←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 1622 条结果 清除搜索

星期三

  1. 蚂蚁百灵:Developer Blog

    蚂蚁百灵开源 cuLA:用 CUDA 重写线性注意力内核

    蚂蚁百灵发布 cuLA(CUDA Linear Attention),一套面向 GLA、KDA、GDN、Lightning Attention 等线性注意力变体的高性能 CUDA 内核库,基于 CuTe DSL 与 CUTLASS C++ 手工优化,适配 Hopper(SM90)和 Blackwell(SM10X)GPU。它以 flash-linear-attention(FLA)v0.4.2 的 Triton 实现为基线做 benchmark,接口层与 FLA 保持一致,开发者只需改一行 import 即可替换。项目完全开源,目前仍处早期阶段,后续计划通过 FLA 的 kernel dispatch 机制统一调度。

    实话,团队里大多数人在启动 cuLA 之前几乎没有 CUDA 开发经验。但这并不妨碍我们试一试。从读第一行 CUTLASS 源码,到跑通第一个比 Triton 更快的内核,这个过程充满了乐趣。事实证明,”试一试”本身就是最好的起点。我们希望把这种心态传递出去:如果你也对 GPU 编程感到好奇,哪怕从零开始,cuLA 都欢迎你加入。 更多细节请参考 cuLA GitHub README 。 性能数据 所有 benchmark 均以 flash-linear-attention (FLA) v0.4.2 的 Triton 实现为基线。每组 configs 覆盖了不同 B (batch size)、S (sequence length)、H (head count)、D (head dimension) 的多种组合,以评估不同负载下的加速效果。 这些加速主要来自硬件特性的利用——TMA 异步拷贝、WGMMA/UMMA 指令、多级流水线、warp specialization。 Status & Roadmap General Integrate into flash-linear-atten

    匹配字段正文

  2. goose 官方博客精选

    goose 双向实现 ACP,可接入任意编辑器与智能体

    goose 官方博客介绍其在两个方向实现 Agent Client Protocol(ACP):Zed、JetBrains 等编辑器可自动发现并安装 goose,goose 也能作为客户端调用 Claude Code、Codex、Copilot、Gemini、Amp、Pi 等智能体。ACP 由 Zed Industries 主导,用基于 stdio 的 JSON-RPC 定义编辑器与智能体通信,模型选择、slash 命令、文件读写和终端执行都进入协议,编辑器里配置的 MCP server 会自动加入该 goose 会话。文章同时说明 ACP 仍处于 pre-1.0,权限弹窗渲染、MCP 配置兼容和模型切换支持因编辑器与智能体而异。

    Editors connect to Goose via ACP, and Goose connects to multiple agents

    egistry, no release required. Try It Goose was recently donated to the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF) inside the Linux Foundation. Interoperability is the thesis: goose shouldn't lock you into one agent or one editor. I'm walking through this architecture at AI Native DevCon, where every slide links to the PR or GitHub discussion behind it. Pick the UI you like. Pick the agent you like. They don't have to be the same thing. ACP clients guide; ACP providers guide; Goose on GitHub; Discord community

    匹配字段正文

  3. Mario Zechner 原创博客精选

    pi 作者 Mario Zechner 加入 Earendil,pi 转为该公司旗下项目

    Mario Zechner 宣布加入 Earendil,并把开源编码智能体 pi 一并带入该公司,仓库从 badlogic/pi-mono 迁至 earendil-works/pi,包名从 @mariozechner/pi-coding-agent 改为 @earendil/pi,pi.dev 与 Discord 保持不变。pi 仍保持 MIT 许可,核心永久开源,未来会叠加 Fair Source 增值功能和闭源企业版两层商业化内容;pi 由 Earendil 持有,商标归 Earendil,作者与 Armin、Colin 共同负责技术方向与合并决策,外部 PR 流程不变。

    ccess to the pi repository though. Before we closed the deal, I got to see Cristina, Jakob, Ramiz, Vegard in action, at the office, on the Earendil Discord, and in repositories on GitHub. While each of them has a (somewhat) specialized background, they are actually all generalists. And great human beings with a great sense of humor. I also like to think we are vibing. But it could also be just a case of kids being nice to weird old gramps on the internet, tolerating his shitty jokes. In either c

