←新闻详情

Artificial Analysis更新于 10月25日 23:35

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 在 Artificial Analysis 智能指数得分 42

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13 points higher than MiniMax-M3 and less than half the cost per task. It scores lev

AI 导读

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 在 Artificial Analysis 智能指数上得分 42,比 MiniMax-M3 高 13 分,单任务成本不到后者一半。它在 Humanity's Last Exam 上得 48%、CritPt 得 22%,均高于 GLM-5.3-Flash 和 Gemini 3.8 Flash,略低于 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017。该模型上下文窗口 1M tokens,支持文本与图像输入,定价 $0.15/$0.60 每 1M 输入/输出 tokens,目前权重闭源,MiniMax 宣布将于 10 月 23 日开放权重。

推荐理由

精选AI 评分 71

第三方基准给出该模型与同级 Flash 模型的分数、token 消耗和单任务成本对比,可据此判断性价比位置。

主题

标签

正文

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13 points higher than MiniMax-M3 and less than half the cost per task. It scores level with GLM-5.3-Flash but behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is @MiniMax_AI's new Flash reasoning model, which we benchmarked at its max effort setting. It scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, level with GLM-5.3-Flash (max, 42), just ahead of Gemini 3.8 Flash (high, 41), and behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max, 45)

Key takeaways: ➤ Complex reasoning improved substantially compared to M3: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 48% on Humanity's Last Exam, ahead of GLM-5.3-Flash (max, 40%) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max, 43%), and level with Gemini 3.8 Flash (high, 48%). On CritPt it scores 22%, ahead of GLM-5.3-Flash (15%) and Gemini 3.8 Flash (18%) and just behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (24%). These are up from MiniMax-M3 which scored 39% and 4% respectively

➤ Fewer output tokens, lower cost per task: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash used ~189M output tokens to run the Intelligence Index, considerably fewer than GLM-5.3-Flash (max, ~324M), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max, ~224M) and Gemini 3.8 Flash (high, ~334M). Combined with pricing of $0.15/$0.60 per 1M input/output tokens, this brings its cost to ~$0.22 per Intelligence Index task, vs ~$0.28 for GLM-5.3-Flash, ~$0.26 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and ~$1.24 for Gemini 3.8 Flash, and less than half MiniMax-M3's ~$0.51

➤ High AA-Omniscience accuracy, offset by a high hallucination rate: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash answers 56% of questions correctly on AA-Omniscience, our benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination, vs 28% for GLM-5.3-Flash (max) and 43% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max). It attempts almost every question, resulting in a hallucination rate of 93% and an overall score of 16 on AA-Omniscience

Key model details:

➤ Context window: 1M tokens

➤ Multimodality: Text and image input, text output

➤ Pricing: $0.15/$0.60 per 1M input/output tokens, with cached input at $0.015/M

➤ Availability: MiniMax first-party API, with MiniMax announcing an open weights release on October 23rd

➤ Licensing: Closed weights currently, with MiniMax announcing a weights release on October 23rd

来源

Artificial Analysis