Dan Shipper 团队实测 Gemini 4：写作出色，重构与自检偏弱
BREAKING: Gemini 4 is OUT and it's SURPRISINGLY GOOD??
Dan Shipper 称 Gemini 4 已发布，他与 every 团队六人用一周时间在编码、写作、设计和知识工作上做了实测，结果好于预期。他认为 Gemini 4 是出色的写作搭档，擅长梳理结构与打磨比喻，但在重构既有代码库和自检上表现不佳：在 Senior Engineer 基准的重构任务中运行 4 小时 47 分钟仅得 21%，而 GPT-6 Astra、Fable 5.1、Sonnet 5.5 和 Opus 5.5 为 81% 至 85%；Kieran 的 38 次基准运行中有 17 次代码审查步骤仅相隔 30 毫秒就开合。他还指出 Google 的桌面智能体应用 Antigravity 落后 Claude Code 和 Codex 约半年到一年，缺少云环境、SSH、内置浏览器和智能权限检查，建议通过 Cursor 或 API 使用该模型。
推荐理由
AI 评分 66
作者团队用一周实测给出 Gemini 4 在写作与编码上的强弱分布，可据此判断它适合接哪些任务。
主题
正文
当前显示原文，中文全文译文尚未就绪。
BREAKING: Gemini 4 is OUT and it's SURPRISINGLY GOOD??
I admit I was ready to trash this model qhen I saw the benchmarks but six of us at @every spent the past week testing it across coding, writing, design, and knowledge work, and were pleasantly surprsied.
It’s a breakthrough if your company lives in Google’s ecosystem, and a strong option for frontier hoppers as a secondary model for certain tasks. I
Here’s our vibe check:
My new favorite writing partner. DeepMind hired professional writers with red pens to stamp out AI slop, and it worked. I use it to untangle structure and sharpen metaphors; it also taught me something new tracing in a few of my favorite books. It's got a natural feel for structure and detailed explanations that Astra and Opus lack.
Shaky at refactors, fast on greenfield apps. At low effort on a from-scratch build, Gemini 4 built @kieranklaassen a working webcam heart-rate monitor in 35 minutes—matching Claude Opus 5.5’s quality and beating OpenAI’s models on that test. Where it cuts corners is self-verification and existing codebases. In 17 of Kieran’s 38 benchmark runs, it opened and closed its code-review step just 30 milliseconds apart instead of inspecting its changes. And on my Senior Engineer benchmark—refactoring a vibe coded slop codebase—it worked for four hours and 47 minutes and scored just 21% (versus 81% to 85% for GPT-6 Astra, Fable 5.1, Sonnet 5.5, and Opus 5.5). Not great.
A 2026 model trapped in a 2025 harness. Antigravity, Google’s desktop agent app, feels six months to a year behind Claude Code and Codex—lacking cloud environments, SSH, a built-in browser, and smart permission checks (leaving you clicking constant pop-ups or using unrestricted "Turbo" mode).
Net Result: I keep ChatGPT and Claude open day to day, and switch to Gemini 4 when I need an editorial partner to structure a tough essay, sharpen a metaphor, or close-read a book. Reach for it for live writing collaboration, fast low-effort prototypes, or steerable UI and dashboard design—ideally via Cursor or the API to skip Antigravity.
When a model is good enough to force you to use a bad harness, it tells you something.
State of Play: Google hadn’t shipped a major flagship upgrade since Gemini 3 Pro last November. For teams whose companies live in Google’s ecosystem, the model you can use inside your approved work tools finally belongs with the frontier pack. DeepMind closed the model gap; now Google needs to bring the app around it into 2026.
Read our full vibe check: https://t.co/ZRITq2iFyl