    匹配字段正文

星期六

  1. Ahead of AI

    Sebastian Raschka 详解编码智能体的六大核心组件

    Sebastian Raschka 将编码智能体拆解为实时仓库上下文、提示词与缓存复用、工具调用、上下文压缩、结构化会话记忆和受限子智能体六个组件。他以纯 Python 实现的 Mini Coding Agent 为例,说明智能体框架如何管理代码上下文、工具、执行与迭代反馈,并比较了编码智能体与 OpenClaw 的定位差异。

    T-5.3 and GPT-5.3-Codex variants. In the next section, I want to go more into the specifics and discuss the core components of a coding harness using my Mini Coding Agent: https://github.com/rasbt/mini-coding-agent. By the way, in this article, I use the terms “coding agent” and “coding harness” somewhat interchangeably for simplicity. (Strictly speaking, the agent is the model-driven decision-making loop, while the harness is the surrounding software scaffold that provides context, tools, and e

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. OpenHands 官方博客

    OpenHands 谈软件智能体控制平面:OpenHands Enterprise 首个整合路由、预算、安全与可观测性

    OpenHands 提出软件智能体技术栈的三大支柱——Harness、Orchestrator 和 Control Plane,并称 OpenHands Enterprise 是首个把 LLM 路由、预算、安全与可观测性整合到一个平台的产品。控制平面集中管理 LLM 路由策略、MCP 访问、密钥访问、预算和用户认证,并审计组织内每个智能体工作流。OpenHands 建议客户使用基于 Kubernetes 的运行时,让每个智能体运行在云基础设施的容器中。

    Diagram of the OpenHands agent control plane with runtime environments, routing, budgets, policies, and observability

    s and add tooling from other ecosystems like Go or Java. And when agents are in the cloud, they can easily be triggered to run on a schedule or based on events happening in Slack, GitHub, and Jira. Once you have agents running in the cloud, observability and control become major issues. Often these agents are not directly monitored—engineers just wait for them to open pull requests. The agents might not even belong to a particular employee. Platform, security, and finance teams need a way to und

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Sarvam AI Blog

    Sarvam AI 提出 Indic ASR 分层评估:从 WER 到 LLM 与语义指标

    Sarvam AI 发布 Indic ASR 分层评估方法,在传统 WER/CER 之外引入 LLM-WER、LLM-CER、Intent Score 和 Entity Preservation Score 四项基于 LLM 的指标,并开源 llm_wer 与 llm_intent_entity 两个评估框架。该方法针对印度语言口语与书面语并存、句中混用英语借词、数字有多种写法等特点,避免传统指标把语义或语音等价的转写误判为错误。文中以支持 22 种印度语言、提供五种输出模式的 Saaras V3 语音识别 API 为例说明。

    le wrong entity can be a catastrophic failure regardless of overall intent. llm intent entity Source note: The scoring methodology below is based on the sarvamai/llm intent entity GitHub README. The LLM judges entity preservation using prompt template.txt in that repository. Banking voice bot Spoken: 'Transfer ₹5,000 to account 9876543210'; ASR output: 'Transfer ₹5,000 to account 9876543220'; Intent Score = 1 (PASS - intent preserved). Entity Score = 0.5 (FAIL - account number wrong). Transactio

