←新闻详情

Cognition更新于 10月30日 14:25

Cognition 公布 Gemini 4 双版本 FrontierCode 2.0 成绩

We've evaluated Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon on FrontierCode 2.0, our coding benchmark that measure's a model's ability to go beyond the spec.

AI 导读

Cognition 在自研编程基准 FrontierCode 2.0 上评测了 Gemini 4 Carbon 与 Gemini 4 Argon。Gemini 4 Carbon 得分 40%,接近 SOTA,每任务成本 $4.04,落后于 Claude Opus 5.5、GPT-6 Astra 和 Claude Sonnet 5.5;Gemini 4 Argon 得分 26.3%,每任务成本 $6.41,领先 Muse Wonder 1.0,但落后于 Claude Haiku 5.5 和 Grok 4.7。

正文

We've evaluated Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon on FrontierCode 2.0, our coding benchmark that measure's a model's ability to go beyond the spec.

Gemini 4 Carbon scores near SOTA with a score of 40% and a cost of $4.04 per task, behind Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Gemini 4 Argon scores 26.3% with a cost of $6.41 per task, ahead of Muse Wonder 1.0, but behind Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7.

See the leaderboard with full scores: https://t.co/PPHwljDuaN

来源

Cognition