Image-to-WebDev Arena 更新：Claude Opus 5.5 登顶，Sonnet 5.5 紧随其后
Image-to-WebDev Arena update: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) by @AnthropicAI takes the #1 spot with 1749 pts, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh) just 9 pts behind at #2 with
Image-to-WebDev Arena 更新显示，Anthropic 的 Claude Opus 5.5（Max）以 1749 分登顶，Claude Sonnet 5.5（xHigh）以 1740 分、9 分之差位列第二，两款模型均进入帕累托前沿。价格方面，Opus 5.5 的混合输入输出 token 价格为 $16/M，比第三名 GPT-6 Astra 的 $40/M 低 60%；Sonnet 5.5 为 $8/M，比 Opus 便宜 50%，且排名高于 GPT-6 Astra 而成本低 80%。该榜单评估模型从图像和截图生成网站的能力，以及涉及多步推理和工具调用的智能体编码工作流。
推荐理由
精选AI 评分 67
榜单同时给出分数与每百万 token 价格，读者可据此比较 Claude 与 GPT 在图像转网页任务上的性价比。
主题
正文
当前显示原文，中文全文译文尚未就绪。
Image-to-WebDev Arena update: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) by @AnthropicAI takes the #1 spot with 1749 pts, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh) just 9 pts behind at #2 with 1740 pts!
Both models also landed on the Pareto frontier! See their positioning on the visual in thread.
- #1-ranked Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) has a blended input/output token price of $16/M. This is 60% lower than #3-ranked GPT-6 Astra at $40/M. - #2-ranked Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh) costs $8/M, 50% less than Opus for a 9-point score gap. It also ranks one place above GPT-6 Astra (#3) while costing 80% less.
Stay tuned to see where Claude Haiku 5.5 lands in the Image-to-WebDev Arena!
The Image-to-WebDev Arena ranks AI models on their ability to generate websites from images and screenshots, alongside agentic coding workflows involving multi-step reasoning and tool use.