    匹配字段正文

  2. Qwen Blog精选

    阿里千问发布 Qwen3.6-Plus,主打真实世界智能体能力

    阿里千问发布 Qwen3.6-Plus,通过阿里云百炼 API 提供,默认 1M 上下文窗口,重点提升智能体编码与多模态感知推理能力。官方基准显示其在 SWE-bench Verified 得 78.8、Terminal-Bench 2.0 得 61.6、QwenClawBench 得 57.2,均高于 Qwen3.5-397B-A17B。API 新增 preserve_thinking 参数用于保留多轮思考内容,默认关闭,可接入 Claude Code、Qwen Code、Cline、OpenCode 等编码工具。

    ng effort) + default BM25 retrieval. VITA-Bench: Avg subdomain scores; using claude-4-sonnet as judger, as the official judger (claude-3.7-sonnet) is no longer available. MCPMark: GitHub MCP v0.30.3; Playwright responses truncated at 32K tokens. MCP-Atlas: Public set score; gemini-2.5-pro judger. HLE w/ tool: 256K ctx w/ context-folding; prunes older tool responses upon threshold breach. WideSearch: 256K ctx w/ management; prunes ≥49,152 tool tokens when 208,896 used. AIME 26: We use the full AI

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. DevClass

    Anthropic 承认 Claude Code 用户用量超预期提前触顶

    Anthropic 承认 Claude Code 用户触达用量上限的速度远超预期,称正在调查并将此列为团队首要任务。有用户反映 Pro 订阅每月 30 天中仅约 12 天可用,Max 5 计划一小时内即耗尽原本可支撑 8 小时的额度。可能原因包括上周对高峰时段收紧配额、3 月 28 日结束的双倍用量促销,以及有用户逆向分析后称发现两个导致 prompt cache 失效、成本虚增 10-20 倍的 bug,部分用户降级到 2.1.34 后有所改善。

    k July 26, 2026 Zig creator calls Bun's Claude Rust rewrite 'unreviewed slop' July 15, 2026 HTTP gets a QUERY method so complex searches can stop pretending to be POST July 14, 2026 Speedier type checks in TypeScript 7.0 as first stable Go release ships July 10, 2026 GitHub cuts short offer to burn repos on CD after mockery ensues A purported jab of Sony's physical media phase-out blows up on GitHub itself July 7, 2026 .NET's long term support is not long term enough, dev complains June 30, 2026

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral AI 发布面向人类与智能体的 CLI 工具 Spaces

    Mistral AI 发布内部平台工具 Spaces CLI,用于脚手架搭建项目、生成配置并部署到 staging,同时兼顾人类开发者与编码智能体两类使用者。团队为每个交互式提问补上等价 flag,并加入 -y 无阻塞模式,使智能体可端到端自主完成配置与部署。每次 init 还会生成 context.json 与 AGENTS.md,向智能体说明项目模块、端口、命令和环境变量,减少其猜测与误操作。

    out which configuration files were needed, generated a config.yaml, and connected the Dockerfile and registry settings - no hand-holding required. In the same pass, it set up the GitHub Actions CI pipeline. From a single prompt to a live deployment took under 10 minutes (a cycle time we're actively working to bring down). After that, the repository was fully configured and the embeds were deployed with Koyeb — as a Space, scaffolded and deployed through Spaces itself. Yes, the interactive demos

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Prime Intellect精选

    Prime Intellect 与 Browserbase 合作推出 BrowserEnv 浏览器智能体训练环境

    Prime Intellect 宣布与 Browserbase 合作推出 BrowserEnv,把 Browserbase 的可扩展浏览器基础设施开放给所有人,用于训练浏览器和计算机使用智能体。BrowserEnv 支持两种模式:面向视觉语言模型的 CUA 模式通过截图和屏幕坐标操作,面向纯文本模型的 DOM 模式借助 Browserbase 的 Stagehand SDK 处理完整 DOM 上下文。团队用 WebVoyager 基准的 600 个真实网页任务微调 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct,训练运行与环境均已发布在 Hub 上并可复现。

    Partnering with Browserbase to Train Browser and Computer Use Agents

    tack, we fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct on 600 real web tasks from the WebVoyager benchmark, training it to navigate, search, and extract information from live sites like Amazon, GitHub, and Allrecipes. The training run and the environment are both on the Hub and fully reproducible, with a full guide here. Two Modes: CUA and DOM BrowserEnv supports two modes, and which one you pick depends on your model. CUA mode is for vision-language models: the agent sees screenshots and acts through screen

