise customers, while skills remain in early access. Replit's internal testing shows token consumption droppe

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  3. Codex:GitHub Releases

    OpenAI Codex 0.165.0 Released: Adds Google Cloud Vertex AI Provider and…

    OpenAI Codex 0.165.0 adds a built-in Google Cloud Vertex AI provider (configured via model_provider = "gcp") and adds GPT-6.1 Terra to the model catalog. This version also enables memory v2 by default and supports importing external agent memory, while allowing reasoning effort to be adjusted during conversations by default. The session selector adds repository filtering, and the agent command center supports grouping by directory.

    OpenAI Codex 0.165.0 adds a built-in Google Cloud Vertex AI provider (configured via model provider = "gcp") and adds GPT-6.1 Terra to the model catalog. This version also enables memory v2 by default and supports importing external agent memory, while allowing reasoning effort to be adjusted during conversations by default. The session selector adds repository filtering, and the agent command center supports grouping by directory.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  4. NVIDIA Developer · Generative AI

    NVIDIA Explains How to Fine-Tune Nemotron 3.5 Lightning with the Nemotron-Personas Dataset

    NVIDIA has released the Nemotron-Personas France and Belgium datasets and provided a complete post-training workflow for fine-tuning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning with them. The workflow includes defining behavior contracts, generating synthetic conversations with personas, fine-tuning with LoRA on NVIDIA NeMo, merging adapters, and then comparing and evaluating item by item against the base model on a frozen test set. The France dataset was built in collaboration with Pleias, and the Belgium dataset involved Pleias and KU Leuven; the Nemotron repository provides reusable steps and agent skills for data generation, training, and evaluation.

    Flowchart showing eight stages: define target behavior and a holdout set, sample personas, generate conversations, audit and split data, fine-tune with LoRA, merge the adapter, serve the adapted model, and evaluate it against the base model.

    3.5 Lightning with them. The workflow includes defining behavior contracts, generating synthetic conversations with personas, fine-tuning with LoRA on NVIDIA NeMo, merging adapters, and then comparing and evaluating item by item against the base model on a frozen test set. The France dataset was built in collaboration with Pleias, and the Belgium dataset involved Pleias and KU Leuven; the Nemotron repository provides reusable steps and agent skills for data generation, training, and evaluation.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  5. Latent SpaceSelected

    Anthropic's Engineering and Product Leads Discuss the Opus 5.5 Release and Claude's Agent Architecture

    In a Latent Space podcast interview, Anthropic engineering lead Katelyn Lesse and product lead Angela Jiang discussed the Opus 5.5 release, covering adjustments to the model's writing style, pricing based on intelligence per dollar, and API changes such as requiring thinking blocks to be retained across turns to prevent distillation. The interview also described Claude Managed Agents' approach of separating sessions and the harness from the sandbox that executes code, with credentials mounted separately through a proxy so that a sandbox failure does not take down the entire session; Dreaming, meanwhile, is implemented as one managed agent inspecting another agent's history and writing back to memory. The team said that as safety work for model releases has grown heavier, recent efforts have shifted more toward safety, with progress on features such as skills and memory slowing relatively.

    ased on intelligence per dollar, and API changes such as requiring thinking blocks to be retained across turns to prevent distillation. The interview also described Claude Managed Agents' approach of separating sessions and the harness from the sandbox that executes code, with credentials mounted separately through a proxy so that a sandbox failure does not take down the entire session; Dreaming, meanwhile, is implemented as one managed agent inspecting another agent's history and writing back t

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  6. Meta Engineering Blog

    PrivacyLib: Meta implements privacy controls at the data access boundary

    The Meta engineering team has introduced PrivacyLib, a general-purpose privacy library that runs within clients across hundreds of data and processing systems and performs billions of checks per second. A system only needs to integrate it once, and new privacy requirements can reuse that integration as modules, without the need to reimplement them in each system. The newly added Agent Observability module can observe data access events of internal AI agents, and systems that have already integrated it can enable it without additional modifications.

    general-purpose privacy library that runs within clients across hundreds of data and processing systems and performs billions of checks per second. A system only needs to integrate it once, and new privacy requirements can reuse that integration as modules, without the need to reimplement them in each system. The newly added Agent Observability module can observe data access events of internal AI agents, and systems that have already integrated it can enable it without additional modifications.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  7. LangChain BlogSelected

