←新闻详情

Artificial Analysis 完整文章更新于 10月25日 18:44

Kimi K3.1 Pro 发布,智能指数排名第 4,权重开放后将领先开源模型

Kimi K3.1 Pro launches at 4th on the Intelligence Index and will lead open weights models | Artificial Analysis

AI 导读

月之暗面发布推理模型 Kimi K3.1 Pro,在 Artificial Analysis 智能指数上得分 55,排名第 4,比 Kimi K3 的 44 分提升 11 分,仅次于 Claude Opus 5.5(58)、Claude Sonnet 5.5(56)和 Muse Wonder Full(56)。其智能体能力提升明显,GDPval-AA 得分 1,846 Elo 排第 3,Terminal-Bench 4.0 得分 67%(Kimi K3 为 13%),AutomationBench-AA 从 58% 升至 73%。模型上下文窗口 1M tokens,总参数 2.8T、激活参数 104B,支持文本和图像输入,定价为每 1M 输入/输出/缓存命中 token 2/10/0.20 美元,三项均比 Kimi K3 低 33%;权重尚未公布,发布后将成为得分最高的开源权重模型,开源与闭源领先模型的差距将从 12 分缩小到 3 分。

推荐理由

精选AI 评分 78

评测机构给出 Kimi K3.1 Pro 在智能指数与智能体基准上的具体分数,并对比其与闭源头部模型的差距。

主题

标签

正文

Artificial Analysis

All articles

October 23, 2026Kimi K3.1 Pro launches at 4th on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index scoring 55, making large gains in agentic performance; it will be the leading open-weights model once its weights are publishedSee model page

Moonshot's new reasoning model gains 11 points over Kimi K3 (max, 44). It trails only Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback, 58), Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback, 56), and Muse Wonder Full (max, 56) on the Intelligence Index.

Once the weights for K3.1 Pro are released it will be the highest-scoring open weights model and the gap between the leading open weights and proprietary models on the Intelligence Index will narrow from 12 points to 3.

Key results: ➤ Large gains in agentic performance: Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 3rd on GDPval-AA with 1,846 Elo, up 312 Elo from Kimi K3, behind only Claude Opus 5.5 (1,866 Elo) and Muse Wonder Full (1,857 Elo). Kimi K3.1 Pro also achieves the highest score of any model on Terminal-Bench 4.0. K3.1 Pro scores 67%, up from 13% for Kimi K3 and ahead of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (64%). AutomationBench-AA, which tests agentic SaaS workflows, rises from 58% to 73%.

➤ Gains in other evals are more moderate: Humanity's Last Exam rises from 47% to 52%, CritPt from 23% to 25%, and SciCode from 59% to 61%. AA-Omniscience Index rises from 20 to 30, as the hallucination rate falls from 53% to 44% and accuracy rises from 48% to 51%.

➤ Cost per Task roughly equal to Kimi K3 at $1.98 per Task: K3.1 Pro uses 55K output tokens per Intelligence Index task, 14% more than Kimi K3 at 48K, while its first-party token prices are 33% lower.

Additional model details: ➤ Context window: 1M tokens. ➤ Size: 2.8T total, 104B active parameters ➤ Input modalities: Text and image ➤ Weights and license: Weights currently not published, Moonshot is expected to release the weights soon after launch ➤ Pricing: $2/$10/$0.20 per 1M input/output/cache hit tokens, 33% lower than Kimi K3 on all three rates.

Individual eval results:

Announcing AA-PersonalityBench: measuring how AI models communicate

AA-PersonalityBench measures the personality and communication style of AI models. A panel of LLM judges compares answers pairwise on 30 personality traits, which roll up into 8 personality indexes, alongside 21 communication characteristics measured directly from every response.

October 19, 2026

HealthBench and HealthBench Professional: Evaluating models in realistic health conversations

We’re launching leaderboards for HealthBench and HealthBench Professional, two benchmarks evaluating how AI models respond in realistic health conversations

October 19, 2026

Reflection has released Beam, their first model launch

Reflection’s first model, Beam, scores 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it #2 among US open weights models

October 16, 2026

来源

Artificial Analysis 完整文章