Wan3.0 在 Artificial Analysis 新视频生成基准中排名第一

我们正在推出 AA-Video-T2V v2.0，这是我们用于评估文本到视频模型的新基准，同时推出用于无音频视频生成的 AA-Video-T2V-Silent v2.0。它基于全新方法论构建，在定期刷新的提示词集上以 1080p 评判每个模型，并在 10 个用例、10 项能力和广泛风格上对它们进行排名。 视频模型正被越来越多的行业和工作流采用，从电影制片厂到广告公司。我们的新基准不仅对模型进行总体排名，还展示哪个模型最适合特定用例和视频生成能力。用例基于消费者和企业使用视频生成的方式。能力借鉴实验室和学术研究，以及创作者和企业如今推动视频模型的方式。我们按用例（如 Live-Action Film 和 Marketing & Advertising）以及所测试的能力（如 Text Rendering 和 Audio Synchronization）为每个提示词打标签，总体基准在两者上均匀采样。因此，总体排名反映了模型跨用例的多面性和跨能力的全面性。我们还按视觉风格为每个提示词打标签，如 photorealistic、3D render、cartoon and anime 和 hand-drawn illustration。 AI 视频也正走向更大的屏幕并进入制作流程，从微短剧到电影院，而生成门槛低正导致低质量 AI 视频内容激增。质量门槛不断提高，因此我们现在以 1080p 和高比特率评判每个片段。 我们推出 AA-Video-T2V v2.0，其基于 1,000 多个提示词、来自位于美国/英国的私人评估者的超过 68,000 张高质量人类偏好投票，以及 AA-Video-T2V-Silent v2.0，其基于 500 多个提示词的超过 47,000 张投票。 对 Artificial Analysis AA-Video-T2V v2.0 排行榜上排名前 10 的模型进行深入分析的初步洞察： ➤ Wan 3.0 总体排名 #1，并在 20 个类别榜单中的 10 个领先，包括 Cartoon and Anime 风格和 Animation & Gaming 用例，价格为每分钟视频 $12。 ➤ Dreamina Seedance 2.5 排名 #2，是人体表现专家，在 Human Anatomy 和 Dialogue & Lip Sync 上均排名 #1。价格为 $34.12/min，是前 10 名中最贵的模型。 ➤ MiniMax H3 (768p) 排名 #3，与 Seedance 2.5 在统计上并列，价格为 $4.80/min，约为其价格的 1/7。它还在 Text Rendering 上排名 #1。 ➤ FLUX 3 排名 #4，其在 Text Rendering（#3）和 Dialogue & Lip Sync（#2）上表现最强。 ➤ Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 排名 #5，是图形 2D 和音频专家，在 UI/UX & Motion Design 用例、Flat Design 风格和 Audio Synchronization 能力上排名 #1。 请见下方用例、能力和风格细分 🧵

查看原文

We are launching AA-Video-T2V v2.0, our new benchmark for evaluating text to video models, alongside AA-Video-T2V-Silent v2.0 for video generation without audio. Built on a new methodology, it judges every model at 1080p on a regularly refreshed prompt set, and ranks them across 10 use cases, 10 capabilities and a wide range of styles. Video models are being adopted across more industries and workflows, from film studios to advertising agencies. Our new benchmark not only ranks models overall, but also shows which model is best for specific use case and video generation capability. Use cases are grounded in how consumers and enterprises use video generation. Capabilities draw on lab and academic research, and on how creators and businesses push video models today. We tag every prompt by use case (such as Live-Action Film and Marketing & Advertising) and by the capability it tests (such as Text Rendering and Audio Synchronization), and the overall benchmark samples evenly across both. Because of this, the overall ranking reflects a model's versatility across use cases and well-roundedness across capabilities. We also tag each prompt by visual style, such as photorealistic, 3D render, cartoon and anime, and hand-drawn illustration. AI video is also moving onto bigger screens and into production, from microdramas to movie theaters, while low barrier to generate is resulting in a proliferation of low quality AI video content. The quality bar keeps rising, so we now judge every clip at 1080p and high bitrate. We are launching AA-Video-T2V v2.0 with more than 68,000 high quality human preference votes from private evaluators based in US/UK over 1,000 prompts, and AA-Video-T2V-Silent v2.0 with more than 47,000 votes over 500 prompts. Initial insights from an in-depth analysis of the 10 highest ranking models on the Artificial Analysis AA-Video-T2V v2.0 Leaderboard: ➤ Wan 3.0 ranks #1 overall and leads 10 of the 20 category boards, including Cartoon and Anime style and Animation & Gaming use case, at $12 per minute of video. ➤ Dreamina Seedance 2.5 ranks #2 and is the human performance specialist, #1 on both Human Anatomy and Dialogue & Lip Sync. At $34.12/min it is the most expensive model in the top 10. ➤ MiniMax H3 (768p) ranks #3, statistically tied with Seedance 2.5 at $4.80/min, about 1/7 of the price. It is also #1 on Text Rendering. ➤ FLUX 3 ranks #4, with its strongest results on Text Rendering (#3) and Dialogue & Lip Sync (#2). ➤ Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 ranks #5 and is the graphic 2D and audio specialist, #1 on UI/UX & Motion Design use case, Flat Design style and Audio Synchronization capability. See below for the use case, capability and style breakdowns 🧵