English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Nathan Lambert argues that the current debate over the online risks of open models has reached a stalemate: although Anthropic's report on GLM-5.3 as an offensive cyber tool is technically sound, it sidesteps key questions such as "what would happen if open models were banned" and "why do Chinese companies believe it is safe to release them." He points out that most recorded cyberattacks to date have been carried out by closed models, and that if open-weight models were banned on cyber-risk grounds, it might also be necessary to ban public APIs for frontier closed models.
Nathan Lambert argues that the current debate over the online risks of open models has reached a stalemate: although Anthropic's report on GLM-5.3 as an offensive cyber tool is technically sound, it sidesteps key questions such as "what would happen if open models were banned" and "why do Chinese companies believe it is safe to release them." He points out that most recorded cyberattacks to date have been carried out by closed models, and that if open-weight models were banned on cyber-risk grou
Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body

Matched fieldsSummary、Body
Matched fieldsSummary、Body