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Sakana AI:Blog

    Sakana AI 的 AI Scientist 论文登上 Nature

    Sakana AI 宣布其 AI Scientist 相关论文登上 Nature,该工作由 Sakana AI、不列颠哥伦比亚大学、Vector Institute 和牛津大学研究者合作完成。论文详述了系统架构与扩展的新发现,并给出自动查重系统与人类判定对比的结果,平衡准确率为 69%,F1 分数超过 NeurIPS 2021 一致性实验中人类之间的合致率。研究还观察到科学缩放律,即基础模型能力提升时生成论文的质量也随之提高,同时列出当前仍存在的原创性不足、实现复杂代码困难与引用不准确等局限。

    る成果です。 今回の Nature論文(オープンアクセス)では、システムのアーキテクチャやスケーリングに関する新知見、そして「AIが科学を生成する未来」がもたらす展望と課題について、包括的に詳述しています。 Nature掲載論文:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10265-5; コードと生成論文はこちら(GitHub): AI Scientist-v1、 AI Scientist-v2 開発の歩み 今回の掲載に至るまで、私たちは基盤モデルの進化に合わせて試行錯誤を繰り返し、改良を重ねてきました。 研究の自動化が可能であることの証明 初期のリリースでは、まずシンプルな学習コード(例:nanoGPT)をテンプレートとして与えました。システムはそこから自律的に斬新なアイデアを膨らませ、実験を実行し、一編の論文へとまとめ上げます。同時に、論文の質を評価する「自動査読システム(Automated Reviewer)」も構築。これにより、研究プロセスのエンドツーエンドでの自動化が可能であることを証明しました。; 科学の「チューリングテスト」への

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Sakana AI:Blog精选

    Sakana AI 的 AI Scientist 论文登上 Nature

    Sakana AI 宣布其 The AI Scientist 相关论文已在 Nature 发表,论文详述系统架构并给出新的缩放结果。该系统在给定宽泛研究方向后可自主生成研究想法、检索文献、设计并执行实验,并用 LaTeX 撰写整篇论文;其 AI Scientist-v2 生成的论文曾在 ICLR 2025 ICBINB workshop 盲审中获得 6.33 的平均分,高于 55% 的人类投稿。团队还构建了 Automated Reviewer,在 OpenReview 数据上取得 69% 的平衡准确率,并发现基础模型越强、生成论文质量越高的缩放规律。

    details our system’s architecture, outlines several new scaling results, and discusses the promise and challenges of AI-generated science. Explore the code and generated papers on GitHub: AI Scientist-v1, AI Scientist-v2 Example sections of a paper produced by The AI Scientist that passed the peer-review process for a workshop at a top-tier international AI conference. The Journey So Far Our journey to this publication has been a 1.5-year process with distinct phases shaped by foundation model d

    匹配字段正文

  2. Anthropic Engineering精选

    Anthropic 详解 Claude Code auto mode:如何更安全地跳过权限确认

    Anthropic 发布 Claude Code auto mode,用输入层的提示注入探针和输出层基于 Sonnet 4.6 的 transcript 分类器替代人工逐条批准,以缓解审批疲劳。分类器分两阶段运行,第一阶段单 token 快速过滤、第二阶段仅在命中时启用链式推理,把 8.5% 的误报率降到 0.4%。在 52 条真实过度主动行为样本上,其漏报率为 17%,官方称多数漏判源于把会话中的批准痕迹误当作对当前操作范围的授权。

    ay. We keep an internal incident log focused on agentic misbehaviors. Past examples include deleting remote git branches from a misinterpreted instruction, uploading an engineer's GitHub auth token to an internal compute cluster, and attempting migrations against a production database. Each of these was the result of the model being overeager, taking initiative in a way the user didn't intend. We documented this pattern in the Claude Opus 4.6 system card (§6.2.1 and §6.2.3.3). How it works Auto

