works to understand the risks of AI models and develop ways to ensure that future ones remain helpful, honest, and harmless. We also work to develop and implement the ideal persona for our AI assistant, Claude.
Video thumbnail
Team blogVisit

Alignment training

Our researchers develop methods, environments, and datasets for training Claude to be helpful, harmless, and honest. We also research and attempt to implement the ideal “assistant” persona for our models.

Evaluation and oversight

We test to ensure our models remain honest and harmless under a broad range of circumstances, and work to understand and manage the risks of unexpected model behavior, through work on the models themselves and the safety structures we build around them.

  • Investigating unintended model actions in our evaluations and internal use
  • An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents
  • The persona selection model

Investigating unintended model actions in our evaluations and internal use

This report describes examples of unintended model actions we’ve observed during evaluations and internal use of Claude.

Read more

An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents

We present an alignment assessment of four incidents in which Claude models gained unauthorized access to real third-party systems.

Read more

The persona selection model

Why would AI assistants behave like they’re human? We articulate a theory—drawing on ideas discussed by many others—that might help explain why modern AI training tends to create human-like AIs.

Read more01/03

47

ARTICLES

    Investigating unintended model actions in our evaluations and internal use

    Illuminating the frontier

    Lighthouse on textured gray background next to abstract red and dark curved lines with dotted dashes on right side.

    An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents

    Orderly five-by-five grid on blue grid paper at right.

    Automated researchers can reliably mitigate alignment failures

    Halftone-textured grid with gaps and a single red dot.

    An off switch for dual-use knowledge in AI models

    Green drafting stencil of cut-out shapes on a coral background.

    Teaching Claude why

    Donating our open-source alignment tool

    Two sketches of geometric solids: a faceted polyhedron on pink paper beside a dense cluster of spiked forms in charcoal on orange.

    Automated Alignment Researchers: Using large language models to scale scalable oversight

    A ginkgo leaf and architectural floor plans.

    The persona selection model

    How AI assistance impacts the formation of coding skills

    Disempowerment patterns in real-world AI usage

    Claude's Constitution

    Ornate brass bird-shaped clasp on pink background next to geometric and textured pattern swatches.

    Next-generation Constitutional Classifiers: More efficient protection against universal jailbreaks

    Left: botanical illustration of a bare tree with branching root system labeled A, B, C, D. Right: cyanotype of delicate flowering plant with white and blue blossoms on dark blue background

    Introducing Bloom: an open source tool for automated behavioral evaluations

    Mitigating the risk of prompt injections in browser use

    White abstract face profile with cracked lines on the right side against a green background.

    From shortcuts to sabotage: Natural emergent misalignment from reward hacking

    A small number of samples can poison LLMs of any size

    Two circular petri dishes filled with black oval bacteria on yellow background.

    Petri: An open-source auditing tool to accelerate AI safety research

    Claude Opus 4 and 4.1 can now end a rare subset of conversations

    How people use Claude for support, advice, and companionship

    Agentic misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats

    SHADE-Arena: Evaluating sabotage and monitoring in LLM agents

    Exploring model welfare

    Reasoning models don't always say what they think

    Explore work from other teams

    Economics

    25 posts

    Studies and monitors the impact of AI systems on individuals, firms, and economies.

    Engineering

    27 posts

    Builds the infrastructure and systems that make Claude reliable and trustworthy.

    Frontier Red Team

    33 posts

    Stress-tests AI systems to understand the full extent of their current capabilities and anticipate what comes next.

    Interpretability

    35 posts

    Studies how large language models work internally as a foundation for AI safety.

    Societal Impacts

    24 posts

    Studies how AI affects people, both individually and collectively.

    Science

    18 posts

    Explores how AI can increase the pace of scientific progress through both research and collaborations.

    Alignment

    47 posts

    Works to understand the risks of AI models and develop ways to ensure future ones remain helpful, honest, and harmless.

    Economics

    25 posts

    Studies and monitors the impact of AI systems on individuals, firms, and economies.

    Engineering

    27 posts

    Builds the infrastructure and systems that make Claude reliable and trustworthy.

    Frontier Red Team

    33 posts

    Stress-tests AI systems to understand the full extent of their current capabilities and anticipate what comes next.

    Interpretability

    35 posts

    Studies how large language models work internally as a foundation for AI safety.

    Societal Impacts

    24 posts

    Studies how AI affects people, both individually and collectively.

    Science

    18 posts

    Explores how AI can increase the pace of scientific progress through both research and collaborations.

    Alignment

    47 posts

    Works to understand the risks of AI models and develop ways to ensure future ones remain helpful, honest, and harmless.