GPT-6.1 Sol 发布：7 天取代 GPT-6 Sol，智能接近 GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence | Artificial Analysis
GPT-6.1 Sol 在 GPT-6 Sol 发布仅 7 天后将其取代，Intelligence Index 比 GPT-6 Sol 高 4 分、比 GPT-5.6 Sol 高 5 分，仅比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分。其定价与 GPT-6 Sol 相同（$2/$10 每百万输入/输出 token），但缓存读取折扣从 90% 提升至 95%；max effort 下每个 Intelligence Index 任务成本 $0.72，不到 GPT-6 Astra（$3.26）的四分之一，比 GPT-6 Sol（$1.05）低 31%。
正文
当前显示原文，中文全文译文尚未就绪。
All articles
September 29, 2026
GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days. It scores 1 point below GPT-6 Astra in the Intelligence Index at less than one quarter of the Cost per Task.
Pricing matches GPT-6 Sol at $2/$10 per million input/output tokens, except that the cache read discount rises from 90% to 95%. GPT-6.1 Sol’s overall blended price for agentic workloads is therefore slightly lower than GPT-6 Sol. This represents an additional price cut, following GPT-6 Sol’s original 50% discount from GPT-5.6 Sol.
Key takeaways:
➤ Achieves near-Astra Intelligence: GPT-6.1 Sol gains 4 points in the Intelligence Index vs GPT-6 Sol, and 5 points vs GPT-5.6 Sol - landing 1 point below GPT-6 Astra. It makes significant gains in agentic knowledge work, improving 4 points and 5 points in AA-Briefcase v1.1 and GDPval-AA v2.1 respectively. Other notable gains include a 12 point jump in Terminal-Bench 4.0, a 5 point jump in Humanity’s Last Exam, a 6 point jump in GDP.pdf, and an 8 point jump in AA-Omniscience Accuracy coupled with hallucination rate falling from 60% to 54%.
➤ Pushes cost efficiency frontier: At max effort, GPT-6.1 Sol costs less than a quarter of GPT-6 Astra per Intelligence Index task ($0.72 vs $3.26). It also costs 31% less per task than GPT-6 Sol ($1.05) and 64% less than GPT-5.6 Sol ($1.99). All effort levels of GPT-6.1 Sol push out the cost efficiency Pareto frontier: for a given level of intelligence, there is no cheaper model.
➤ Pushes token efficiency frontier, but uses slightly more output tokens than GPT-6 Sol: GPT-6.1 Sol uses ~10-30% more output tokens than GPT-6 Sol across effort levels. However, due to the increase in Intelligence Index score, its low and medium effort levels are Pareto optimal for token efficiency.
➤ Gains in Coding Agent Index: GPT-6.1 Sol gains 3 points on GPT-6 Sol at max effort in the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, and sits 2 points below GPT-6 Astra.
Coding Agent Index
GPT-6.1 Sol dominates the lower-price range of the Pareto frontier for Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs Cost per Task. GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh) scores 1 point above GPT-6 Astra for less than 15% of the Cost per Task. This represents a 6 point gain from GPT-6 Sol (max). We observed the xhigh effort setting to outperform the max effort setting by 3 points.
Token efficiency
GPT-6.1 Sol uses 10-30% more output tokens than GPT-6 Sol across effort settings in the Intelligence Index. However, due to increases in intelligence, its low and medium effort settings are Pareto optimal for token efficiency.
AA-Omniscience
At max effort, GPT-6.1 Sol jumps 8 points in AA-Omniscience Accuracy coupled with a 6 point reduction in hallucination rate.
AA-Briefcase
GPT-6.1 Sol improves by ~80 Elo in AA-Briefcase. This is driven by increases in its rubric score and Analytical Quality Elo, while Presentation Elo falls slightly.
Results by evaluation
Breakdown of the individual evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2.
Compare GPT-6.1 Sol with other leading models at: artificialanalysis.ai/models/releases/gpt-6-1-sol
Artificial Analysis Decision Index v1.0
The Artificial Analysis Decision Index benchmarks decision models, a new category of models that answer structured decisions in a single call with a probability for each option. Version 1.0 combines four evaluations across classification, tool calling, knowledge, hallucination, and reasoning.
October 13, 2026
Announcing AA-3D: a benchmark for AI models building interactive 3D experiences
AA-3D is a new benchmark of how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Each model turns a written brief into a working three.js scene in an offline sandbox, and our recruited panel compares the scenes in blind pairwise votes.
October 12, 2026
Announcing FrontierCode on Artificial Analysis: can AI models write code maintainers would merge?
Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1 tests whether AI models make code changes that maintainers of real open source repositories would merge. Leading models still fail more than 40% of the time.
October 12, 2026
Artificial Analysis
Get notified about new articles
About; Methodology; Contact; Articles; Careers