Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查：让 Claude 先审一遍再交给人类

A quote from Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

AI 导读

Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 在《How the Claude Code team does code review》中提出，与其问“人类读过代码吗”，不如问“这次改动可能出什么问题、该由哪种检查来抓”。代码审查因此从 PR 末尾的关卡变成持续进行，多数改动在人类查看前已由 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次。

正文

#smallhead

16th October 2026

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"

Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.

Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review

Posted 16th October 2026 at 10:06 pm

Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查：让 Claude 先审一遍再交给人类

主题

标签

正文