    匹配字段正文

  3. Browser Use精选

    Browser Use 用 Auto-Research 在 Online-Mind2Web 上取得 97%

    Browser Use 称其浏览器智能体在 Online-Mind2Web 基准上取得 97%,为目前最高分。该基准包含 136 个真实网站的 300 个任务,团队用 Claude Code 配合评测平台 CLI 循环运行 20 轮自动搜索最优智能体,并把浏览器智能体改造为可写 Python 解析 HTML 的编码智能体。团队还构建了基于 Claude Agent SDK 的智能体评审,并公开了仓库、提示词、结果与评判,便于复现。

    e use all 300 tasks. Our few failures come from unavailable sites, ambiguous prompts, or websites that changed since the benchmark was created. Rerunning our results is easy Clone github.com/browser-use/online-mind2web, set your Browser Use API key, and run. We also uploaded prompts, results, and judgments. We need harder benchmarks We're building a benchmark with everything users actually care about. Currently benchmarks ignore tasks like: "Extract 1000 products with subpages and compare them a

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Modem:Blog

    Modem 接入 PostHog:用自然语言查询产品分析数据

    Modem 面向所有用户上线 PostHog 集成,可从 Settings → Integrations 连接,或让 @Modem 协助配置。连接后 Modem 智能体通过 API 实时查询 PostHog 的产品分析、功能开关和 A/B 实验数据,用户用自然语言提问即可获得事件计数、漏斗、留存、HogQL 趋势及实验统计显著性等结果。设置约需一分钟,需在 PostHog 生成以 phx_ 开头的 Personal API key,密钥静态加密且不会出现在智能体回复中。

    Slack message asking Modem to look at PostHog for active users

    ble for all Modem users. Connect it from Settings → Integrations or ask @Modem to help you set it up. Modem already connects to many tools your team uses every day: Slack, Linear, GitHub, and more. But product analytics lived in a separate tab — you'd context-switch to PostHog, build the right query, and bring the numbers back yourself. Now Modem can do that for you. Get answers from PostHog using plain english Connect your PostHog instance and the Modem agent gains direct access to your product

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Answer.AI 官方研发博客

    Answer.AI 分析 PyPI 数据:AI 提效只体现在 AI 相关热门包上

    Answer.AI 分析 PyPI 数据发现,ChatGPT 发布后整体新包创建量并未明显增长,2026 年 3 月新包超过 25,000 个,接近 2025 年 3 月的两倍,但此前的峰值多来自垃圾与恶意包。按是否与 AI 相关拆分后,2023 年首次发布的 AI 相关包首年更新中位数为 20 次,约为同年非 AI 包的两倍;在下载量前 7,500 的热门包中,AI 相关包在 ChatGPT 后年更新中位数升至 21 至 26 次,而非 AI 热门包稳定在约 10 次。作者提出两种解释,一是做 AI 工具的人更会用 AI,二是资金与热度让 AI 相关包被投入更多人力,但数据无法判断哪种影响更大。

    increasing in 2019 (at 10 releases/year), well before modern AI coding tools appeared. This seems just as likely to be due to growing adoption of continuous integration tools like GitHub Actions, which have been around longer. Another reason to doubt this increase is entirely due to AI is the other effect visible in this chart, which is that packages are released less frequently as they get older. This is seen in the fact that all of the cohort life lines decrease over time. That has not changed

