Anthropic 承认 Claude Code 用户用量超预期提前触顶
Anthropic admits Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'
Anthropic 承认 Claude Code 用户触达用量上限的速度远超预期,称正在调查并将此列为团队首要任务。有用户反映 Pro 订阅每月 30 天中仅约 12 天可用,Max 5 计划一小时内即耗尽原本可支撑 8 小时的额度。可能原因包括上周对高峰时段收紧配额、3 月 28 日结束的双倍用量促销,以及有用户逆向分析后称发现两个导致 prompt cache 失效、成本虚增 10-20 倍的 bug,部分用户降级到 2.1.34 后有所改善。
推荐理由
AI 评分 67
Anthropic 承认 Claude Code 用量消耗远超预期,并列出配额收紧、促销结束与缓存 bug 三重可能原因,读者可据此判断订阅配额的实际风险。
主题
正文
当前显示原文,中文全文译文尚未就绪。
AI/ML
Users of Claude Code, Anthropic's AI-powered coding assistant, are experiencing high token usage and early quota exhaustion, disrupting their work.
Anthropic has acknowledged the issue, stating that "people are hitting usage limits in Claude Code way faster than expected. We're actively investigating... it's the top priority for the team."
A user on the Claude Pro subscription ($200 annually) said on the company's Discord forum that "it's maxed out every Monday and resets at Saturday and it's been like that for a couple of weeks... out of 30 days I get to use Claude 12."
The Anthropic forum on Reddit is buzzing with complaints. "I used up Max 5 in 1 hour of working, before I could work 8 hours," said one developer today. The Max 5 plan costs $100 per month.
There are several possible factors in the change. Last week, Anthropic said it was reducing quotas during peak hours, a change that engineer Thariq Shihipar said would affect around 7 percent of users, while also claiming that "we've landed a lot of efficiency wins to offset this."
March 28 was also the last day of a Claude promotion that doubled usage limits outside a six-hour peak window.
A third factor is that Claude Code may have bugs that increase token usage. A user claimed that after reverse engineering the Claude Code binary, they "found two independent bugs that cause prompt cache to break, silently inflating costs by 10-20x." Some users confirmed that downgrading to an older version helped. "Downgrading to 2.1.34 made a very noticeable difference," said one.
The documentation on prompt caching says that the cache "significantly reduces processing time and costs for repetitive tasks or prompts with consistent elements." That said, the cache has only a five-minute lifetime, which means stopping for a short break, or not using Claude Code for a few minutes, results in higher costs on resumption.
Developers can upgrade the cache lifetime to one hour but "1-hour cache write tokens are 2 times the base input tokens price," the documentation states. A cache read token is 0.1 times the base price, so this is a key area for optimization.
Anthropic does not state the exact usage limits for its plans. For example, the Pro plan promises only "at least five times the usage per session compared to our free service." The Standard Team plan promises "1.25x more usage per session than the Pro plan." This makes it hard for developers to know what their usage limits are, other than by examining their dashboard showing how much quota they have consumed.
Problems like this are not unusual. Earlier this month, users of Google Antigravity were protesting about similar issues.
Bugs aside, what we are seeing is an implicit negotiation between users and providers over what is an acceptable pricing and usage model for AI development. Users want to control costs and providers need to make a profit. There is also a disconnect between vendor marketing that urges developers to insert AI into every process, including in some cases automated workflows, and a quota system that can cause AI tools to stop responding.
"For folks running Claude Code in automated workflows: rate-limit errors need to be caught explicitly – they look like generic failures and will silently trigger retries. One session in a loop can drain your daily budget in minutes," observed one user.
When you just need to build a tiny desktop app: TinyJS
October 13, 2026
Valen creator drives 'Golden Spike' to connect new languages with Rust
September 26, 2026
Microsoft agentically ports Copilot runtime to Rust for $120K
September 19, 2026
Apple iPhone Duo makes developers think in folds
September 16, 2026
JavaScript installer pnpm recast in Rust because ECMAScript can't keep up
September 5, 2026
Kubernetes cleans house, bins legacy kube-dns, IPVS, and cgroup v1
August 27, 2026
How Cursor beat Git's scalability shortcomings
August 24, 2026
Go updates may delight diehard gophers but displease AI overlords
August 21, 2026
SvelteKit 3 puts heat on Next.js with radical approach to RPCs
August 20, 2026
Almost nobody pays attention to web standards anymore
August 18, 2026
ChainDrop worm crawls into npm supply chain, evades standard defenses
August 16, 2026
Node.js creator liberates Durable Objects from Cloudflare
August 13, 2026
AI titans to tidy agent frontier with plugin prescription
August 8, 2026
Platform Engineering 2.0: your platform was built for a different era. AI just exposed it
August 6, 2026
Next.js 16.3 aims to reduce dreaded FATAL ERROR messages
August 5, 2026
Dev who gave HashiCorp its name returns with a faster terminal multiplexer
August 1, 2026
How AI drove Shopify back to clean code
Turns out, agents just want the same things as humans: easily-readable code, explicit contracts, and helpful feedback
July 26, 2026
Zig creator calls Bun's Claude Rust rewrite 'unreviewed slop'
July 15, 2026
HTTP gets a QUERY method so complex searches can stop pretending to be POST
July 14, 2026
Speedier type checks in TypeScript 7.0 as first stable Go release ships
July 10, 2026
GitHub cuts short offer to burn repos on CD after mockery ensues
A purported jab of Sony's physical media phase-out blows up on GitHub itself
July 7, 2026
.NET's long term support is not long term enough, dev complains
June 30, 2026