    How LangChain Built the Design Agent Content Studio

    LangChain's GTM engineering team, working with the design team, built Content Studio, a design agent inside Slack, on Managed Deep Agents. It can generate videos, social graphics, UI mockups, and slide decks, and has already produced more than 3,000 assets and over 80 slide decks. The article breaks down its four-layer knowledge structure (skills, wiki, code validation, memory), the dedicated LangSmith Sandbox for each Slack thread, the two rendering engines HyperFrames and the in-house motion-studio, and how the main agent orchestrates asynchronous sub-agents. The team says that after migrating to Managed Deep Agents, its own code shrank by about 80%, the median model cost per request fell from about $8 in mid-September to about 50 cents, and the entire harness has been open-sourced.

    Shreya Talegaonkar

    LangChain's GTM engineering team, working with the design team, built Content Studio, a design agent inside Slack, on Managed Deep Agents. It can generate videos, social graphics, UI mockups, and slide decks, and has already produced more than 3,000 assets and over 80 slide decks. The article breaks down its four-layer knowledge structure (skills, wiki, code validation, memory), the dedicated LangSmith Sandbox for each Slack thread, the two rendering engines HyperFrames and the in-house motion-s

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  8. Full Artificial Analysis articleSelected

    Gemini 4 Carbon Tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5

    Google's Gemini 4 Carbon ranks first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 with a score of 59, leading in four of the 9 evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, and AutomationBench-AA. On the Coding Agent Index, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) paired with the Antigravity CLI scores 59, trailing Claude Code paired with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62 points) by 3 points. The model has a 1M-token context window, supports text, image, video, and speech input, and is priced at a standard rate of $4/$20 per million input/output tokens; it is currently available to select users with a 50% discount.

    Analysis Intelligence Index v5 with a score of 59, leading in four of the 9 evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, and AutomationBench-AA. On the Coding Agent Index, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) paired with the Antigravity CLI scores 59, trailing Claude Code paired with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62 points) by 3 points. The model has a 1M-token context window, supports text, image, video, and speech input, and is priced at a standard rate of $4/$20 per million input/output tokens

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Tuesday

  1. Official Pydantic AI article

    Pydantic Engineer Receives AAIF Outstanding Technical Contribution Award for Maintaining MCP Python SDK

    On the second day of AGNTCon + MCPCon North America, the Agentic AI Foundation presented the Outstanding Technical Contribution Award to Pydantic engineer Marcelo Trylesinski, recognizing his work maintaining the MCP Python SDK. The v2 he led was released in beta alongside the 2026-07-28 version of the MCP specification, adding the MCPServer API and multi-turn round-trip requests, and has since moved to a stable release line with OpenTelemetry tracing enabled by default.

    Marcelo Trylesinski avatar

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  2. Google Developers Blog

    Google A2UI Introduces Swappable Inference Formats, Express Cuts Latency by Up to 3x

    Google A2UI adds swappable inference formats, among which A2UI Express, as the new default format, can reduce latency by up to 3x and cut the tokens needed to generate comparable UIs by up to 3x; when combined with decision models such as Jev for layout decisions, latency reductions can reach up to 80x. Express is now available in the Python agent SDK (a2ui-agent-sdk 0.9.0), the TypeScript SDK (@a2ui/agent), and the Dart SDK (a2ui_agent 0.0.1-wip004); developers can switch formats with a single parameter when creating a generator.

    00-header-1600x900 (1)

    formats, among which A2UI Express, as the new default format, can reduce latency by up to 3x and cut the tokens needed to generate comparable UIs by up to 3x; when combined with decision models such as Jev for layout decisions, latency reductions can reach up to 80x. Express is now available in the Python agent SDK (a2ui-agent-sdk 0.9.0), the TypeScript SDK (@a2ui/agent), and the Dart SDK (a2ui agent 0.0.1-wip004); developers can switch formats with a single parameter when creating a generator.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  3. ElevenLabs Blog

    How to Build an AI Voice Assistant: An ElevenLabs Practical Guide

    ElevenLabs has released a practical guide on how to build an AI voice assistant by chaining speech-to-text, an LLM, and text-to-speech into a real-time pipeline. The guide recommends keeping round-trip responses within 500 ms and pairing this with VAD, while also connecting to internal knowledge bases and business tools, and putting safety measures such as verbal confirmation and handoff to a human agent in place. Developers can build directly with ElevenAPI, or configure and launch on the ElevenAgents managed platform.

