←新闻详情

The Guardian Technology更新于 10月21日 22:36

津巴布韦作家否认用AI写获奖小说,Caine奖审查指控

Zimbabwean author Simbarashe Kundizeza denies using AI to write prize-winning story | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian

AI 导读

津巴布韦作家 Simbarashe Kundizeza 否认使用生成式 AI 创作获奖短篇小说《The Blue Fighter》,该作品于 10 月 6 日获得 Caine 非洲作家奖。五天后《大西洋月刊》刊发 Vauhini Vara 的文章,称 AI 检测软件 Pangram 判定该小说几乎完全由 AI 生成。Caine 奖表示正在审查相关指控,其主席 Ellah Wakatama 质疑 AI 检测软件作为最终裁决者的可靠性。

推荐理由

AI 评分 64

事件呈现了AI检测工具被当作文学奖评判依据的争议,读者可看到检测可靠性与创作者权益之间的张力。

主题

标签

正文

当前显示原文,中文全文译文尚未就绪。

Article in Atlantic claims The Blue Fighter was artificially generated, days after it won Caine prize for African writers

The Zimbabwean writer Simbarashe Kundizeza has denied using AI to write a prize-winning short story after an article in the Atlantic said software had flagged it as almost completely AI-generated.

Kundizeza’s story The Blue Fighter was announced as the winner of the prestigious Caine prize for African writers on 6 October. Five days later, The Atlantic published an article by the author and journalist Vauhini Vara titled: “Yet Another Literary prize winner Seems to Be AI.”

Vara said that she had run the story through the AI-detection software Pangram, which itself uses AI, and it had deemed the story to be almost completely artificially generated. The exception, she said, was an epigraph from what is described as an unpublished poem by the South African writer Vangile Gantsho.

Vara said that when she read the story, she “was struck by the proliferation of language that is common in AI-produced writing: the not x, but y sentence constructions; the glut of metaphors; the platitudinous aphorisms”.

She said: “Taste is subjective, but trust me, this story is bad – maudlin and full of tired tropes.”

Kundizeza responded in a statement on X: “For the avoidance of doubt, I wrote ‘The Blue Fighter’. I did not use generative AI to write it. It is entirely my own work.

“I look forward to continuing to work with the Caine prize team, and to celebrating this recognition with the people who helped bring this story into the world. Most importantly, I will continue to write.”

Similar claims have been made recently about other literary prize winners. In July, the Trinidadian writer Jamir Nazir won the Commonwealth Foundation’s short story prize with The Serpent in the Grove, despite critics on social media claiming it had “obvious markers” of AI writing.

Last month, the Canadian-Haitian writer Thélyson Orélien’s novel C’était Ça Ou Mourir (It Was That or Die) was removed from the longlist of France’s most prestigious literary prize, the Goncourt, after an anonymous online account alleged the book was “almost entirely” written by AI.

The Caine prize said in a statement that it was reviewing the allegations that Kundizeza had used AI. It said: “When such claims are made, it is our responsibility to look into them. We aim to do this by taking a human-centred approach, ensuring that writers are supported and cared for during the process.”

Its chair questioned the reliability of AI-detection software itself.

Ellah Wakatama told the BBC’s Front Row radio show: “As someone who chairs a prize, I’m obviously not against AI, but what I am against is it being used as a final arbiter in this case, regardless of what the Atlantic says, because they have already proclaimed our winner to be a cheater without investigating it properly.

“I am not happy for the work of writers, and in this case especially black writers, to form the testing ground for something that is at best still rough and ready.”

Vara said in her article, and repeated in an interview with Front Row, that she had read a 2021 story by Kundizeza that was tonally and stylistically different from The Blue Fighter.

In his statement, he responded: “To suggest that a writer cannot write in different styles or genres, or improve his writing substantially after five or more years fundamentally misunderstands the craft of writing.”

Vara pointed to Pangram’s own research that found that false positives were rare, including for non-native English speakers writing in English, as well as a peer-reviewed journal article that found Pangram had “strong accuracy” when assessing mock academic papers created fully, partly or with no AI. However, she acknowledged to the BBC that there was “relatively little third-party research” on the accuracy of AI detection software.

AI (artificial intelligence); Caine prize; The Atlantic; Short stories; Awards and prizes; Fiction; Zimbabwe; news

AI tool that copied actor’s ‘lustrous’ voice violated his rights, Tokyo court rules30 Sept 2026; Threat of AI share crash puts world financial stability at risk, says IMF1d ago; Nicola Coughlan and Matt Lucas among stars backing campaign against AI voice cloning28 Aug 2026; Chip stocks slide after Broadcom boss likens AI investing to ‘casino’1d ago; AI less regulated than milk, Microsoft president says in warning over safety3d ago; Granta stops publishing short story award winners over AI controversy20 Jun 2026; OpenAI projected to bring in $20bn less in revenue than expected6d ago; Jean-Michel Jarre urges music and film industries to embrace AI21 Apr 2026; ‘Soon publishers won’t stand a chance’: literary world in struggle to detect AI-written books29 Mar 2026; ‘Dystopian’: Co-op becomes latest firm to put staff under AI surveillance7d ago

Most viewed

来源

The Guardian Technology