Dan Shipper 团队实测 Gemini 4:写作出色,重构与自检偏弱
Dan Shipper 称 Gemini 4 已发布,他与 every 团队六人用一周时间在编码、写作、设计和知识工作上做了实测,结果好于预期。他认为 Gemini 4 是出色的写作搭档,擅长梳理结构与打磨比喻,但在重构既有代码库和自检上表现不佳:在 Senior Engineer 基准的重构任务中运行 4 小时 47 分钟仅得 21%,而 GPT-6 Astra、Fable 5.1、Sonnet 5.5 和 Opus 5.5 为 81% 至 85%;Kieran 的 38 次基准运行中有 17 次代码审查步骤仅相隔 30 毫秒就开合。他还指出 Google 的桌面智能体应用 Antigravity 落后 Claude Code 和 Codex 约半年到一年,缺少云环境、SSH、内置浏览器和智能权限检查,建议通过 Cursor 或 API 使用该模型。
our vibe check: My new favorite writing partner. DeepMind hired professional writers with red pens to stamp out AI slop, and it worked. I use it to untangle structure and sharpen metaphors; it also taught me something new tracing in a few of my favorite books. It's got a natural feel for structure and detailed explanations that Astra and Opus lack. Shaky at refactors, fast on greenfield apps. At low effort on a from-scratch build, Gemini 4 built @kieranklaassen a working webcam heart-rate monit
匹配字段正文