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. METR Notes精选

    METR:约半数通过 SWE-bench 的 AI PR 不会被维护者合并

    METR 让 3 个 SWE-bench Verified 仓库的 4 名维护者复核 296 个 AI 生成的 PR,发现约一半通过自动评分的 PR 不会被合并进 main,维护者合并率平均比自动评分低约 24.2 个百分点。研究同时用 47 个人类已合并 PR 作为基准来校正维护者判断中的噪声,并指出智能体没有像人类开发者那样根据反馈迭代的机会,因此这并不代表能力上限。按时间跨度换算,Claude Sonnet 4.5 在自动评分下约 50 分钟,在维护者合并标准下仅约 8 分钟。

    es to avoid penalizing agents for artifacts they were not instructed to remove prior to submission.3 We upload the patches to a private copy of the repo in its historical state on GitHub. For our main analysis, we only submit PRs for review if they pass the SWE-bench automated grader. We impute maintainer review as failure if the PR fails the automated grader. This amounts to assuming SWE-bench Verified has no false negatives (cases where the automated grader says fail, but the maintainer would

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. Cognition 模型 / Devin 博客

    Cognition 如何用 Devin 构建 Devin

    Cognition 披露其内部用 Devin 构建 Devin,上周合并了 659 个 Devin PR,远超 2025 年最佳单周的 154 个。团队在 web、Slack、Linear、CLI、API 等界面使用 Devin,并借助 Devin Review 自动审查每个 PR,支持 Autofix、智能 diff 组织与 Bug Catcher。此外还通过 !triage-bug playbook 和 Datadog MCP 实现 bug 自动分诊与端到端调试。

    y session prompt automatically. Automated Code Review As we ship more code with agents, the bottleneck shifted from writing code to reviewing it. Devin Review turns large, complex GitHub PRs into intuitively organized diffs and precise explanations. We use it for every PR now. Every time Devin posts a PR in Slack, it includes a Devin Review link, so the organized diff is always one click away. What makes Devin Review useful: Autofix. If Devin Review or a GitHub bot flags bugs, Devin automaticall

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Ahead of AI

    2026 年 1—2 月开放权重 LLM 架构对比:10 组主要模型发布

    作者对 2026 年 1—2 月的主要开放权重 LLM 发布进行架构对比,并补充了 3 月 6 日发布的 Sarvam 30B 和 105B。文章逐一分析 Trinity Large、Kimi K2.5、Step 3.5 Flash、Qwen3-Coder-Next、GLM-5、MiniMax M2.5、Nanbeige 4.1 3B、Qwen3.5、Ling 2.5、Ring 2.5 与 Tiny Aya,重点比较 MoE、混合注意力、MLA、Gated DeltaNet、滑动窗口注意力和 MTP 等设计。作者认为,近期架构普遍加入计算效率优化,但模型表现也很大程度取决于数据质量和训练方案。

    ts are Trinity Mini (26B with 3B active parameters) and Trinity Nano (6B with 1B active parameters) Along with the model weights, Arcee AI also released a nice technical report on GitHub (as of Feb 18 also on arxiv) with lots of details. So, let’s take a closer look at the 400B flagship model. Figure 2 below compares it to z.AI’s GLM-4.5, which is perhaps the most similar model due to its size with 355B parameters. As we can see in the Trinity and GLM-4.5 comparison, there are several interestin

    匹配字段正文

  2. antirez 原创博客

    antirez 用 Claude Code 洁净室实现 Z80 / ZX Spectrum 模拟器

    antirez 用 Claude Code 在洁净室条件下实现了 Z80 与 ZX Spectrum 模拟器,Z80 部分零干预、20 到 30 分钟内产出 1200 行可读 C 代码,并通过 ZEXDOC 和 ZEXALL 测试。他先让 Claude 联网收集 Z80 文档并整理成 markdown,随后删除会话再重新开始,禁止联网和查找同类源码;Spectrum 的 TAP 加载部分则使用了大量人工引导。

    en a ZX Spectrum emulator (and even more, a CP/M emulator, see later) in a condition that I believe makes a more sense as “clean room” setup. The result can be found here: https://github.com/antirez/ZOT . The process I used 1. I wrote a markdown file with the specification of what I wanted to do. Just English, high level ideas about the scope of the Z80 emulator to implement. I said things like: it should execute a whole instruction at a time, not a single clock step, since this emulator must be

    匹配字段正文