Artificial Analysis 编程智能体指数：Claude Sonnet 5.5、GPT-6.1 Sol 与 Gemini 4 Argon 性能成本对比
This week Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon all launched near the top of the Coding Agent Index leaderboard, but each has a different balance of
Artificial Analysis 的编程智能体指数本周迎来 Claude Sonnet 5.5、GPT-6.1 Sol 和 Gemini 4 Argon 三款新模型，它们均接近榜单前列，但性能与成本取舍不同。该指数以模型加运行框架的组合为单位，跨三项智能体编程评测打分：Claude Sonnet 5.5（max）在 Claude Code 中以 68 分居首，单任务成本最高为 14.19 美元；Gemini 4 Argon（high）在 Antigravity CLI 中得 64 分，单任务 5.84 美元，不到 Sonnet 5.5 的一半，但采用 Google 促销定价且 Argon 尚未公开可用；GPT-6.1 Sol（xhigh）在 Codex 中得 63 分，单任务 1.04 美元，约为 Argon 的六分之一。
推荐理由
精选AI 评分 71
同一榜单上三款新模型的分数与单任务成本差异明显，读者可据此比较性能与开销的取舍。
主题
正文
当前显示原文，中文全文译文尚未就绪。
This week Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon all launched near the top of the Coding Agent Index leaderboard, but each has a different balance of performance and cost
The Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index measures agents (a combination of model and harness) across three agentic coding evaluations.
➤ Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) in Claude Code takes the top spot at 68, but also has the highest measured cost per task: $14.19
➤ Gemini 4 Argon (high) in Antigravity CLI scores 64 at $5.84 per task - less than half of Sonnet 5.5’s cost. Note, this uses Google’s promotional pricing, and Argon is not yet publicly available
➤ GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh) in Codex scores 63 at $1.04, roughly one sixth of Argon’s cost