←Story detail

Trending story

Artificial Analysis Launches Dual HealthBench Leaderboards

2 reports2 story updatesUpdated Oct 20 07:03

Understand this story

AI overview

Artificial Analysis has launched leaderboards for OpenAI's two health dialogue benchmarks, HealthBench and HealthBench Professional. HealthBench contains 5,000 conversations with general users and health workers, while HealthBench Professional consists of 525 conversations all aimed at clinicians. The leaderboard results show that on HealthBench Professional, GPT-6 Astra (max) ranks first with a length-adjusted score of 66.0%, followed by GPT-6.1 Sol (max) at 65.1% and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) at 63.0%; on HealthBench, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) leads with 62.1%, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) scores 60.9%. In addition, Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 give average answers of about 5,900 characters, losing more than 11 points after length adjustment. There are currently no further developments.

AI-generated from public reports

Latest development · Report

English translation is being prepared.

Developments

1 confirmed developments

  1. Artificial Analysis launches HealthBench and HealthBench Professional leaderboards

    Source:Artificial Analysis (full article)

Reports and discussion timeline

Browse reports and discussion by time. Their evidence levels remain distinct.

Oct 20

  1. artificialanlys

    English translation is being prepared.

Oct 19

  1. Artificial Analysis full articleFirst-partySelected

    Artificial Analysis launches HealthBench and HealthBench…

    Artificial Analysis has launched leaderboards for OpenAI's two health dialogue benchmarks, HealthBench and HealthBench Professional; the former contains 5,000 conversations with general users and health workers, while the latter consists of 525 conversations all aimed at clinicians. On HealthBench Professional, GPT-6 Astra (max) ranks first with a length-adjusted score of 66.0%, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) is at 65.1%, and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) is at 63.0%. On HealthBench, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) leads at 62.1%, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) is at 60.9%; Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 average about 5,900 characters per answer and lose more than 11 points after length adjustment.

Related stories

  1. Related storiesMiniMax releases the M3.1 Flash model
  2. Related storiesMeta launches Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full models
  3. Related storiesDeepSeek open-sources inference framework DeepInfer
  4. Related storiesEnglish translation is being prepared.