    AI voice assistant benchmarks: <500 ms response target, 92% accuracy, and 90+ languages.

    practical guide on how to build an AI voice assistant by chaining speech-to-text, an LLM, and text-to-speech into a real-time pipeline. The guide recommends keeping round-trip responses within 500 ms and pairing this with VAD, while also connecting to internal knowledge bases and business tools, and putting safety measures such as verbal confirmation and handoff to a human agent in place. Developers can build directly with ElevenAPI, or configure and launch on the ElevenAgents managed platform.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  4. gihyo.jpSelected

    OpenAI releases GPT-6.1 Terra, with API pricing at half that of GPT-5.6 Terra

    On October 26, 2026, OpenAI released and made available GPT-6.1 Terra, strengthening visual understanding, computer operation, and writing capabilities. The standard API price is half that of GPT-5.6 Terra, namely $1 per million tokens for input, $0.05 for cached input, and $5 for output. The model has a context window of 1.05 million tokens, a maximum input of 922,000 tokens, and a maximum output of 128,000 tokens. Reasoning effort can be selected from none to max, with medium as the default. On Agents' Last Exam, the medium setting scores 15 points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra while costing about one-third as much; under the max setting, the average speed for completing tasks is more than 3 times that of GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. The model is already available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, and the API model ID is gpt-6.1-terra.

    f 1.05 million tokens, a maximum input of 922,000 tokens, and a maximum output of 128,000 tokens. Reasoning effort can be selected from none to max, with medium as the default. On Agents' Last Exam, the medium setting scores 15 points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra while costing about one-third as much; under the max setting, the average speed for completing tasks is more than 3 times that of GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. The model is already available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGP

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  5. TMTPost · AGI

    OpenAI releases GPT-6.1 Terra, focusing on low-cost computer operation capabilities

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, with API pricing at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, representing a 50% and approximately 58% decrease in input and output prices respectively compared to the previous generation, and only half that of GPT-6.1 Sol. The company claims its task completion rate on Terminal-Bench 4.0 increased from 21.5% to 50.3%, and it scored 60.0% on Agents' Last Exam, close to Claude Opus 5.5's 63.2%. Artificial Analysis measured an intelligence index of 48 at the highest reasoning tier, lower than GPT-6.1 Sol's 52 and Claude Opus 5.5's 58, but the average cost per task dropped from $1.40 to $0.40. Terra is now available via API, and Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users can use it in ChatGPT Work and Codex; it is not yet supported in regular Chat conversations.

    the previous generation, and only half that of GPT-6.1 Sol. The company claims its task completion rate on Terminal-Bench 4.0 increased from 21.5% to 50.3%, and it scored 60.0% on Agents' Last Exam, close to Claude Opus 5.5's 63.2%. Artificial Analysis measured an intelligence index of 48 at the highest reasoning tier, lower than GPT-6.1 Sol's 52 and Claude Opus 5.5's 58, but the average cost per task dropped from $1.40 to $0.40. Terra is now available via API, and Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  6. English text is being prepared.Selected

    OpenAI Releases Low-Cost Model GPT-6.1 Terra, Cost per Task About One-Ninth That of Claude Opus 5.5

    On October 27, OpenAI launched a new model, GPT-6.1 Terra, focused on completing complex computer operation tasks at lower cost, with particular strength in visual reasoning and desktop software operation. At medium reasoning effort on Agents' Last Exam, its score is 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, at about one-third the cost of the latter; at the highest reasoning effort, the cost per task is about one-ninth that of Claude Opus 5.5. The model is now available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users, can be used in ChatGPT Work and Codex, and has the API model identifier gpt-6.1-terra, priced at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens.

    a, focused on completing complex computer operation tasks at lower cost, with particular strength in visual reasoning and desktop software operation. At medium reasoning effort on Agents' Last Exam, its score is 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, at about one-third the cost of the latter; at the highest reasoning effort, the cost per task is about one-ninth that of Claude Opus 5.5. The model is now available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users, can be used in ChatGPT Work and Co

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  7. Phoenix TechnologySelected

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra Model, API Price 50% Lower Than Previous Generation

