Aditya Agarwal:Goodfire 或成 SPC 最重要公司之一
I strongly believe that Goodfire might be one of the most important companies to come out of @spc.
Aditya Agarwal 表示,他坚信 Goodfire 可能是出自 @spc 的最重要公司之一,因为该公司正在证明可解释性与对齐可以被当作工程问题来处理。 其引用的 Nick 帖子称,可解释性可能是当下全球最重要的科学问题,并认为借助现代智能体工具,可解释性有望在人们最需要它之前被解决。
查看原帖interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled…
展开完整原文
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works https://t.co/zHij5zwKGT
正文
当前显示原文,中文全文译文尚未就绪。
I strongly believe that Goodfire might be one of the most important companies to come out of @spc.
They are showing that interpretability and alignment can approached as engineering problems. Whew.