OpenAI 首席战略官 Jason Kwon 赴澳就智能体越权访问事件道歉，关键问题仍未解答

Kwon’s answers were provided in a helpful, quiet and calm manner, but his mea culpa left the audience not much the wiser

Open AI’s Jason Kwon flew 15 hours from San Francisco to Sydney to give the company’s first in-person mea culpa after it admitted – in an unsigned email, to a public departmental inbox – that one of its AI agents had accessed a Services Australia website without authorisation and grabbed data related to Medicare.

Kwon – polite, friendly, even-toned – got through a potentially dicey parliamentary committee hearing unscathed, promising to do better and pledging assistance to Australia. No missteps, no viral moments, just delivering his answers helpfully, in a quiet and calm manner, sympathising with the questioner and the point they were making.

In other words, just like ChatGPT.

Even the content of his responses evoked the AI assistant he was there to defend.

Asked by the senator David Pocock “why did you send an email to an arbitrary department email?”, Kwon replied: “In retrospect, we should have done what you’re suggesting.” Asked why Open AI’s CEO Sam Altman wasn’t informed before his meeting with Australia’s deputy prime minister Richard Marles, and why the company didn’t fess up there, Kwon said: “I agree the process by which people became aware of this incident inside our company could have been much better”.

One couldn’t help but be reminded of the way the chatbot responds when pulled up on a mistake: “Good catch. You’re right to push back. My bad, that one’s on me.”

In Kwon’s parlance, the models – built from the ground up by OpenAI, which reportedly wants to value itself at $1.4tn – “accessed Australian government websites in ways they were not directed to.” He tried to explain that the “novelty” of this incident meant the company had “learned our lesson”, which was that it should inform victims of such incidents much earlier, rather than waiting.

Kwon again apologised for the company only sending a casual email to the federal government disclosing that its agent had inappropriately accessed Medicare statistics, but tried to explain to Tuesday’s parliamentary hearing that it was sometimes “difficult” to figure how to make such notifications to a big sprawling public service.

Pocock helpfully offered: “I assume someone in your government relations team has mobile phone numbers of ministers and various people?”

There was a similar air of post-facto contrition as Kwon – OpenAI’s chief strategy officer – could offer few answers about why Altman didn’t inform Marles about the incident when they met face-to-face in San Francisco on 1 September. That was nine days before the company emailed Services Australia, and nearly a whole month after it first learned of the 18 June intrusion.

Kwon said Altman wasn’t aware of the incident before the Marles meeting. After Tuesday’s committee hearing, it’s still unclear why.

Sign up to Politics, really

Our political team brings you up to speed on the stories that really matter and what they mean for you

It’s a big government, and maybe Kwon is right that it’s “difficult” to find the right person to talk to. But some could also argue that your boss shaking hands with Australia’s deputy prime minister would be something of a useful window.

At least, we learned, he said the company didn’t use AI to write the infamous email. Small blessings that they managed to ask a human to write it – even if it went to an obscure inbox.

But with Australia striving to become a tech capital for datacentres and AI – as the revolving door of big tech companies told the inquiry, from Anthropic to Microsoft and Google – then setting the basic rules of the road for these firms, about how they must act and respond to this country and its government, is critical.

Kwon said OpenAI was committed to providing future notifications “very quickly”, and that there were no further incidents they were aware of. But he casually dropped in one staggering fact: OpenAI was still trawling through the activity logs for the agents involved in the Services Australia breach, with those logs totalling 50 petabytes of data.

A petabyte is 1,000 terabytes, or 1m gigabytes.

Kwon made the mind-boggling claim that it would take a human 66m years – never sleeping, never resting – to go through that data by hand.

The team tasked with checking Services Australia’s email inboxes must be hoping there aren’t any more dramas lurking in there.

OpenAI; AI (artificial intelligence); David Pocock; Anthropic; Australian politics; Labor party; news

The biggest threat from AI is the sense that we have no say in it. To that I say game on1d ago…… comments; Full StoryHow Firmus went from Australia’s AI ‘fairytale’ to flop - Full Story podcast1d ago; Australia may risk a diplomatic spat with the Trump administration if it limits the viewing of a US execution2d ago…… comments; Dystopian and dehumanising: that’s what it felt like when I was interviewed by an AI assistant2d ago…… comments; From boom to bust in five days: how Firmus’s much-hyped Australian stock market listing imploded5d ago; Firmus pulls biggest ASX float since Telstra amid investor doubt about datacentre company5d ago; OpenAI used AI to help write email warning Australian government AI had hacked its websites7d ago; Privacy watchdog launches investigation into China-based company behind Kmart ‘pervert glasses’ app7 Oct 2026; OpenAI came to Australia to apologise. It will leave without answering these key questions 7 Oct 2026…… comments; Pornhub returns to Australia after banning access due to age verification rules 7 Oct 2026