    OpenAI has launched a new model, GPT-6.1 Terra, focused on visual reasoning, computer operation, and writing capabilities. The standard API price is $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. At medium reasoning effort on Agents' Last Exam, its computer operation score is 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, performing on par with GPT-6 Astra while costing only one-tenth as much per token. The model is now available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, but GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra are still recommended for the most complex programming tasks.

    g capabilities. The standard API price is $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. At medium reasoning effort on Agents' Last Exam, its computer operation score is 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, performing on par with GPT-6 Astra while costing only one-tenth as much per token. The model is now available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, but GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra are still re

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  8. MarkTechPostSelected

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra, API Price at Half of GPT-6.1 Sol

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, replacing GPT-5.6 Terra, with API pricing at $1 per million input tokens and $5 for output, half that of GPT-6.1 Sol. The model supports a 1.05M token context and a maximum output of 128K, targets visual reasoning, computer operation and writing, and is offered only through OpenAI-hosted API, ChatGPT Work and Codex. On Agents' Last Exam v1 it scores 60.0% at the highest effort tier at $1.01 per task, and 85.5% on MMMU-Pro vision, but only 50.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, trailing GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5.

    .6 Terra, with API pricing at $1 per million input tokens and $5 for output, half that of GPT-6.1 Sol. The model supports a 1.05M token context and a maximum output of 128K, targets visual reasoning, computer operation and writing, and is offered only through OpenAI-hosted API, ChatGPT Work and Codex. On Agents' Last Exam v1 it scores 60.0% at the highest effort tier at $1.01 per task, and 85.5% on MMMU-Pro vision, but only 50.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, trailing GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  9. Phoenix TechnologySelected

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra: Enhanced Computer Operation Capabilities, API Price Cut in Half

    OpenAI has launched a new model, GPT-6.1 Terra, focusing on improving visual understanding and computer operation capabilities, with the standard API price reduced by 50% compared to both GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. At medium reasoning effort on Agents' Last Exam, its score is 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, at about one-third the cost; at the highest reasoning effort on Terminal-Bench 4.0, it completes 50.3% of tasks. The model is available starting today to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, with the API model name gpt-6.1-terra, priced at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens.

    visual understanding and computer operation capabilities, with the standard API price reduced by 50% compared to both GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. At medium reasoning effort on Agents' Last Exam, its score is 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, at about one-third the cost; at the highest reasoning effort on Terminal-Bench 4.0, it completes 50.3% of tasks. The model is available starting today to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users of ChatGPT Work and Codex, with the API model nam

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body

  10. BleepingComputerSelected

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra, Agent Tasks 3x Faster and 50% Cheaper

    OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, focused on computer operation, visual reasoning, coding, and everyday office work. API pricing is $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. On Agents' Last Exam, at medium reasoning effort it scores 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra at about one-third the cost, and completes tasks more than 3x faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Internal benchmarks show the error rate at low reasoning effort dropped from 53.6% to 16.7%, and it scores 50.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at maximum reasoning effort, compared with 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra. The model is now available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex, with the API model name gpt-6.1-terra.

    , visual reasoning, coding, and everyday office work. API pricing is $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. On Agents' Last Exam, at medium reasoning effort it scores 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra at about one-third the cost, and completes tasks more than 3x faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Internal benchmarks show the error rate at low reasoning effort dropped from 53.6% to 16.7%, and it scores 50.3% o

    Matched fieldsSummary

Monday

  1. Full article from Artificial Analysis

    OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra, Further Improving Cost Efficiency

    OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra, with input/output prices of $1/$5 per million tokens, lower than GPT-5.6 Terra's $2/$12. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, at the highest effort level it scores 6 points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, with a cost per task of $0.40 versus $1.40; at the low and medium effort levels it sits at the frontier of intelligence and cost. On the AA-Omniscience benchmark, the model's guess rate when it does not know the answer dropped from 88% to 38%, while accuracy simultaneously improved by 2 points; Terminal-Bench 4.0 improved by about 20 points, and Coding Agent Index v2.0 scored 48.

    the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, at the highest effort level it scores 6 points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra, with a cost per task of $0.40 versus $1.40; at the low and medium effort levels it sits at the frontier of intelligence and cost. On the AA-Omniscience benchmark, the model's guess rate when it does not know the answer dropped from 88% to 38%, while accuracy simultaneously improved by 2 points; Terminal-Bench 4.0 improved by about 20 points, and Coding Agent Index v2.0 scored 48.

    Matched fieldsSummary、Body